Player X v Player Y

Started by ben_020285, December 22, 2015, 02:28:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

LaHug

Quote from: jfitty on May 23, 2016, 11:11:54 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on May 23, 2016, 11:11:14 PM
Neale v Coniglio

Trying to decide between these two and Ward.. So I'll piggy back on here.

I just can't split the 3 of them

Look at byes and price... and then realise Coniglio is still super unique and won't cop a tag. So go Conigs.

dmac07


mzunguman

Quote from: LaHug on May 23, 2016, 11:14:51 PM
Quote from: jfitty on May 23, 2016, 11:11:54 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on May 23, 2016, 11:11:14 PM
Neale v Coniglio

Trying to decide between these two and Ward.. So I'll piggy back on here.

I just can't split the 3 of them

Look at byes and price... and then realise Coniglio is still super unique and won't cop a tag. So go Conigs.
Think I'm leaning towards Coniglio anyway... With Mundy being out Neale could cop more attention!

Quote from: dmac07 on May 23, 2016, 11:34:55 PM
Rance vs Boyd?

Rance still has cash to lose... Boyd right now, Rance in a week or two

dale93

Quote from: mzunguman on May 23, 2016, 11:45:47 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 23, 2016, 11:14:51 PM
Quote from: jfitty on May 23, 2016, 11:11:54 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on May 23, 2016, 11:11:14 PM
Neale v Coniglio

Trying to decide between these two and Ward.. So I'll piggy back on here.

I just can't split the 3 of them

Look at byes and price... and then realise Coniglio is still super unique and won't cop a tag. So go Conigs.
Think I'm leaning towards Coniglio anyway... With Mundy being out Neale could cop more attention!

Quote from: dmac07 on May 23, 2016, 11:34:55 PM
Rance vs Boyd?

Rance still has cash to lose... Boyd right now, Rance in a week or two

Is Mundy a certain to miss?

muggle25

Hopper or Williams.

Williams likely to retain his spot even with 4 dogs defenders coming back.  Looks fairly secure.

mzunguman

Quote from: muggle25 on May 24, 2016, 07:23:17 PM
Hopper or Williams.

Williams likely to retain his spot even with 4 dogs defenders coming back.  Looks fairly secure.

I like Williams.... I reckon Hopper is too expensive for someone who I think will average around 70odd... Versus Matheison whose 80k less averaging 60odd

Sabretooth Tigers

 :-\

Never ever thought I'd be asking this one, BUT

J McVeigh   V   J Howe

Please guys and gals try not to choke laughing but I'm really leaning toward Howe.  Howe is averaging 115% on his last 3 and will jump close to 500k after this week whilst McVeigh is still on a slide. All going well with selection guillotine night this week I need 1 of these 2        ;)

Bully

Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on May 25, 2016, 12:06:33 AM
:-\

Never ever thought I'd be asking this one, BUT

J McVeigh   V   J Howe

Please guys and gals try not to choke laughing but I'm really leaning toward Howe.  Howe is averaging 115% on his last 3 and will jump close to 500k after this week whilst McVeigh is still on a slide. All going well with selection guillotine night this week I need 1 of these 2        ;)

McVeigh still has some way to drop, hold fire until he does something. As for Howe, don't get sucked in, has never been SC relevant.

Sabretooth Tigers

Quote from: Bully on May 25, 2016, 12:16:45 AM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on May 25, 2016, 12:06:33 AM
:-\

Never ever thought I'd be asking this one, BUT

J McVeigh   V   J Howe

Please guys and gals try not to choke laughing but I'm really leaning toward Howe.  Howe is averaging 115% on his last 3 and will jump close to 500k after this week whilst McVeigh is still on a slide. All going well with selection guillotine night this week I need 1 of these 2        ;)

Thanks mate, didn't really want to risk trading Williams in, needed to in order to trade this week. Was going to wait for Mathieson to Josh Smith but Smith could make more $ yet. Interested to see how close Melbourne are to naming Trengove. Cheers mate.     ;)

McVeigh still has some way to drop, hold fire until he does something. As for Howe, don't get sucked in, has never been SC relevant.

MC

Quote from: LaHug on May 23, 2016, 11:14:51 PM
Quote from: jfitty on May 23, 2016, 11:11:54 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on May 23, 2016, 11:11:14 PM
Neale v Coniglio

Trying to decide between these two and Ward.. So I'll piggy back on here.

I just can't split the 3 of them

Look at byes and price... and then realise Coniglio is still super unique and won't cop a tag. So go Conigs.

Ward is cheaper, averaging more and has better history than the other two... Am I missing something here? Ward is also only in 10% of teams, meaning he is a relative POD as well. The way I look at it usually is to decide what I expected from each player before the season, and allow slight adjustments up or down. Can Coniglio maintain a 110+ average whilst playing a tagging/negating role every other week? I doubt it.

For me it's:

Ward >Neale > daylight > Coniglio                         

ants

dbj to williams, menadue to matho or bennedy to hopper? need the cash to go stef to goldie!

Sydney14


tommy10

Quote from: Sydney14 on May 26, 2016, 08:31:46 PM
Gray v Priddis  :-\
Tough one...toss of a coin long term, but Priddis this week, Gray the next.

Bennedy and Rance vs Priddis and Brown.

tommy10

Quote from: tommy10 on May 26, 2016, 10:44:02 PM
Quote from: Sydney14 on May 26, 2016, 08:31:46 PM
Gray v Priddis  :-\
Tough one...toss of a coin long term, but Priddis this week, Gray the next.

Bennedy and Rance vs Priddis and Brown.
Forgot to mention for the Priddis and Brown combo I'll have 92k vs 32k. Thinking next week's trades with Matheison to downgrade but may not have enough for Rance.

reenergised

Docherty V Rance  v Priddis

If i trade this week it has to be Doc before he gets out of reach
DBJ > Doc
Davis > Matherson a week early

Or wait next week and go
DJB(will loses some cash) > Rance (will lose cash)
Macpherson > Matherson



17 trades 177k in kitty