FF Dream Team Draft League 2016.

[nas]

Fair comments by both so how about this as a compromise.

We name 14 players on field 4D/5M/1R/4F with 4 emergencies named each week. No real disadvantage then to any one.

Probably fairest way to do it

Fair comments by both so how about this as a compromise.

We name 14 players on field 4D/5M/1R/4F with 4 emergencies named each week. No real disadvantage then to any one.

I quite like this, everyone who went for a Utility went for a Mid, so that probably works nicely.
Realistically, most will have an emergency in each line, so 4 emergencies works well too.

Fair comments by both so how about this as a compromise.

We name 14 players on field 4D/5M/1R/4F with 4 emergencies named each week. No real disadvantage then to any one.

Not quite the majority as yet, I agree which levels the playing field, so up to the rest to comment wether this is accepted!

[LF]

Fair comments by both so how about this as a compromise.

We name 14 players on field 4D/5M/1R/4F with 4 emergencies named each week. No real disadvantage then to any one.

Yeah fine by me

[nas]

Fair comments by both so how about this as a compromise.

We name 14 players on field 4D/5M/1R/4F with 4 emergencies named each week. No real disadvantage then to any one.

Probably fairest way to do it

Fair comments by both so how about this as a compromise.

We name 14 players on field 4D/5M/1R/4F with 4 emergencies named each week. No real disadvantage then to any one.

I quite like this, everyone who went for a Utility went for a Mid, so that probably works nicely.
Realistically, most will have an emergency in each line, so 4 emergencies works well too.

Fair comments by both so how about this as a compromise.

We name 14 players on field 4D/5M/1R/4F with 4 emergencies named each week. No real disadvantage then to any one.

Not quite the majority as yet, I agree which levels the playing field, so up to the rest to comment wether this is accepted!

Fair comments by both so how about this as a compromise.

We name 14 players on field 4D/5M/1R/4F with 4 emergencies named each week. No real disadvantage then to any one.

Well by my calculations that makes 5, so if no objections, in bold is the way we carry on. Whenever your ready fanTCfool your up as well as a pm.

Yeah fine by me

[fanTCfool]

Won't be long!  ;D

[fanTCfool]

Hamish Hartlett please

[Qldr]

Dane Rampe

[nas]

Clancee Pearce > Emerg.

[Ringo]

Josh Gibson and Tom Langdon

[nas]

Steven Motlop > Bench thanks.

[Qldr]

Kieren Jack

[fanTCfool]

Tom McDonald please

[Ringo]

Tom McDonald please

Was a toss up between both Toms for me McDonald and Langdon. Wanted Rampe but Qldr got in first

[fanTCfool]

Tom McDonald please

Was a toss up between both Toms for me McDonald and Langdon. Wanted Rampe but Qldr got in first

Had Langdon above McDonald myself, pleased to have either though.

[Pkbaldy]

I'll grab Dylan Shiel

[LF]

Mark Lecras