Main Menu

Toby Greene

Started by wceagles, February 06, 2016, 07:21:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Speculator

Quote from: elephants on March 31, 2016, 05:01:24 PM
Quote from: Speculator on March 31, 2016, 04:02:38 PM
Quote from: jeesh on March 31, 2016, 03:29:37 PM
Hope he gets dropped he'll make the perfect loophole

You'd prefer a loophole to a premium/sub-premium player? Interesting.

If that sub premium is popping 50s lol

Unlikely to score 50s every week. If you don't like his scoring why wouldn't you trade him to someone better? Sometimes you can't even utilise the loophole due to timing of games etc. I just don't understand the logic of preferring a loophole to an actual player. You would only be loopholing rookie scores anyway.

Ricochet

Quote from: Speculator on March 31, 2016, 05:28:04 PM
Quote from: elephants on March 31, 2016, 05:01:24 PM
Quote from: Speculator on March 31, 2016, 04:02:38 PM
Quote from: jeesh on March 31, 2016, 03:29:37 PM
Hope he gets dropped he'll make the perfect loophole

You'd prefer a loophole to a premium/sub-premium player? Interesting.

If that sub premium is popping 50s lol

Unlikely to score 50s every week. If you don't like his scoring why wouldn't you trade him to someone better? Sometimes you can't even utilise the loophole due to timing of games etc. I just don't understand the logic of preferring a loophole to an actual player. You would only be loopholing rookie scores anyway.

Because you can loophole Greene and if your rookie does well you keep Greene. If your rookie struggles, then trade Greene to a premo

LordSneeze

Quote from: Ricochet on March 31, 2016, 05:29:35 PM
Quote from: Speculator on March 31, 2016, 05:28:04 PM
Quote from: elephants on March 31, 2016, 05:01:24 PM
Quote from: Speculator on March 31, 2016, 04:02:38 PM
Quote from: jeesh on March 31, 2016, 03:29:37 PM
Hope he gets dropped he'll make the perfect loophole

You'd prefer a loophole to a premium/sub-premium player? Interesting.

If that sub premium is popping 50s lol

Unlikely to score 50s every week. If you don't like his scoring why wouldn't you trade him to someone better? Sometimes you can't even utilise the loophole due to timing of games etc. I just don't understand the logic of preferring a loophole to an actual player. You would only be loopholing rookie scores anyway.

Because you can loophole Greene and if your rookie does well you keep Greene. If your rookie struggles, then trade Greene to a premo

If he is indeed dropped this is my plan with Menadue this week.

elephants

Quote from: Speculator on March 31, 2016, 05:28:04 PM
Quote from: elephants on March 31, 2016, 05:01:24 PM
Quote from: Speculator on March 31, 2016, 04:02:38 PM
Quote from: jeesh on March 31, 2016, 03:29:37 PM
Hope he gets dropped he'll make the perfect loophole

You'd prefer a loophole to a premium/sub-premium player? Interesting.

If that sub premium is popping 50s lol

Unlikely to score 50s every week. If you don't like his scoring why wouldn't you trade him to someone better? Sometimes you can't even utilise the loophole due to timing of games etc. I just don't understand the logic of preferring a loophole to an actual player. You would only be loopholing rookie scores anyway.

For the record, I don't have Greene. But taking the loophole is making the best of a bad situation.

Speculator

I'm actually taking the loophole aswell but would prefer Greene to be playing and scoring well.

tkringle

Greene is named this week. Hopefully comes good

LordSneeze

Yay, no loophole and no trade.

kfewster

I still think im going to go Greene to Hall.

Think i picked the wrong player from the start.

Hall seems to be in good form at the moment following on from the last 6 games last year and i believe will score more then Greene throughout the year.

Jackross10


MC

Quote from: kfewster on April 02, 2016, 10:26:24 AM
I still think im going to go Greene to Hall.

Think i picked the wrong player from the start.

Hall seems to be in good form at the moment following on from the last 6 games last year and i believe will score more then Greene throughout the year.

Surely this statement is retracted now?

Jimmykidd

could easily see him back in the fwd line through the year. looked like he edged out shiel at center bounces today. much to my disappointment

dmac07

Surely I didn't doubt this kid for a second...  ;)

Chonks

Cmon son, give us something definitive to whether to keep you or not !

Grufflez

He doesn't use the ball well hence the bad DE%/Clanger counts that is why GWS didn't have him playing perm midfield in the first place.
He is another accumulator.

Millsy999

What are peoples thoughts on Greene? Pretty disappointing so far with 51, 120, 52. Looks like if I stick fat with him it could be a bit of a rollercoaster ride. Plenty of cash in the kitty and can pretty much go Greene to whomever I choose.........very tempted by a Greene to Zorko trade this week. I would prefer not to trade this week after using 2 last week, but I think Zorko is more likely to be a F3/F4 keeper as opposed to Greene..........

Cheers
Millsy