Player X v Player Y

[AaronKirk]

Nic Nat, Wines and Franklin

vs

Lobbe, Gray, Dahlhaus

Can you do Nic Nat, Gray and Dahlhaus?

Otherwise option 1 but not by much.

I see Nic Nat around 105, Wines 105, Buddy 95

v

Lobbe 90, Gray 110 and Dahl 100

[Hawker_08]

Nic Nat, Wines and Franklin

vs

Lobbe, Gray, Dahlhaus

Can you do Nic Nat, Gray and Dahlhaus?

Otherwise option 1 but not by much.

I see Nic Nat around 105, Wines 105, Buddy 95

v

Lobbe 90, Gray 110 and Dahl 100

The funds from downgrading Nic Nat to Lobbe are being used to upgrade those guys. If I downgraded my rookies a bit to the basement priced essendon ones then would you go Wines to Gray/Sloane or Buddy to Zorko/Bennel/Dahlhaus? Thanks for the reply, would love your thoughts on my team as well. Cheers.

[BomberSam]

Parker vs. Shiel vs. Wines?

[TomK]

Parker vs. Shiel vs. Wines?

Parker > Wines > Shiel

[Gigantor]

Parker vs. Shiel vs. Wines?

Wow thats tough

Parker for me, less risk

Shiel if you want a real POD

[Gigantor]

Pendles, Goldy, Shaw + Def Rookie

vs

4 lesser premos (Eg, Sloane, SMartin, KK, Hurn)

[BomberSam]

Thanks guys, but is Parker actually less risk? Is he going to play a pure mid role? The rise of T-Mitch has me wondering.

[BomberSam]

Pendles, Goldy, Shaw + Def Rookie

vs

4 lesser premos (Eg, Sloane, SMartin, KK, Hurn)

Pendles is underpriced, likely to be back to his 120+ best.
I am of the opinion Goldy will be hard to achieve if you don't start with him, lock him in if you can.
I feel there is much better value than Shaw, and he will be available significantly cheaper at some point.

So Pendles, Goldy and perhaps a couple of value defenders? Could you afford Smith and Yeo?

[Gigantor]

Thanks guys, but is Parker actually less risk? Is he going to play a pure mid role? The rise of T-Mitch has me wondering.

I think Shiel could go massive but will probably be the first GWS player to attract a tag

Yes Parker could spend more time forward but he his good enough to kick 25+ if he does.

Wines is a very close second to Parker but I'm wary of Port players as I think they are a bit of an unknown this year

[Gigantor]

Pendles, Goldy, Shaw + Def Rookie

vs

4 lesser premos (Eg, Sloane, SMartin, KK, Hurn)

Pendles is underpriced, likely to be back to his 120+ best.
I am of the opinion Goldy will be hard to achieve if you don't start with him, lock him in if you can.
I feel there is much better value than Shaw, and he will be available significantly cheaper at some point.

So Pendles, Goldy and perhaps a couple of value defenders? Could you afford Smith and Yeo?

Yeo and Smith are currently D2 and D3 haha

If a lot of quality cheap rookies appear rd 1 I will be able to go Pendles, Goldy + 2 cheaper def premos but for now I think I'll stick with Pendles, Goldy, Shaw and Rookie.

[fasttrack13]

Shaw + Sloane + Zerrett + 190-200k M(7) rookie
V
McVeigh + Pendlebury + Bennell + 123k M(7) rookie


The research I've done is that option 1 is safer as they're worst will be better than option 2 but option 2 has a higher ceiling.
Thinking Pendles + Bennell could go same as Sloane + Zerrett so then it's Shaw v McVeigh where shaw is an easy win.

But I'm not too sure...?

[Dons]

Shaw + Sloane + Zerrett + 190-200k M(7) rookie
V
McVeigh + Pendlebury + Bennell + 123k M(7) rookie


The research I've done is that option 1 is safer as they're worst will be better than option 2 but option 2 has a higher ceiling.
Thinking Pendles + Bennell could go same as Sloane + Zerrett so then it's Shaw v McVeigh where shaw is an easy win.

But I'm not too sure...?

I think pendles and bennell would outscore sloane and zerrett comfortably myself mate.

[Ricochet]

Shaw + Sloane + Zerrett + 190-200k M(7) rookie
V
McVeigh + Pendlebury + Bennell + 123k M(7) rookie


The research I've done is that option 1 is safer as they're worst will be better than option 2 but option 2 has a higher ceiling.
Thinking Pendles + Bennell could go same as Sloane + Zerrett so then it's Shaw v McVeigh where shaw is an easy win.

But I'm not too sure...?

I would go Pendles + Bennell over Sloane + Zerrett every day of the week man. And Shaw vs McVeigh there isn't much in it imo (i reckon Shaw comes back down to 105ish next year, maybe even lower)

So bottom one for me

[BomberSam]

Shaw + Sloane + Zerrett + 190-200k M(7) rookie
V
McVeigh + Pendlebury + Bennell + 123k M(7) rookie


The research I've done is that option 1 is safer as they're worst will be better than option 2 but option 2 has a higher ceiling.
Thinking Pendles + Bennell could go same as Sloane + Zerrett so then it's Shaw v McVeigh where shaw is an easy win.

But I'm not too sure...?

Definitely McVeigh, Pendles and Bennell. Watch Bennell pre-season though. He could average 110-115 if he could stay on the park, but that sciatica could be a problem. You will get Shaw cheaper, perfect upgrade target.

[quinny88]

Simpson V KK ?