Premium Midfield Conundrum

[fanTCfool]

That's a conundrum if ever I've seen one. Put 4 names in a hat and draw 3 out

Doss the boss cmon man pull it together!

My premos are Andrew Swallow, Jack Redden and Brenden Goddard

That's a winning formula mate! Make sure you chuck big Roughy up front, he's in for a big year!

As in J. Roughead?  ???

I like how you said 'J. Roughead', even though that does nothing to specify whether it is Jarryd or Jordan ;D

I forgot how to spell Jarryd  :P Oops

[crowls]

Danger, Gaz and Pendles for me. Fyfe's interrupted pre-season, the fact he'll spend more time up forward and the constant injury/suspension worries means I'll look to him as an upgrade target.

[crowls]

Danger, Gaz and Pendles for me. Fyfe's interrupted pre-season, the fact he'll spend more time up forward and the constant injury/suspension worries means I'll look to him as an upgrade target.

didnt last long,   my latest juggle has fyfe pendles gaj and rocky starting,   first time i have put fyfe in a team this season.

[eaglesman]

I'll solve this conundrum quickly ,,,, pick Fyfe

[_wato]

Yeah, never quite understood why so many were against starting Fyfe. He's been fit for a few weeks now and in full training. Half a game tonight, 18 touches.

Got him locked, along with Ablett, Pendles, Rocky. Ditched Gray but that's okay, Fyfe will easily outscore him.

+++ I see Fyfe as slightly underpriced after his finish to the year. Lock.

[Goosey]

I've had Pendlebury, Ablett, Priddis, Rockliff locked for weeks, probably got enough spare cash to switch Priddis to Fyfe if warranted.

[eaglesman]

Yeah, never quite understood why so many were against starting Fyfe. He's been fit for a few weeks now and in full training. Half a game tonight, 18 touches.

Got him locked, along with Ablett, Pendles, Rocky. Ditched Gray but that's okay, Fyfe will easily outscore him.

+++ I see Fyfe as slightly underpriced after his finish to the year. Lock.

Yeah I have danger over pendles

[no eye deer]

Yeah, never quite understood why so many were against starting Fyfe. He's been fit for a few weeks now and in full training. Half a game tonight, 18 touches.

Got him locked, along with Ablett, Pendles, Rocky. Ditched Gray but that's okay, Fyfe will easily outscore him.

+++ I see Fyfe as slightly underpriced after his finish to the year. Lock.

Yeah, I fooled around with having Gray instead of Fyfe, for about the first day of starting my team. Then I snapped out of it. I was kind of hoping he would start slowly in the NAB and put people off.

[eaglesman]

Yeah, never quite understood why so many were against starting Fyfe. He's been fit for a few weeks now and in full training. Half a game tonight, 18 touches.

Got him locked, along with Ablett, Pendles, Rocky. Ditched Gray but that's okay, Fyfe will easily outscore him.

+++ I see Fyfe as slightly underpriced after his finish to the year. Lock.

Yeah, I fooled around with having Gray instead of Fyfe, for about the first day of starting my team. Then I snapped out of it. I was kind of hoping he would start slowly in the NAB and put people off.

He did start slow .. Didn't even crack 70 :)

[_wato]

Yep. He is a must have. First 20 minutes he actually played he was on fire. 7 cp's, 3 clearances and 8 touches or something they were saying.

[Ringo]

Yeah, never quite understood why so many were against starting Fyfe. He's been fit for a few weeks now and in full training. Half a game tonight, 18 touches.

Got him locked, along with Ablett, Pendles, Rocky. Ditched Gray but that's okay, Fyfe will easily outscore him.

+++ I see Fyfe as slightly underpriced after his finish to the year. Lock.

Yeah, I fooled around with having Gray instead of Fyfe, for about the first day of starting my team. Then I snapped out of it. I was kind of hoping he would start slowly in the NAB and put people off.

He did start slow .. Didn't even crack 70 :)

58 from 44% time on ground will do me. 

[Woppa15]

Fyfe. Ablett. Rocky. Jelwood.

Ablett and Rocky I'd consider undervalued.
Jelwood under performed last year and I'm punting that the addition of Danger will release Jelwood and allow him to have a bit more of a free run.

[RaisyDaisy]

I've made a change to my team and now have 5 super prems, Libba and Crouch - gone weaker down back and in the forwards but boy it looks juicy

I got rid of Deledio to do it, but seeing as I am not completely certain on starting him and am not interested in any other prem forwards besides the 3 I have (Dusty, Barlow, Buddy) I reckon I might stick with this structure

This insane midfield could give me an edge in terms of starting well, or it could backfire - but I reckon it's worth stepping out of my comfort zone and going for it

[Mat0369]

I've done something similar as well and gone pretty insane in the midfield.

I had a midfield of Pendles, Gaz, Rocky, Parker, Libba, Crouch, Rookies. My team consisted of 4 premo forwards (Lids/Gunston/Barlow/Robbo) and I wanted to bring in Fyfe so I figured that is a good place to get the cash from. I also made some changes with rookies, but I effectively have a midfield and forward line that looks like this

Fyfe, Pendles, Gaz, Rocky, Parker, Libba, Crouch, Mills, Gresham, Polkinghorne, Marcon
Lids, Barlow, Robinson, Wells, Simpkin, Kerridge, Kommer, Petracca

I've also got 2 premium rucks but down back I have Bartel, Smith, Harwood, Mackenzie and rookies while I wait to see how that line shapes out.

[RaisyDaisy]

I don't know if I will be able to actually follow through with it, but currently

Bartel, Birchall, Eski/Smith, Emack
Fyfe, Danger, Pendles, Ablett, Rocky, Libba, Crouch
Goldy, NicNat
Dusty, Barlow, Buddy

Going nuts in the mids and rucks with the best of the best  8)

I'm comfortable doing this, because Lids is the only other fwd I would start but am happy to pass on (use his money to get the extra mid gun) and down back I am not paying for Shaw or McVeigh (injured) so Simmo is the only one I would pick that i don't have, but again Simmo to Eski/Smith is a small sacrifice to start that midfield