2016 Coaches Choice

Started by Gigantor, January 30, 2016, 02:44:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Capper

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 03, 2016, 04:30:07 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 03, 2016, 11:36:52 AM
Quote from: _wato on March 02, 2016, 08:52:49 PM
Yeah I think Cox could get a game before Witts this year.
wow really??

It's possible, but either way Cox is not good pick for SC. Can't loophole when Collingwood play so many early games and won't score/play enough to make enough $$
But the 2 teams with mainly Sat/sun games are Suns, Dees, Saints, Lions and Blues (apart from R1)

The suns have 4 sunday games and the rest on sat

No real targets there though. I dont like Currie's chances

Bully

Quote from: Capper on March 03, 2016, 05:08:56 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 03, 2016, 04:30:07 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 03, 2016, 11:36:52 AM
Quote from: _wato on March 02, 2016, 08:52:49 PM
Yeah I think Cox could get a game before Witts this year.
wow really??

It's possible, but either way Cox is not good pick for SC. Can't loophole when Collingwood play so many early games and won't score/play enough to make enough $$
But the 2 teams with mainly Sat/sun games are Suns, Dees, Saints, Lions and Blues (apart from R1)

The suns have 4 sunday games and the rest on sat

No real targets there though. I dont like Currie's chances

What's the point in having a Suns rookie when you want to be loopholing Gaz? For what it's worth I have done the reasearch and Collingwood are a decent team to use for loophole purposes.

Ringo

Regarding loopholing not really worrying about a floating donut as invariably one of my 30 players does not play and I can use them anyway. Failed me only twice last year but difference in points was not that great.

Holz

Quote from: Torpedo10 on February 28, 2016, 10:22:38 AM
How is Simpkin not in that Top 20.  :o

because simpkin isnt a good pick for those who know what they are doing and casual people would have no clue who he is.

Ricochet

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 03, 2016, 04:30:07 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 03, 2016, 11:36:52 AM
Quote from: _wato on March 02, 2016, 08:52:49 PM
Yeah I think Cox could get a game before Witts this year.
wow really??

It's possible, but either way Cox is not good pick for SC. Can't loophole when Collingwood play so many early games and won't score/play enough to make enough $$
Witts can give Grundy a run for his money. It's surprising to hear he's dropped off that much

AaronKirk

Quote from: Holz on March 03, 2016, 05:54:42 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on February 28, 2016, 10:22:38 AM
How is Simpkin not in that Top 20.  :o

because simpkin isnt a good pick for those who know what they are doing and casual people would have no clue who he is.

Please elaborate on this?

He has an unsubbed career average in the 80s

He is in my team ATM.

Holz

Quote from: AaronKirk on March 03, 2016, 06:32:42 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 03, 2016, 05:54:42 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on February 28, 2016, 10:22:38 AM
How is Simpkin not in that Top 20.  :o

because simpkin isnt a good pick for those who know what they are doing and casual people would have no clue who he is.

Please elaborate on this?

He has an unsubbed career average in the 80s

He is in my team ATM.

I know about the unsubbed average. I posted it a while ago.

He isnt a no but pricey and didnt look great in the nab 1. He is out but can make his way in.

Like cockatoo kennedy and maybe menadue for cheaper. Wells i love at a little more.

Defintely a nab watchlist but not a top 20 option

enzedder

Quote from: AaronKirk on March 03, 2016, 06:32:42 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 03, 2016, 05:54:42 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on February 28, 2016, 10:22:38 AM
How is Simpkin not in that Top 20.  :o

because simpkin isnt a good pick for those who know what they are doing and casual people would have no clue who he is.

Please elaborate on this?

He has an unsubbed career average in the 80s

He is in my team ATM.
Either you or Holz don't have a clue what you're doing lol. :o
I had him but don't now as I've restructured a bit but his unsubbed scoring means he will likely be a good pick in my opinion.

Holz

Quote from: enzedder on March 03, 2016, 06:43:25 PM
Quote from: AaronKirk on March 03, 2016, 06:32:42 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 03, 2016, 05:54:42 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on February 28, 2016, 10:22:38 AM
How is Simpkin not in that Top 20.  :o

because simpkin isnt a good pick for those who know what they are doing and casual people would have no clue who he is.

Please elaborate on this?

He has an unsubbed career average in the 80s

He is in my team ATM.
Either you or Holz don't have a clue what you're doing lol. :o
I had him but don't now as I've restructured a bit but his unsubbed scoring means he will likely be a good pick in my opinion.

Im not saying he is a bad pick but not saying he is a good pick yet. Alot of forwards have shown more so at this stage he is out. Can easily come back in. Was just saying no way shpuld he be top 20 popularity

RaisyDaisy

Simpkin and Anderson have not been in my team once.  Wells and cheaper options for me

enzedder

Quote from: Holz on March 03, 2016, 07:26:15 PM
Quote from: enzedder on March 03, 2016, 06:43:25 PM
Quote from: AaronKirk on March 03, 2016, 06:32:42 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 03, 2016, 05:54:42 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on February 28, 2016, 10:22:38 AM
How is Simpkin not in that Top 20.  :o

because simpkin isnt a good pick for those who know what they are doing and casual people would have no clue who he is.

Please elaborate on this?

He has an unsubbed career average in the 80s

He is in my team ATM.
Either you or Holz don't have a clue what you're doing lol. :o
I had him but don't now as I've restructured a bit but his unsubbed scoring means he will likely be a good pick in my opinion.

Im not saying he is a bad pick but not saying he is a good pick yet. Alot of forwards have shown more so at this stage he is out. Can easily come back in. Was just saying no way shpuld he be top 20 popularity
Fair enough mate. I agree with that. Like AK I wasn't exactly sure what you were on about.

LordSneeze

Quote from: enzedder on March 03, 2016, 08:00:12 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 03, 2016, 07:26:15 PM
Quote from: enzedder on March 03, 2016, 06:43:25 PM
Quote from: AaronKirk on March 03, 2016, 06:32:42 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 03, 2016, 05:54:42 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on February 28, 2016, 10:22:38 AM
How is Simpkin not in that Top 20.  :o

because simpkin isnt a good pick for those who know what they are doing and casual people would have no clue who he is.

Please elaborate on this?

He has an unsubbed career average in the 80s

He is in my team ATM.
Either you or Holz don't have a clue what you're doing lol. :o
I had him but don't now as I've restructured a bit but his unsubbed scoring means he will likely be a good pick in my opinion.

Im not saying he is a bad pick but not saying he is a good pick yet. Alot of forwards have shown more so at this stage he is out. Can easily come back in. Was just saying no way shpuld he be top 20 popularity
Fair enough mate. I agree with that. Like AK I wasn't exactly sure what you were on about.
Def should not be a top 20 selection. People are writing rookies at 190k because they are too expensive, he wont score that much better than some of the rookies.

pies124

Can someone please tell me the ownership % for Jesse Lonergan?

AaronKirk

Quote from: LordSneeze on March 03, 2016, 10:19:10 PM
Quote from: enzedder on March 03, 2016, 08:00:12 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 03, 2016, 07:26:15 PM
Quote from: enzedder on March 03, 2016, 06:43:25 PM
Quote from: AaronKirk on March 03, 2016, 06:32:42 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 03, 2016, 05:54:42 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on February 28, 2016, 10:22:38 AM
How is Simpkin not in that Top 20.  :o

because simpkin isnt a good pick for those who know what they are doing and casual people would have no clue who he is.

Please elaborate on this?

He has an unsubbed career average in the 80s

He is in my team ATM.
Either you or Holz don't have a clue what you're doing lol. :o
I had him but don't now as I've restructured a bit but his unsubbed scoring means he will likely be a good pick in my opinion.

Im not saying he is a bad pick but not saying he is a good pick yet. Alot of forwards have shown more so at this stage he is out. Can easily come back in. Was just saying no way shpuld he be top 20 popularity
Fair enough mate. I agree with that. Like AK I wasn't exactly sure what you were on about.
Def should not be a top 20 selection. People are writing rookies at 190k because they are too expensive, he wont score that much better than some of the rookies.

I'm not saying he is a lock either. If there are cheaper options which I am confident with he will be the 1st to go. At this stage there are not.

Quote from: pies124 on March 03, 2016, 11:22:06 PM
Can someone please tell me the ownership % for Jesse Lonergan?

3.65%

Ricochet

Quote from: AaronKirk on March 04, 2016, 12:54:37 AM
Quote from: pies124 on March 03, 2016, 11:22:06 PM
Can someone please tell me the ownership % for Jesse Lonergan?

3.65%
Actually thought it may be a bit higher than that prior to his injury last night