Main Menu

Defence Talk

Started by RaisyDaisy, December 29, 2015, 08:35:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Bully

Quote from: Holz on March 13, 2016, 02:50:54 PM
Shaw bartel rancec harwood weits brown (hartley mcdonald tippa)

Adams up front.

Safe as houses.

Very nice but very expensive.

RaisyDaisy

RE: comments about Dea and his JS

No doubt I expect people who follow Essendon closely would have more insight that myself, but at the same time I don't think any of them would have a clue as to how Woosha is actually going to structure things up

I can easily turn Dea into Weits, EMack etc but if I can get away with saving the cash by playing Dea then I'll do that

fanTCfool

Quote from: Bully on March 13, 2016, 03:02:34 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 13, 2016, 02:50:54 PM
Shaw bartel rancec harwood weits brown (hartley mcdonald tippa)

Adams up front.

Safe as houses.

Very nice but very expensive.

It's very minor, but I would prefer McDonald Tipungwuti forward as to not have too many Bombers down back.

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: Bully on March 13, 2016, 03:02:34 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 13, 2016, 02:50:54 PM
Shaw bartel rancec harwood weits brown (hartley mcdonald tippa)

Adams up front.

Safe as houses.

Very nice but very expensive.

Similar to me

Shaw, Laird, Bartel, Dea, Brown, Hartley (Broad, Adams)

Might be outlaying a tad more than those going with the mid price options, but we save a trade or so too

As usual, it's how you're entire team is set up and not just line by line.

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: fanTCfool on March 13, 2016, 03:06:20 PM
It's very minor, but I would prefer McDonald Tipungwuti forward as to not have too many Bombers down back.

LOL, doesn't mean anything. The Adams/Tippa combo (which I am running too) essentially means they're both at F8 and D8

Ringo

I am taking a risk with my defence set up and at the moment this is it but may change by Rd 1.

Shaw, McGovern, Grundy, Harwood, Brown, Hartley, Broad, Adams with Tip at F8.  Grundy I think will be the main beneficiary with Rhyce Shaws retirement and could step up. Has looked good in the NAB. 

nostradamus

Quote from: Ringo on March 13, 2016, 03:44:13 PM
I am taking a risk with my defence set up and at the moment this is it but may change by Rd 1.

Shaw, McGovern, Grundy, Harwood, Brown, Hartley, Broad, Adams with Tip at F8.  Grundy I think will be the main beneficiary with Rhyce Shaws retirement and could step up. Has looked good in the NAB.

Lots of cash to splash elsewhere then

Bully

Daniel Rich is teasing me again, 26 touches, 16 contested, 80% efficiency.

IntegralX

Quote from: Bully on March 13, 2016, 04:53:31 PM
Daniel Rich is teasing me again, 26 touches, 16 contested, 80% efficiency.

Yep. Damn you Daniel Rich.

enzedder

Shaw, Rance, Lonergan, Weitering, MBrown, Hartley, McDonald-Tip, Ruggles with Adams fwd.

sammy123

laird,gibson,harwood,weitering,brown,hartley.

shaw has got me looking for ways to get him in

NickyBoy

 I've gone with Shaw, Macmillan, Seedsman, Harwood, Brown (ESS), Hartley (Lee, Ruggles)

AaronKirk

Am I completely mad thinking Sam Gilbert is some sort of half decent POD defense option?

sammy123

Quote from: AaronKirk on March 13, 2016, 07:25:31 PM
Am I completely mad thinking Sam Gilbert is some sort of half decent POD defense option?

could be a POD you never know

NickyBoy

Quote from: sammy123 on March 13, 2016, 07:34:19 PM
Quote from: AaronKirk on March 13, 2016, 07:25:31 PM
Am I completely mad thinking Sam Gilbert is some sort of half decent POD defense option?

could be a POD you never know
i mentioned it earlier but I think he is a really good POD option. I've got a gut feeling about this guy. Goes in for the hard ball, loves to tackle. Could get some very nice scores but, i don't have the guts to pick him yet