Main Menu

Ollie Wines

Started by Hawker_08, January 30, 2016, 01:49:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Bully

Quote from: Holz on March 02, 2016, 04:59:09 PM
Rory Sloane

44k more expensive.

2014: 114.7 avergae
2015: 112.6 average unsubeed (some games are injury affected)

started the year 139.7 from 3 games
ended the year 122.4 from 5 games.

why cross your fingers for 110+ when you have 110-115 just sitting there for 44k more.

No Danger however, this may lead to more attention heaped on Sloane.

Holz

Quote from: Bully on March 02, 2016, 05:04:07 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 02, 2016, 04:59:09 PM
Rory Sloane

44k more expensive.

2014: 114.7 avergae
2015: 112.6 average unsubeed (some games are injury affected)

started the year 139.7 from 3 games
ended the year 122.4 from 5 games.

why cross your fingers for 110+ when you have 110-115 just sitting there for 44k more.

No Danger however, this may lead to more attention heaped on Sloane.

or he gets more of the ball being the go to guy.


enzedder

Quote from: Holz on March 02, 2016, 04:59:09 PM
Rory Sloane

44k more expensive.

2014: 114.7 avergae
2015: 112.6 average unsubeed (some games are injury affected)

started the year 139.7 from 3 games
ended the year 122.4 from 5 games.

why cross your fingers for 110+ when you have 110-115 just sitting there for 44k more.
They'll be similar. Wines is probably the better pick because he is 44k cheaper. 8)
I'm not crossing my fingers about it... Pretty confident actually that there's no risk involved.

LordSneeze

Quote from: Holz on March 02, 2016, 05:10:05 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 02, 2016, 05:04:07 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 02, 2016, 04:59:09 PM
Rory Sloane

44k more expensive.

2014: 114.7 avergae
2015: 112.6 average unsubeed (some games are injury affected)

started the year 139.7 from 3 games
ended the year 122.4 from 5 games.

why cross your fingers for 110+ when you have 110-115 just sitting there for 44k more.

No Danger however, this may lead to more attention heaped on Sloane.

or he gets more of the ball being the go to guy.

To me Sloane will get the attention, Brad Crouch will be the cheap pick that get the attention that hits a solid 90 averages, Matt Crouch will breakout and average the 105-110 mark.

Im surprised he is in 6.9% of teams though.

Holz

For the record only going the besy of the best

Rocky pendles ablett fyfe locked.

Going jpk as pricey m5 but can go 115-120 as upside. Downside is 105-110

Marstar

Quote from: Holz on March 03, 2016, 12:05:35 PM
For the record only going the besy of the best

Rocky pendles ablett fyfe locked.

Going jpk as pricey m5 but can go 115-120 as upside. Downside is 105-110

Made that move myself last week. Started with Wines ... found the cash for sloane ... scrapped another midprice and upgraded to JPK.

GnR for me this year. Just need them named R1 :D

Spite

Quote from: Holz on March 02, 2016, 04:59:09 PM
Rory Sloane

44k more expensive.

2014: 114.7 avergae
2015: 112.6 average unsubeed (some games are injury affected)

started the year 139.7 from 3 games
ended the year 122.4 from 5 games.

why cross your fingers for 110+ when you have 110-115 just sitting there for 44k more.

Taking out injury affected games over the last two years, the guy averages 91.8 in losses. The real question here is, how many games do you think Adelaide will win?

Pokerface

is no Ryder, just Lobbe and his wayward taps a factor in picking Wines this year?

Marstar

Quote from: Pokerface on March 04, 2016, 01:50:00 AM
is no Ryder, just Lobbe and his wayward taps a factor in picking Wines this year?

Both had there best SC year in 2014 averaging 100.

Make of that what you will.

quinny88

Quote from: Spite on March 03, 2016, 12:48:03 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 02, 2016, 04:59:09 PM
Rory Sloane

44k more expensive.

2014: 114.7 avergae
2015: 112.6 average unsubeed (some games are injury affected)

started the year 139.7 from 3 games
ended the year 122.4 from 5 games.

why cross your fingers for 110+ when you have 110-115 just sitting there for 44k more.

Taking out injury affected games over the last two years, the guy averages 91.8 in losses. The real question here is, how many games do you think Adelaide will win?

It's not like they are gonna fall off the face of the earth and finish bottom because Dangers gone (like some people seem to think)
Adelaide will still win plenty of games and I'm confident Sloane averages 105 at the lowest but predicting closer to 110. He's a gun

Spite

Quote from: quinny88 on March 04, 2016, 03:54:48 AM
Quote from: Spite on March 03, 2016, 12:48:03 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 02, 2016, 04:59:09 PM
Rory Sloane

44k more expensive.

2014: 114.7 avergae
2015: 112.6 average unsubeed (some games are injury affected)

started the year 139.7 from 3 games
ended the year 122.4 from 5 games.

why cross your fingers for 110+ when you have 110-115 just sitting there for 44k more.

Taking out injury affected games over the last two years, the guy averages 91.8 in losses. The real question here is, how many games do you think Adelaide will win?

It's not like they are gonna fall off the face of the earth and finish bottom because Dangers gone (like some people seem to think)
Adelaide will still win plenty of games and I'm confident Sloane averages 105 at the lowest but predicting closer to 110. He's a gun

Ok so put it this way then. Adelaide have the toughest 8 round draw. They could conceivably be 2-6. Sloane could be averaging around 95 by then and you could pick him up for 450k before their draw turns.

Why would you start him knowing he does so badly in losses and they have the toughest opening draw?

Ricochet

Quote from: Spite on March 04, 2016, 10:05:01 AM
Quote from: quinny88 on March 04, 2016, 03:54:48 AM
Quote from: Spite on March 03, 2016, 12:48:03 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 02, 2016, 04:59:09 PM
Rory Sloane

44k more expensive.

2014: 114.7 avergae
2015: 112.6 average unsubeed (some games are injury affected)

started the year 139.7 from 3 games
ended the year 122.4 from 5 games.

why cross your fingers for 110+ when you have 110-115 just sitting there for 44k more.

Taking out injury affected games over the last two years, the guy averages 91.8 in losses. The real question here is, how many games do you think Adelaide will win?

It's not like they are gonna fall off the face of the earth and finish bottom because Dangers gone (like some people seem to think)
Adelaide will still win plenty of games and I'm confident Sloane averages 105 at the lowest but predicting closer to 110. He's a gun

Ok so put it this way then. Adelaide have the toughest 8 round draw. They could conceivably be 2-6. Sloane could be averaging around 95 by then and you could pick him up for 450k before their draw turns.

Why would you start him knowing he does so badly in losses and they have the toughest opening draw?
Yeh I'm with Spite on this one Quinn. He has a disgusting opening draw

TexR74


IntegralX

Quote from: TexR74 on March 06, 2016, 06:00:22 PM
Wines vs Viney?

Wines all day, no contest.

On that note I'd rather spend the extra cash and grab Parker over Wines.

Keeper27

Quote from: IntegralX on March 07, 2016, 03:43:11 AM
Quote from: TexR74 on March 06, 2016, 06:00:22 PM
Wines vs Viney?

Wines all day, no contest.

really?? i seriously only see both guys going 105-ish.
and the fact that Viney is almost $30K cheaper makes him the better option.


Quote from: IntegralX on March 07, 2016, 03:43:11 AMOn that note I'd rather spend the extra cash and grab Parker over Wines.

yes, this.