Player X v Player Y

Started by ben_020285, December 22, 2015, 02:28:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

dosstheboss

Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 07, 2016, 05:21:20 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on February 07, 2016, 03:02:37 PM


One of my own.

EMAC (D4) + Fyfe (M1) + 200-250k mid (M7) + Dahl (F2)

Vs

117 k rook (D5-8) + JPK (M3) + Wines (M6) + Devon Smith (D3)

and Smith vs Zerrett

First option & Smith

2 of Zorko/Wingard/Barlow ? F2&F3

Bluesman

Danger & Stef Martin VS Wines & Goldy??
Cheers

Money Shot

Quote from: Bluesman on February 07, 2016, 08:33:29 PM
Danger & Stef Martin VS Wines & Goldy??
Cheers
Danger and Martin ...

Money Shot

KK and Parish
Danger and 117k rookie defender

(if I go with the danger option I would only have 3 premium defenders and 5 117k rookies)

dosstheboss

Pick 2: Zorko V Wingard V Barlow

TomK

Quote from: Money Shot on February 07, 2016, 09:18:30 PM
KK and Parish
Danger and 117k rookie defender

(if I go with the danger option I would only have 3 premium defenders and 5 117k rookies)
KK and Parish, only on the basis that even though we haven't seen any rookies yet in NAB, I doubt we'd get 5 117k rookies down back

Quote from: dosstheboss on February 07, 2016, 09:39:03 PM
Pick 2: Zorko V Wingard V Barlow
Wingard and Barlow

fanTCfool

Shaw + 123k Rookie vs Duryea + Wells

AaronKirk

Quote from: fanTCfool on February 07, 2016, 11:08:02 PM
Shaw + 123k Rookie vs Duryea + Wells

Shaw + rookie.

Shaw will still be a top 6 defender IMO even though he should drop in price.

A bit too much risk with Duryea. Wells should be strongly considered however (I have changed my mind on Wells)

Quote from: Money Shot on February 07, 2016, 09:18:30 PM
KK and Parish
Danger and 117k rookie defender

(if I go with the danger option I would only have 3 premium defenders and 5 117k rookies)

Danger and 117k rookie defender

Danger is a gun and I still am contemplating how to fit him in my side. Im guessing you have the Essendon M.Brown (who is 117k) but there are a couple of other options IMO are a good round 1 chance.

1 is Hartley from Essendon who is a mature aged KPP who will play as we don't have many of them available with the drug bans and the other is Bonner from Port Adelaide who they are absolutely raving about. Need to watch NAB though.

With a fully fit Malceski and returning players in the suns midfield I am unsure about KK at this stage. Need to watch him in the NAB. Parish will have a tough initiation with all the bans. Will play every week as I think he is a gun but is a lean body type who will get bullied around in the contests.

R.Gray v Danger v Priddis

Money Shot


RaisyDaisy

Quote from: AaronKirk on February 08, 2016, 03:32:00 AM
R.Gray v Danger v Priddis

I had Gray in my side for the past few weeks but changed him to danger last week

Cant go wrong with either. Gray if you need the cash elsewhere or danger if you can afford

MC

Danger will average more for the year, but may possibly start a touch slower than Gray. I think Gray is good for 110-ish, Danger 115-ish.

Priddis is such a classic case, he's the Daniel Cross of the 110-average players - always so consistent! He even snuck through to win a Brownlow and still, no one picks him haha

NickyBoy


Bully

Quote from: NickyBoy on February 08, 2016, 09:36:53 PM
Tippet Vs Buddy

Buddy all the way, Tippett will frustrate you when he pulls in his regular shockers. Granted Buddy can do the same but not as often. If Tippett rucks there may be a solid case but with Sinclair being the number 1 man I'm not so sure.

ben_020285


Jackross10

wines (m5) and wells (f4) vs dahl (f4) and parish (m6)