Player X v Player Y

lucky · March 10, 2016, 12:10:16 AM

Im sure this may have been done before but I'm not able to locate it but: Could you order the following expensive rookies.

Oliver v Parish v Mills v Mcaffer

GoLions · March 10, 2016, 12:11:54 AM

Quote from: lucky on March 10, 2016, 12:10:16 AM
Im sure this may have been done before but I'm not able to locate it but: Could you order the following expensive rookies.

Oliver v Parish v Mills v Mcaffer

Mills/Oliver, Parish, Macaffer

tommy10 · March 10, 2016, 12:23:54 AM

Weitering, Crouch, Mills, Parish vs Broad, Parker, Polkinghorne, Matheison

dosstheboss · March 10, 2016, 01:22:32 AM

Aish V Harwood at D4

GoLions · March 10, 2016, 01:38:40 AM

Quote from: tommy10 on March 10, 2016, 12:23:54 AM
Weitering, Crouch, Mills, Parish vs Broad, Parker, Polkinghorne, Matheison

If Crouch seems like he's ok for round 1, then the first option

GoLions · March 10, 2016, 01:39:28 AM

Quote from: dosstheboss on March 10, 2016, 01:22:32 AM
Aish V Harwood at D4

Harwood, as I'm a lot more confident in him being best 22 than Aish

mattttwillll · March 10, 2016, 02:34:13 AM

Better to go 4 premo forwards (Martin. Westhoff. Barlow. Greene) also including wells. And a 3 premo defence.

Or visa versa with a 4 premo backline in shaw. Laird. Bartel. And someone around 400-500k

steven3 · March 10, 2016, 03:03:13 PM

Quote from: mattttwillll on March 10, 2016, 02:34:13 AM
Better to go 4 premo forwards (Martin. Westhoff. Barlow. Greene) also including wells. And a 3 premo defence.

Or visa versa with a 4 premo backline in shaw. Laird. Bartel. And someone around 400-500k

Depends on rookies round 1, if there is enough rookies playing in each position i would go 4 premo forwards

steven3 · March 10, 2016, 03:04:20 PM

Fyfe vs Danger and Priddis vs Hannebery

GCSkiwi · March 10, 2016, 03:22:03 PM

Quote from: steven3 on March 10, 2016, 03:04:20 PM
Fyfe vs Danger and Priddis vs Hannebery

Definitely Hanners for me on the second pairing, and probably Danger though less clear cut. For the record I have Fyfe and Danger, and strongly considered Hanners.

hawkboy80 · March 10, 2016, 04:06:02 PM

GROUP A ... - Kommer, - S.Martin, - Ward, - Mc Tippa approx 65+100+105+60 = 330
vs this
GROUP B ... - DeGoey, - Goldy, - Polk, - Aish approx 80+115+60+75 = 330

I had group B but have made the change to group A which gives me 1 extra keeper, points are only my estimate and $ diff is only 15k, what do ppl think,
My midfield is heavily stacked so it wouldn't hurt my side to go back to my original group B & have 1 more rookie

Big Mac · March 10, 2016, 04:29:45 PM

Quote from: steven3 on March 10, 2016, 03:04:20 PM
Fyfe vs Danger and Priddis vs Hannebery

Fyfe + Hanners

almonds · March 10, 2016, 05:58:36 PM

Greene v Zorks v Zerret v Robinson

tommy10 · March 10, 2016, 07:24:18 PM

Quote from: almonds on March 10, 2016, 05:58:36 PM
Greene v Zorks v Zerret v Robinson

Robbo > Zorko > Zerrett > Greene

Goldy and Crouch vs Z Smith and Ablett
Thinking option 1...

supercoachhelp · March 10, 2016, 07:46:32 PM

Quote from: tommy10 on March 10, 2016, 07:24:18 PM
Quote from: almonds on March 10, 2016, 05:58:36 PM
Greene v Zorks v Zerret v Robinson
Robbo > Zorko > Zerrett > Greene

Goldy and Crouch vs Z Smith and Ablett
Thinking option 1...

Well goldy could go 120 again and crouch i'm assuming its brad may go 90 vs Smith who has shown potential in the nab to go anywhere between 85-95 and ablett to go 125 probs
So 210 vs 210 lol take a pick. This ones up what you think Smith and crouch can get.