2016 British xv Discussion thread

Started by Torpedo10, February 08, 2016, 11:16:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ringo

Voting has now been completed with one coach not voting and 2 coaches happy with either approach.

Votes cast
Option 1 Naming OOP players only 10 votes
Option 2 Naming Full team including OOP 3 votes.

So if playing players OOP you will need to list in the Weekly match day thread.


Ringo

PK has raised a valid point concerning HGA with the UF scoring we have a very possibility that one team can have a HGA of 100+ Think this is quite an advantage so just wondering whether we should divide by 2 to be a little more fairer.

Comments welcome and if we have consensus will adjust.

been tied up with quite a few other matters as well and only just noticed that the draw that UF has done is not very even Breakers do not mind though as we get all home games,  Will be doing a draw myself and then seeing if I can put into UF.  (First lesson learned in UF draw not even for HGA).

nostradamus

Why not just do away with it ?? .......problem solved  8)

Pkbaldy

To save you the worry of doing it for the draw, might as well just flick it off?

I assumed UF had done that draw evenly so it wouldn't have been much effort... haha

Ringo

Please just say here if you want to do away with it or options for discussions here.  have no strong ways one way or the other.


SydneyRox


Pkbaldy


nrich102


LF




kilbluff1985


GoLions

Sorry been pretty busy. I'm happy to lose hga, especially as I lost like 2 games because of it last year (out of 3 iirc)

Ringo

So consensus is to do away with it so there is no HGA for this season.

GoLions

Quote from: Ringo on March 29, 2016, 04:18:32 PM
So consensus is to do away with it so there is no HGA for this season.
I would suggest still sending out a PM as some coaches are still yet to respond.

I'm not fussed either way, but some might really want to keep it, which wouldn't surprise me as we're taking away that "home and away" feel