Main Menu

Cripps

Started by Blues Blues Blues, March 11, 2016, 11:03:21 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Blues Blues Blues

Yes I know it was just a NAB, but I constantly are blown away by this kid. He has bulked up over summer and looks like a beast. He got rested for essentially a qtr but still scored 107.

At $519k, I've just traded Fyfe out and used the excess cash to turn DeGoey to Buddy.

Anyone else considering?

nostradamus

Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 11, 2016, 11:03:21 PM
Yes I know it was just a NAB, but I constantly are blown away by this kid. He has bulked up over summer and looks like a beast. He got rested for essentially a qtr but still scored 107.

At $519k, I've just traded Fyfe out and used the excess cash to turn DeGoey to Buddy.

Anyone else considering?

bold move, but gotta risk it to get the biscuit ............ how will you be planning to get Fyfe back in, am assuming that would be in your plans

Money Shot

Graham will out score Cripps

112 for Graham
108 for Cripps

Blues Blues Blues

Quote from: Money Shot on March 11, 2016, 11:12:11 PM
Graham will out score Cripps

112 for Graham
108 for Cripps

Very big call moneyshot

TomK

Quote from: Money Shot on March 11, 2016, 11:12:11 PM
Graham will out score Cripps

112 for Graham
108 for Cripps
Graham will have a good year but that is no chance of happening.

fanTCfool

Graham will average triple figures, Cripps will outscore him though

meow meow

Nick Graham to be in the top 10 players in the competition? Seriously? Based on what?

Money Shot

Quote from: meow meow on March 11, 2016, 11:25:32 PM
Nick Graham to be in the top 10 players in the competition? Seriously? Based on what?
Based on bias ;)

Blues Blues Blues

I lost my nerve and traded Fyfe back in for him!
M would still love him, but I don't know who to drop:

Fyfe
Danger
GAJ
Rocky
Parker

Hmmmm

meow meow

Quote from: Money Shot on March 11, 2016, 11:28:30 PM
Quote from: meow meow on March 11, 2016, 11:25:32 PM
Nick Graham to be in the top 10 players in the competition? Seriously? Based on what?
Based on bias ;)

Bias would get him to about 95. The extra 17 must be downright delusional.

Money Shot

Nick Graham will go 100+
I know he won't score better than Cripps but he is a gun.

fanTCfool

Quote from: Money Shot on March 11, 2016, 11:38:57 PM
Nick Graham will go 100+
I know he won't score better than Cripps but he is a gun.

Quote from: Money Shot on March 11, 2016, 11:12:11 PM
Graham will out score Cripps

112 for Graham
108 for Cripps

:o

Money Shot

I was joking about the out scoring of Cripps. You can't outscore the top player in the comp ::)

I'm just happy that our defence and midfield is finally looking good 8)
Wish I could say the same for our forward line :(

Blues Blues Blues

Quote from: Money Shot on March 11, 2016, 11:43:53 PM
I was joking about the out scoring of Cripps. You can't outscore the top player in the comp ::)

I'm just happy that our defence and midfield is finally looking good 8)
Wish I could say the same for our forward line :(

Good to see Daisy return to form and show us he was a great pick worth every penny  >:(

Colley Dogs

#14
I'll declare up front I'm a Blues supporter.

I currently have M. Crouch at M5 (Libba @ M6; Mills @ M7). I'm going for M. over B. Crouch because I need to place my trust in the body above my hope in the ceiling.

Therefore... M. Crouch or N. Graham?

Feels like a marginal call.

Adelaide will win more games than the Blues, but Graham is a bigger fish in a smaller pond. Am I wrong in predicting Graham will average low 100s this year, whereas M. Crouch will more than likely be a 95 - 100 player? Either way, both players will end up being a 1-trade sideways move to a fallen premium. Which is more optimal?

Of course, we wouldn't be having this conversation if B. Crouch had played just 1 NAB game pre Rd 1.