Ultimate Team AFL: Discussion + Banter thread

[_wato]

Once I thought it over, gonna keep the 50G hahaha

[fanTCfool]

Nice work on sorting out these Omegas and Flashbacks, you've done well to please everyone effected fairly.

Here's a random idea that just came to me, instead of +5 on cards that you have 3 of, what if it was +10/15/20%?
It's a little more difficult to figure out, but it provides better reward for collecting more of 'better' players.

eg. 3 x Kade Simpson = +20% = say 100+20 = 120
where 3 x Zac Dawson = +20% = say 40+8 = 48

instead of both just getting a +5?

More reward for collecting better players?

[Holz]

Nice work on sorting out these Omegas and Flashbacks, you've done well to please everyone effected fairly.

Here's a random idea that just came to me, instead of +5 on cards that you have 3 of, what if it was +10/15/20%?
It's a little more difficult to figure out, but it provides better reward for collecting more of 'better' players.

eg. 3 x Kade Simpson = +20% = say 100+20 = 120
where 3 x Zac Dawson = +20% = say 40+8 = 48

instead of both just getting a +5?

More reward for collecting better players?

Makes loads of sense.

Saw bm was going for 3 gawn

Doesnt make sense given how pricy

[Spite]

Nice work on sorting out these Omegas and Flashbacks, you've done well to please everyone effected fairly.

Here's a random idea that just came to me, instead of +5 on cards that you have 3 of, what if it was +10/15/20%?
It's a little more difficult to figure out, but it provides better reward for collecting more of 'better' players.

eg. 3 x Kade Simpson = +20% = say 100+20 = 120
where 3 x Zac Dawson = +20% = say 40+8 = 48

instead of both just getting a +5?

More reward for collecting better players?

I quite like that idea. Obviously not for this season but it's one to think about. Not sure how I'd fix someone like wells though, he's a bronze (so easier to collect) and a +10% would be a huge 10ppg basically. Probably less deserving than someone collecting 3 buddy franklin golds for a +10% of the same amount.

[Holz]

Nice work on sorting out these Omegas and Flashbacks, you've done well to please everyone effected fairly.

Here's a random idea that just came to me, instead of +5 on cards that you have 3 of, what if it was +10/15/20%?
It's a little more difficult to figure out, but it provides better reward for collecting more of 'better' players.

eg. 3 x Kade Simpson = +20% = say 100+20 = 120
where 3 x Zac Dawson = +20% = say 40+8 = 48

instead of both just getting a +5?

More reward for collecting better players?

I quite like that idea. Obviously not for this season but it's one to think about. Not sure how I'd fix someone like wells though, he's a bronze (so easier to collect) and a +10% would be a huge 10ppg basically. Probably less deserving than someone collecting 3 buddy franklin golds for a +10% of the same amount.

I reckon scaling by rarity.

[_wato]

Another thing I never added. I wouldn't mind seeing the team sizes becoming bigger.

So instead of fielding 8 in a 2-3-1-2 form I wouldn't mind an 11 player 3-4-1-3 format. Adds to the game and makes it more meaningful to keep players for depth instead of trading for better cards. Bc a lot of teams now have no real flaws on any line, it's just all about upgrading to a better prem.

[GoLions]

Another thing I never added. I wouldn't mind seeing the team sizes becoming bigger.

So instead of fielding 8 in a 2-3-1-2 form I wouldn't mind an 11 player 3-4-1-3 format. Adds to the game and makes it more meaningful to keep players for depth instead of trading for better cards. Bc a lot of teams now have no real flaws on any line, it's just all about upgrading to a better prem.

Yeah this could work. For some teams, it's just about going from Golds to Plats now, so those 3 extra spots could make things a lot more interesting.

[Spite]

Another thing I never added. I wouldn't mind seeing the team sizes becoming bigger.

So instead of fielding 8 in a 2-3-1-2 form I wouldn't mind an 11 player 3-4-1-3 format. Adds to the game and makes it more meaningful to keep players for depth instead of trading for better cards. Bc a lot of teams now have no real flaws on any line, it's just all about upgrading to a better prem.

Yeah this could work. For some teams, it's just about going from Golds to Plats now, so those 3 extra spots could make things a lot more interesting.

Well, I was going to spring this upon people in 2 weeks but you've kind of killed the surprise :P (seriously, dammit Wato!)

We will be moving to a 3-4-1-3 format in two weeks for the start of the byes

There will also be a marketplace again in the near future

[Big Mac]

Another thing I never added. I wouldn't mind seeing the team sizes becoming bigger.

So instead of fielding 8 in a 2-3-1-2 form I wouldn't mind an 11 player 3-4-1-3 format. Adds to the game and makes it more meaningful to keep players for depth instead of trading for better cards. Bc a lot of teams now have no real flaws on any line, it's just all about upgrading to a better prem.

Yeah this could work. For some teams, it's just about going from Golds to Plats now, so those 3 extra spots could make things a lot more interesting.

Well, I was going to spring this upon people in 2 weeks but you've kind of killed the surprise :P (seriously, dammit Wato!)

We will be moving to a 3-4-1-3 format in two weeks for the start of the byes

Excellent  8)

[Holz]

Another thing I never added. I wouldn't mind seeing the team sizes becoming bigger.

So instead of fielding 8 in a 2-3-1-2 form I wouldn't mind an 11 player 3-4-1-3 format. Adds to the game and makes it more meaningful to keep players for depth instead of trading for better cards. Bc a lot of teams now have no real flaws on any line, it's just all about upgrading to a better prem.

Yeah this could work. For some teams, it's just about going from Golds to Plats now, so those 3 extra spots could make things a lot more interesting.

Well, I was going to spring this upon people in 2 weeks but you've kind of killed the surprise :P (seriously, dammit Wato!)

We will be moving to a 3-4-1-3 format in two weeks for the start of the byes

Excellent  8)

hang on is this just for the byes or for the rest of the season including the finals?

it dramatically changes my team

I actually only have 2 defenders and 3 mids.

[_wato]

Flower yeh Spite, that made my day. Sorry for ruining the surprise hahahaha

[Spite]

Another thing I never added. I wouldn't mind seeing the team sizes becoming bigger.

So instead of fielding 8 in a 2-3-1-2 form I wouldn't mind an 11 player 3-4-1-3 format. Adds to the game and makes it more meaningful to keep players for depth instead of trading for better cards. Bc a lot of teams now have no real flaws on any line, it's just all about upgrading to a better prem.

Yeah this could work. For some teams, it's just about going from Golds to Plats now, so those 3 extra spots could make things a lot more interesting.

Well, I was going to spring this upon people in 2 weeks but you've kind of killed the surprise :P (seriously, dammit Wato!)

We will be moving to a 3-4-1-3 format in two weeks for the start of the byes

Excellent  8)

hang on is this just for the byes or for the rest of the season including the finals?

it dramatically changes my team

I actually only have 2 defenders and 3 mids.

Rest of the season. You still have time to fix it up man!

[Spite]

What do you guys think about a recycling option for the cards?

For example, 3 of the same rarity of card could be traded in for the same rarity of that card.

Eg 3 golds for a new gold. 3 platinums for a new platinum?

If you like it, when would we implement it or not this season?

[Holz]

What do you guys think about a recycling option for the cards?

For example, 3 of the same rarity of card could be traded in for the same rarity of that card.

Eg 3 golds for a new gold. 3 platinums for a new platinum?

If you like it, when would we implement it or not this season?

I love it.

happy to implement it right now personally.

probably would have used it a few times.

Got Devon Smith as 1 recycle card.

[nrich102]

Can we have a way of playing 2 rucks?