B Crouch - cheap 100+ option

Started by Holz, February 25, 2016, 02:23:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ants

Quote from: ivolve on March 29, 2016, 01:53:23 AM
Quote from: DazBurg on March 27, 2016, 10:03:25 AM
supercoach station on FB posted this courtesy of fantasy freako


STATS

Some interesting stats from last night's North v Adelaide game provided by Fantasy Freako.

- Todd Goldstein had double the hitouts to advantage than Sam Jacobs, finishing with 16 HTA to 8. Did anyone not start with Goldy?

- Also Matt Crouch has been squeezed out of the centre bounces with the return of his brother only attending 14. The top 3 were Scott Thompson with 26 attendances then Brad Crouch and Rory Sloane with 21 each

just found that interesting ;)

This makes me happier. For his price I wasn't expecting Dangerfield type scores and its only 1 weeks so I'll take a 70. Can anybody tell me where he will sit $ wise if he averages 75-85 going forward? he's a stepping stone for most so curious on how that looks and my math is Flowerhouse. (did i phrase that right?)
Cheers
hmm i have both crouch's so a bit worrying in regards to matt!

bottlemart

Quote from: Holz on March 27, 2016, 11:34:06 AM
Loved what i saw, happy with him as a pick.

Seeds is the worry.

Still both should peform next week
I have no concerns with either of the Crouch boys, have them both and think both will generate cash and score well.

I also have Seedsman though.  Can corrective trade to Ben Kennedy.  Only reason I didn't pick Ben Kennedy was because I was concerned about JS with Petracca and Brayshaw coming back soon, but from what I saw Ben Kennedy looked very good. Thoughts please.

BomberSam

Quote from: bottlemart on March 30, 2016, 09:46:43 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 27, 2016, 11:34:06 AM
Loved what i saw, happy with him as a pick.

Seeds is the worry.

Still both should peform next week
I have no concerns with either of the Crouch boys, have them both and think both will generate cash and score well.

I also have Seedsman though.  Can corrective trade to Ben Kennedy.  Only reason I didn't pick Ben Kennedy was because I was concerned about JS with Petracca and Brayshaw coming back soon, but from what I saw Ben Kennedy looked very good. Thoughts please.

If you picked Seedsman thinking he would be a keeper, then common advice is not to jerk the knee after one week. Despite this, Seedsman to Ben Kennedy looks like a very sensible trade.

bottlemart

Quote from: BomberSam on March 30, 2016, 10:18:59 PM
Quote from: bottlemart on March 30, 2016, 09:46:43 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 27, 2016, 11:34:06 AM
Loved what i saw, happy with him as a pick.

Seeds is the worry.

Still both should peform next week
I have no concerns with either of the Crouch boys, have them both and think both will generate cash and score well.

I also have Seedsman though.  Can corrective trade to Ben Kennedy.  Only reason I didn't pick Ben Kennedy was because I was concerned about JS with Petracca and Brayshaw coming back soon, but from what I saw Ben Kennedy looked very good. Thoughts please.

If you picked Seedsman thinking he would be a keeper, then common advice is not to jerk the knee after one week. Despite this, Seedsman to Ben Kennedy looks like a very sensible trade.
Thanks Bomber,

Yes, probably more concerned with getting Kennedy in rather than Seedsman out, but with Kennedy looking good and reasonably secure, someone will have to make way to make the trade.  The other options to make way would be Toby Greene, unless one of my rookies get dropped.

BomberSam

Quote from: bottlemart on March 30, 2016, 10:32:35 PM
Quote from: BomberSam on March 30, 2016, 10:18:59 PM
Quote from: bottlemart on March 30, 2016, 09:46:43 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 27, 2016, 11:34:06 AM
Loved what i saw, happy with him as a pick.

Seeds is the worry.

Still both should peform next week
I have no concerns with either of the Crouch boys, have them both and think both will generate cash and score well.

I also have Seedsman though.  Can corrective trade to Ben Kennedy.  Only reason I didn't pick Ben Kennedy was because I was concerned about JS with Petracca and Brayshaw coming back soon, but from what I saw Ben Kennedy looked very good. Thoughts please.

If you picked Seedsman thinking he would be a keeper, then common advice is not to jerk the knee after one week. Despite this, Seedsman to Ben Kennedy looks like a very sensible trade.
Thanks Bomber,

Yes, probably more concerned with getting Kennedy in rather than Seedsman out, but with Kennedy looking good and reasonably secure, someone will have to make way to make the trade.  The other options to make way would be Toby Greene, unless one of my rookies get dropped.

Anytime mate.

I would think Seedsman should go way ahead of Greene, but my advice is this; no trades this week. Watch both Greene and Seedsman on the weekend and then assess the situation with an extra rounds knowledge.

mark44

Well well well, anyone else concerned? Not looking good at all

Raiden

Quote from: mark44 on April 02, 2016, 05:07:59 PM
Well well well, anyone else concerned? Not looking good at all

Very concerned now, thinking maybe a downgrade to Parish could be a better option next week.

Holz

will come good but feel a correction trade is worth it

probably going Crouch to Hewett/Hartley (via dpp) then Seeds to laird

Mat0369

He's going to ton up next week against Richmond. Lock it in now

Spite


eg6914

Quote from: Spite on April 02, 2016, 06:03:36 PM
He got an 83. Still good
I am holding, he is far more consistent than a rookie and will still have a low BE

bottlemart

Quote from: Spite on April 02, 2016, 06:03:36 PM
He got an 83. Still good

Yes it is still good.  Not sure what some people are expecting from a player priced at $306 100.

mark44

Down to parish is so tempting

enzedder

Quote from: bottlemart on April 02, 2016, 06:09:19 PM
Quote from: Spite on April 02, 2016, 06:03:36 PM
He got an 83. Still good

Yes it is still good.  Not sure what some people are expecting from a player priced at $306 100.
I'm holding...he's going okay and I believe that he'll soon be going better than okay.

tkringle

Quote from: enzedder on April 02, 2016, 06:37:54 PM
Quote from: bottlemart on April 02, 2016, 06:09:19 PM
Quote from: Spite on April 02, 2016, 06:03:36 PM
He got an 83. Still good

Yes it is still good.  Not sure what some people are expecting from a player priced at $306 100.
I'm holding...he's going okay and I believe that he'll soon be going better than okay.