Player X v Player Y

[supercoachhelp]

Bennell or Barlow

[fanTCfool]

Bennell or Barlow

Barlow, surely

[enzedder]

Bennell or Barlow

Barlow, surely

Barlow , definitely. Save yourself 43k while you're at it. Bonus!

[auscoyote]

As far as i know Bennel still hasn't been training with the main group.

Barlow easy!

[supercoachhelp]

okay thanks for that guys... what about o'meara or B.crouch

[Big Mac]

okay thanks for that guys... what about o'meara or B.crouch

Crouch

Also JOM is probably unlikely for round 1 at this stage

[enzedder]

okay thanks for that guys... what about o'meara or B.crouch

Crouch ....but possibly both...JOM is a wait and see.

[crowls]

Kade (Blues) Vs Kade (Suns)

KK has more upside. You know what you will get with Simmo but KK could be anywhere from 90 - 100 so i'd back him in.

imo KK could be anywhere from 80-100

Makes Simmo a little more attractive

got to agree.  simoo more reliable,  kk has both upside and downside risk


yeo v duryea v kk  v docherty.   goal is as potential keeper d3/4
currently have simmo, bartel, b smith

[Keeper27]

Hopper vs. Simpkin vs. Andersen.

[Football Factory]

Hopper vs. Simpkin vs. Andersen.

Hard to say at the moment, would be leaning towards Simpkin and Anderson because of age and experience, Anderson has shown the most so far.

Just saw this on the AFL site

Draftees Jacob Hopper and Matthew Kennedy showed they'll be pushing for a senior spot in round one with strong showings through the middle of the ground

[timtim]

Stringer & Malceski

OR

Buddy & Aish

[_wato]

I know that it seems ridiculous after everything I've stated this preseason, but is it nuts to not start with Goldy?

Thinking of saving $120k and going with Mummy. Gives me 14 keepers.

And Mummy has averaged 113 in the past, with an easy run to start. He has the record of monster scores. He could increase in price, very quickly. Goldy could drop after Nat and Stef. Possibly a trade that requires minimal cash. Is that nuts??

So, Goldy v Mummy + $120k

[Hawker_08]

I know that it seems ridiculous after everything I've stated this preseason, but is it nuts to not start with Goldy?

Thinking of saving $120k and going with Mummy. Gives me 14 keepers.

And Mummy has averaged 113 in the past, with an easy run to start. He has the record of monster scores. He could increase in price, very quickly. Goldy could drop after Nat and Stef. Possibly a trade that requires minimal cash. Is that nuts??

So, Goldy v Mummy + $120k

Chances are you won't have that "minimal cash" just sitting around as you will use it all up with your starting team so you will propably have to use 2 trades. Just stick with him. The mans a god!

[_wato]

Got just under $50k in the bank, with room for more.

[jeesh]

Houli or Rance