Jason Johannisen

Started by almonds, March 12, 2016, 10:22:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jimmykidd

was in and out of my team but i went with rich instead. was looking like a horrible choice at half time haha but he lifted. lets see what JJ can do next week.

Asparagus

Quote from: Jimmykidd on March 28, 2016, 01:07:39 PM
was in and out of my team but i went with rich instead. was looking like a horrible choice at half time haha but he lifted. lets see what JJ can do next week.
this

so funny we did exactly the same.
Rich at qtr time on minus 2 was going to make me throw up. Pulling out 102 was a nice comeback in 3/4's of footy.

sammy123

still not sure about old mate JJ. still don't think he can keep it up for the whole year

North Melbournes Finest

Quote from: sammy123 on March 28, 2016, 01:24:12 PM
still not sure about old mate JJ. still don't think he can keep it up for the whole year
You saw his haircut yeah? His bald head gives him better endurance and wind resistance to last the year ;)

Judd Magic

Happy of my premo backline of Shaw, Boyd, Laird instead.  8)

Grufflez

35 possies with only 9 contested tells me he was just running loose, can anyone who saw the game fill me in on where he picked up most of his possessions please.
Have new inclusions down back and returned players like libba allowed the Dogs to let him roam freely?

GCSkiwi

Quote from: Grufflez on March 29, 2016, 08:16:53 AM
35 possies with only 9 contested tells me he was just running loose, can anyone who saw the game fill me in on where he picked up most of his possessions please.
Have new inclusions down back and returned players like libba allowed the Dogs to let him roam freely?

Was half watching and the dogs did a lot of ball movement through defense, he seemed to get a lot of action around HBF and moving out of defense. Freo's pressure was non-existent which definitely contributed, there were lots of little nothing handballs and kicks (in general, not JJ specifically).

Grufflez

Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 29, 2016, 08:47:36 AM
Quote from: Grufflez on March 29, 2016, 08:16:53 AM
35 possies with only 9 contested tells me he was just running loose, can anyone who saw the game fill me in on where he picked up most of his possessions please.
Have new inclusions down back and returned players like libba allowed the Dogs to let him roam freely?

Was half watching and the dogs did a lot of ball movement through defense, he seemed to get a lot of action around HBF and moving out of defense. Freo's pressure was non-existent which definitely contributed, there were lots of little nothing handballs and kicks (in general, not JJ specifically).

Cheers mate, so we can put this one down to the Bulldogs flogging Freo, I need an Upgrade in defense and i am Looking at him but prefer Docherty at the moment.

ronl

As Skiwi inferred, it's probably best to put off a decision until we see him in pressure situations. Freo were a rabble and they will come good, best not to take anything from that game.

Torpedo10

Quote from: Grufflez on March 29, 2016, 09:50:51 AM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 29, 2016, 08:47:36 AM
Quote from: Grufflez on March 29, 2016, 08:16:53 AM
35 possies with only 9 contested tells me he was just running loose, can anyone who saw the game fill me in on where he picked up most of his possessions please.
Have new inclusions down back and returned players like libba allowed the Dogs to let him roam freely?

Was half watching and the dogs did a lot of ball movement through defense, he seemed to get a lot of action around HBF and moving out of defense. Freo's pressure was non-existent which definitely contributed, there were lots of little nothing handballs and kicks (in general, not JJ specifically).

Cheers mate, so we can put this one down to the Bulldogs flogging Freo, I need an Upgrade in defense and i am Looking at him but prefer Docherty at the moment.
Yep! Been on the Docherty train from the start.

Raiden

This guy ripped it up in the NAB, round 1 did the same - If he can produce a similar game this week, I'm tempted to say his the real deal this year. His super quick, suits the Dog's fast game plan/style.

juzztheball

I brought in JJ as a POD. Spewing his back to back 130's means he will most likely be in alot of teams very soon, wether it be start of rd3 or as a very early upgrade option...

fanTCfool

Getting tempted, not sure either way.

ronl

As soon as the doggies lose a game or two they'll start toying with their structure, move things around, give guys different jobs etc. in an attempt to relight the fire. It always happens.  I'm tempted to get this guy while the going is good, but I'm afraid it might not last too much much longer and instead of 90+ I'm getting 70's.  I'll stick with Shaw, Laird and Jimmy for the time being.

sammy123

i think he was running lose again last night