Main Menu

Laird

Started by Jacko, February 10, 2016, 04:04:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

quinny88

Quote from: Jay on June 03, 2016, 12:04:26 AM
Quote from: pies124 on June 02, 2016, 11:55:04 PM
Should i trade him in? is he a top 8 defender?

I Have
Shaw, Doch, Rance, Adams, Tipp, Lonergan, Brown, Tucker

Looking at upgrading Lonergan
He's easily top 8.

Wouldn't say easily but he is the 8th highest averaging defender at the moment.
Good price so definitely worth getting him in. I'm gonna wait a week though to see how he goes

MontyJnr

I'm not usually one to complain about scoring, but gee it seemed like Champion Data gave Rory Laird a raw deal today.

30 touches, 5 contested at 83%, 8 marks, 1 clearance, 2 inside 50's, 0 frees against and only 2 clangers for 96 AF and a measly 74 SC.

Heath Shaw tons up regularly on these stats so what is the deal? I can't recall Champion Data making an error this bad and its probably cost his owners around 25 points.

Judd Magic

Quote from: MontyJnr on June 05, 2016, 10:06:27 PM
I'm not usually one to complain about scoring, but gee it seemed like Champion Data gave Rory Laird a raw deal today.

30 touches, 5 contested at 83%, 8 marks, 1 clearance, 2 inside 50's, 0 frees against and only 2 clangers for 96 AF and a measly 74 SC.

Heath Shaw tons up regularly on these stats so what is the deal? I can't recall Champion Data making an error this bad and its probably cost his owners around 25 points.

Doesn't make sense. Waited 4 flowering weeks for Laird to come back only for CD to royally screw him over.  >:( >:(

Bully

Quote from: MontyJnr on June 05, 2016, 10:06:27 PM
I'm not usually one to complain about scoring, but gee it seemed like Champion Data gave Rory Laird a raw deal today.

30 touches, 5 contested at 83%, 8 marks, 1 clearance, 2 inside 50's, 0 frees against and only 2 clangers for 96 AF and a measly 74 SC.

Heath Shaw tons up regularly on these stats so what is the deal? I can't recall Champion Data making an error this bad and its probably cost his owners around 25 points.

More handballs than kicks, very few contested touches and very few tackles to pad out the numbers.

BoredSaint

Also more than half the adelaide team probably did more than him so his 'influence' on the game may have seemed less..

MontyJnr

Quote from: Bully on June 05, 2016, 10:12:22 PM
Quote from: MontyJnr on June 05, 2016, 10:06:27 PM
I'm not usually one to complain about scoring, but gee it seemed like Champion Data gave Rory Laird a raw deal today.

30 touches, 5 contested at 83%, 8 marks, 1 clearance, 2 inside 50's, 0 frees against and only 2 clangers for 96 AF and a measly 74 SC.

Heath Shaw tons up regularly on these stats so what is the deal? I can't recall Champion Data making an error this bad and its probably cost his owners around 25 points.

More handballs than kicks, very few contested touches and very few tackles to pad out the numbers.

Haha come on... I love how people try and justify every score as if Champion Data is immune to making errors. He was given just over 2 points for every touch and that isn't even factoring in his marks.

They stuffed up.

_wato

Don't listen to any of those responses. He got shafted.

If name was Heath Shaw, 120 game easy.

Judd Magic

Quote from: MontyJnr on June 05, 2016, 10:18:46 PM
Quote from: Bully on June 05, 2016, 10:12:22 PM
Quote from: MontyJnr on June 05, 2016, 10:06:27 PM
I'm not usually one to complain about scoring, but gee it seemed like Champion Data gave Rory Laird a raw deal today.

30 touches, 5 contested at 83%, 8 marks, 1 clearance, 2 inside 50's, 0 frees against and only 2 clangers for 96 AF and a measly 74 SC.

Heath Shaw tons up regularly on these stats so what is the deal? I can't recall Champion Data making an error this bad and its probably cost his owners around 25 points.

More handballs than kicks, very few contested touches and very few tackles to pad out the numbers.

Haha come on... I love how people try and justify every score as if Champion Data is immune to making errors. He was given just over 2 points for every touch and that isn't even factoring in his marks.

They stuffed up.

MontyJnr

Quote from: BoredSaint on June 05, 2016, 10:17:07 PM
Also more than half the adelaide team probably did more than him so his 'influence' on the game may have seemed less..

If we're judging a game on 'influence', then no Saints player should've scored over 50...

Grazz

Quote from: _wato on June 05, 2016, 10:19:27 PM
Don't listen to any of those responses. He got shafted.

If name was Heath Shaw, 120 game easy.

Amen to that.
Obviously the CD folk didn't hold him and traded him out. Royally flowered him over today.

sammy123

laird got shafted big time. was at least a 100 point game for him

Torpedo10

This really does make him a juicy upgrade target next week, doesn't it?

Grazz

Quote from: Torpedo10 on June 05, 2016, 10:29:06 PM
This really does make him a juicy upgrade target next week, doesn't it?

No stay away.  :P

fanTCfool

M Boyd, 27 Kicks 7 Handballs, 9 Marks & 0 Tackles at 79% DE - 128SC
R Laird, 11 Kicks 19 Handballs, 8 Marks & 0 Tackles at 83% DE - 74SC

SHAFTED

Torpedo10

Quote from: fanTCfool on June 05, 2016, 10:31:40 PM
M Boyd, 27 Kicks 7 Handballs, 9 Marks & 0 Tackles at 79% DE - 128SC
R Laird, 11 Kicks 19 Handballs, 8 Marks & 0 Tackles at 83% DE - 74SC

SHAFTED
Keep in mind SC really does hate handballing.

That's why Priddis will never be a 120+ player. He is a Contested Beast, Efficiency is relatively good and is a strong mark. He doesn't kick anywhere near enough.

I think Laird deserved a 95, probably not much more than that though.