2016 Coaches Choice

[batt]

Don't have 2,8,9,12,14

[AaronKirk]

Current Top 15
1. Liberatore 55.38%
2. Petracca 55.05%
3. Ablett 50.34%
4. M Brown (Essendon) 47.40%
5. Kerridge 44.43%
6. Dustin Martin 40.05%
7. Rockliff 38.26%
8. Lobbe 27.78%
9. O'Meara 27.70%
10. B Crouch 27.06%
11. Wells 26.99%
12. Parish 26.33%
13. Pendlebury 26.19%
14. Dangerfield 25.07%
15. Goldstein 24.10%

love that lobbe is soo high and that goldy is soo low. Not sure on the JOM punt. he is only 100k more then parish mills hopper though.

got 12 of the top 15.

Sounds like you have pretty high expectations of Parish & Mills, I think both will be in the 65-75 region, nowhere near a fully fit O'Meara.

True, but if JOM doesn't play round 1 (which he won't IMO) is he a relevant option?

I have 11/15. Currently don't have Lobbe (got annihilated in intraclub by Dougal Howard), Parish, JOM or Danger

Time to get around him?

Off 1 intra club game? no. But keep an eye on him in the NAB challenge.

Not picking Lobbe unless I see something decent from him in the NAB games.

[Hawker_08]

I think that at this point in time, JOM not playing round 1 is perfect. I really want to go 5 deep in mid (Fyfe, Ablett, Pendles, Rocky and Wines) and if JOM is playing he is a lock so I'd have to find a way to get him in. When he comes back from injury we can 1. wait 1-2 games to see if he is alright, 2. downgrade an underperfoming/injured player and have a similar output or 3. sideways a rookie and increase our scoring by 15-20 ppg. I actually really want him to start in NEAFL and come up at round 4-5.

[Ringo]

Do not have Petracca. O'Meara, Crouch, Parish, Dangerfield.  Crouch may come in for Lobbe if he continues to stink in NAB cup.

[greenday82]

I don't have JOM, Lobbe, Crouch and Danger but I do have the rest, so all good so far.

[essendon2]

Current Top 15
1. Liberatore 55.38%
2. Petracca 55.05%
3. Ablett 50.34%
4. M Brown (Essendon) 47.40%
5. Kerridge 44.43%
6. Dustin Martin 40.05%
7. Rockliff 38.26%
8. Lobbe 27.78%
9. O'Meara 27.70%
10. B Crouch 27.06%
11. Wells 26.99%
12. Parish 26.33%
13. Pendlebury 26.19%
14. Dangerfield 25.07%
15. Goldstein 24.10%

9/15 for me atm ::)

Don't have Dusty, JOM, Parish, Pendles, Danger, Goldy

[Bully]

Lobbe is the one who will make or break the seaon for many coaches. If he makes 80k & Goldy sheds 100k then it becomes a worthwhile gamble. If Goldy has a moderate drop and Lobbe stagnates it will be season on the line. The problem with mid price rucks is that your caught in no-mans land when it comes to sideways trading, you effectively need to burn two trades to get out of trouble. 

[Money Shot]

Really didn't expect Parish too be that high, I personally don't think he will be that good a scorer. Don't know why though hahaha

[Goosey]

11/15. Don't have Lobbe, JOM, Danger or Parish.

[Money Shot]

13/15 :o
At first I wasn't going to start wells because I saw him as too big a risk, however I feel more confident knowing that 25% of the comp is taking the punt on him. Now it would be more of a risk not too start him 8)

Not starting Lobbe and Parish.

Although I want too start Parish Crouch is my 9th mid and I don't intend on spending 200k for a player too sit on the bench.

[Marstar]

11/15. Core of the team is looking Vanilla.

I think structure around D3/D4 , M4/5, F3/4 and R2 will be the POD.

Everyone seems to be going cheap in the backline which is causing a lot of variation. I'd argue that there isn't really a vanilla D1/D2. And who is the vanilla F2?

I agree with that D is looking a lot more diverse now, but Shaw is dominating D1.

Up front It's not a case of vanilla F2, but rather 2 of Martin, Dahlhaus and Barlow will most peoples F1/F2 .. in not all 3 to F3.

[DaveElNacho]

11/15. Core of the team is looking Vanilla.

I think structure around D3/D4 , M4/5, F3/4 and R2 will be the POD.

Everyone seems to be going cheap in the backline which is causing a lot of variation. I'd argue that there isn't really a vanilla D1/D2. And who is the vanilla F2?

I agree with that D is looking a lot more diverse now, but Shaw is dominating D1.

Up front It's not a case of vanilla F2, but rather 2 of Martin, Dahlhaus and Barlow will most peoples F1/F2 .. in not all 3 to F3.

Yeah, very good points.

[Holz]

11/15. Core of the team is looking Vanilla.

I think structure around D3/D4 , M4/5, F3/4 and R2 will be the POD.

Everyone seems to be going cheap in the backline which is causing a lot of variation. I'd argue that there isn't really a vanilla D1/D2. And who is the vanilla F2?

I agree with that D is looking a lot more diverse now, but Shaw is dominating D1.

Up front It's not a case of vanilla F2, but rather 2 of Martin, Dahlhaus and Barlow will most peoples F1/F2 .. in not all 3 to F3.

Yeah, very good points.

is it really see nobody with dahl

Lids martin Barlow will be super popular as will buddy.

[enzedder]

Lids, Martin, Barlow for me.
Pick themselves really.

[Holz]

Lids, Martin, Barlow for me.
Pick themselves really.

does this worry you at all about lids?

2013: 103.5
2014: 102.9

2014: 4 games missed
2015: 5 games missed