Best ___ for ___

[RaisyDaisy]

Best 2 players for their position that are most likely to play 22 games....

Def: Shaw, ...
Mid: Pendles, JPK
Ruck: Goldy, Sauce
FWD: Hoff, Dusty

... = Simmo. Tmac and Houli are durable too

[MC]

Best 2 players for their position that are most likely to play 22 games....

Current games streaks:

http://afltables.com/afl/stats/succgames.html


Of note:

Gaff - 104
Jacobs - 75
Rampe - 71
Hoff - 56
Houli - 54
Danger - 50
Wingard - 43
Dahl - 41
Rance - 40

[Grufflez]

Best 2 players for their position that are most likely to play 22 games....

Def: Shaw, ...
Mid: Pendles, JPK
Ruck: Goldy, Sauce
FWD: Hoff, Dusty

... = Simmo. Tmac and Houli are durable too

I like them all minus shaw, i have Houli at the moment but am unsure about Yarran when he returns.

[Grufflez]

Best 2 players for their position that are most likely to play 22 games....

Current games streaks:

http://afltables.com/afl/stats/succgames.html


Of note:

Gaff - 104
Jacobs - 75
Rampe - 71
Hoff - 56
Houli - 54
Danger - 50
Wingard - 43
Dahl - 41
Rance - 40

^ Some real durable players there to consider, cheers.

[DaveElNacho]

Best 2 players for their position that are most likely to play 22 games....

Def: Shaw, Houli
Mid: Pendles, JPK
Ruck: Goldy, Sauce
FWD: Hoff, Dusty

... = Simmo. Tmac and Houli are durable too

Was thinking Simmo but he played 20 games last year and he's almost 32 years old. Doesn't exactly scream "most likely to play 22". But yeah, good call on the other two. I'll put Houli in there

[_wato]

Best 2 players for their position that are most likely to play 22 games....

Def: Shaw, Houli
Mid: Pendles, JPK
Ruck: Goldy, Sauce
FWD: Hoff, Dusty

... = Simmo. Tmac and Houli are durable too

Was thinking Simmo but he played 20 games last year and he's almost 32 years old. Doesn't exactly scream "most likely to play 22". But yeah, good call on the other two. I'll put Houli in there

He's played 215 of his last 220 games. He's the most durable there is lol

[no eye deer]

Best mid under $588,000. Got Rocky. Lean towards Sidey at this stage, but there's a few others in the mix.

[MC]

Best mid under $588,000. Got Rocky. Lean towards Sidey at this stage, but there's a few others in the mix.

Sidey a bit of an uncertainty with Treloar coming in, might be floating across HB more often. I like Gaff at his price, fitness freak who will more than likely benefit from the new sub/interchange rules. Otherwise T Mitch looks pretty good as well.

[supercoachhelp]

Best mid under $588,000. Got Rocky. Lean towards Sidey at this stage, but there's a few others in the mix.

Sidey a bit of an uncertainty with Treloar coming in, might be floating across HB more often. I like Gaff at his price, fitness freak who will more than likely benefit from the new sub/interchange rules. Otherwise T Mitch looks pretty good as well.

Sloane, Jelwood, Wines maybe

[Bully]

Have to say that the case for Harwood gets stronger for me, if he is selected round 1 I think I will be picking him for my D4 selection. Have mulled over Smith, Rich, Malceski and even Trent McKenzie but Harwood is the one who makes the most sense. Job security is a worry but he only needs to get his price up around $430k to justify the selection. Is he capable? I think so.

In 2014 he averaged 83, this also included a sub affected match in round 1, from round 12 his scores were comparable to all the best running defenders, this included 5 tons. If he manages to replicate his 2014 he will hit $439k by round 9, a perfect time to upgrade to a McVeigh, Shaw or Boyd. With rookies on the expensive side this year I think a caclulated risk is in order and a guy like Harwood screams value to me.   

I will also add he just signed a 2 year contract which indicates he is in the club's long term plans.

[Ringo]

Harwood is on my watch list and will come in if named for Rd 1.  My only concern is the competition for his spot Cutler, Harwood, Lester and McGrath fighting for 2 spots.  Claye Beams will also come in to calculations when fully fit as well.
Big Harwood fan myself.

[RaisyDaisy]

This love for harwood is crazy

Has never played more than 16 games and is not guaranteed a spot.

Hanging on to the hope that he will all of a sudden become a great pick because of a few previous tons seems extremely wishful

[fanTCfool]

This love for harwood is crazy

Has never played more than 16 games and is not guaranteed a spot.

Hanging on to the hope that he will all of a sudden become a great pick because of a few previous tons seems extremely wishful

Have recently pulled the pin on Harwood and have gone for a more set backline,
I've mentioned it before but there is every chance he is the 2016 Brett Goodes who I fell for last year.

[plumdog millionaire]

This love for harwood is crazy

Has never played more than 16 games and is not guaranteed a spot.

Hanging on to the hope that he will all of a sudden become a great pick because of a few previous tons seems extremely wishful

He's got more scoring ability than EMack but worse JS. If he plays the first 10+ games he's a good pick
Everyone brings up when guys aren't proven but he's a guy who has scored well when playing full games, as recently as last year

[RaisyDaisy]

This love for harwood is crazy

Has never played more than 16 games and is not guaranteed a spot.

Hanging on to the hope that he will all of a sudden become a great pick because of a few previous tons seems extremely wishful

He's got more scoring ability than EMack but worse JS. If he plays the first 10+ games he's a good pick
Everyone brings up when guys aren't proven but he's a guy who has scored well when playing full games, as recently as last year

I'm not doubting his scoring ability at all, but it doesnt count for much if he isn't best 22

No one is picking EMack for his scoring ability (Well yes he can score decent but it's his JS that has him valuable)