Player X v Player Y

Started by ben_020285, December 22, 2015, 02:28:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

GraysFan

Quote from: Spite on January 07, 2016, 10:52:04 PM
Dylan Shiel vs Bennell (obviously can easily restructure team)

Bennell. Has more of a chance of being a top 8 forward than what Shiel has being a top 10 midfielder

ronl

Had both these players last year.  Even though each could go really big, they could also go just as low.  I'm sure both will be more consistent this year but of the two I'd say Bennell, if he's been able to fix his attitude problem, has more upside than Shiel. Getting away from the Gold Coast will be a plus for him.  He'll be in my team as I think he is an incredibly gifted player and, really, an untapped goldmine.

Ringo

Sam Kerridge v Jarryd Lyons.

Tossing up whether to take both. 
Lyons was Crows main vest candidate last year(9/13 played) but unsubbed averaged 78 (which includes a 46),  Will he be the one to step up with Danger leaving?
Kerridge is some $100k cheaper but will he get opportunities with all the Blues ins.
Lyons I think has the greater upside for cash generation which is what we are seeking early. Priced at a 45 average to start.

Dons

Quote from: Ringo on January 08, 2016, 02:21:16 PM
Sam Kerridge v Jarryd Lyons.

Tossing up whether to take both. 
Lyons was Crows main vest candidate last year(9/13 played) but unsubbed averaged 78 (which includes a 46),  Will he be the one to step up with Danger leaving?
Kerridge is some $100k cheaper but will he get opportunities with all the Blues ins.
Lyons I think has the greater upside for cash generation which is what we are seeking early. Priced at a 45 average to start.
Both, if selected. Lyons is going to be my POD, don't think many will start him and he has shown a solid ceiling.

LordSneeze

Quote from: Dons on January 08, 2016, 02:26:43 PM
Quote from: Ringo on January 08, 2016, 02:21:16 PM
Sam Kerridge v Jarryd Lyons.

Tossing up whether to take both. 
Lyons was Crows main vest candidate last year(9/13 played) but unsubbed averaged 78 (which includes a 46),  Will he be the one to step up with Danger leaving?
Kerridge is some $100k cheaper but will he get opportunities with all the Blues ins.
Lyons I think has the greater upside for cash generation which is what we are seeking early. Priced at a 45 average to start.
Both, if selected. Lyons is going to be my POD, don't think many will start him and he has shown a solid ceiling.
Lyons is like Jed Anderson, on the fringe of playing and not playing. Will likely need a injury or two to get a consistent run in the team. I think there is better value around that price range, but if you are looking for a POD then not a bad shout.

Dons

Quote from: LordSneeze on January 08, 2016, 03:15:17 PM
Quote from: Dons on January 08, 2016, 02:26:43 PM
Quote from: Ringo on January 08, 2016, 02:21:16 PM
Sam Kerridge v Jarryd Lyons.

Tossing up whether to take both. 
Lyons was Crows main vest candidate last year(9/13 played) but unsubbed averaged 78 (which includes a 46),  Will he be the one to step up with Danger leaving?
Kerridge is some $100k cheaper but will he get opportunities with all the Blues ins.
Lyons I think has the greater upside for cash generation which is what we are seeking early. Priced at a 45 average to start.
Both, if selected. Lyons is going to be my POD, don't think many will start him and he has shown a solid ceiling.
Lyons is like Jed Anderson, on the fringe of playing and not playing. Will likely need a injury or two to get a consistent run in the team. I think there is better value around that price range, but if you are looking for a POD then not a bad shout.
Yeah, he would have to get selected first, but at this early stage I think he might. I would purely be selecting him as a very high priced rookie who has shown he can score above 100. After all, it's all about getting a solid ave over 5-6 rounds, with 1 100+ score in his last 3, and he could be a very early stepping stone to a Goldy/Fyfe type, for example. Problem will be having another ripe early too, maybe a Wells/Kennedy/Myers type.

Sabretooth Tigers

Quote from: Ringo on January 08, 2016, 02:21:16 PM
Sam Kerridge v Jarryd Lyons.

Tossing up whether to take both. 
Lyons was Crows main vest candidate last year(9/13 played) but unsubbed averaged 78 (which includes a 46),  Will he be the one to step up with Danger leaving?
Kerridge is some $100k cheaper but will he get opportunities with all the Blues ins.
Lyons I think has the greater upside for cash generation which is what we are seeking early. Priced at a 45 average to start.

I was curious about these two as well. But without The NAB knowledge have taken both at this stage    :)

_wato

Which player at M3?

Gray $596k
Sloane $563k
Jelwood $566k
Parker $538k

Ablett, Rockliff, ____, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham

Spite

Quote from: _wato on January 09, 2016, 12:48:36 AM
Which player at M3?

Gray $596k
Sloane $563k
Jelwood $566k
Parker $538k

Ablett, Rockliff, ____, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham

If you select Parker then it's the same mid as me atm

Probably Selwood though tbh

_wato

Really? I'm thinking Gray and I want somebody to say why not to hahahah

ben_020285

Quote from: _wato on January 09, 2016, 12:48:36 AM
Which player at M3?

Gray $596k
Sloane $563k
Jelwood $566k
Parker $538k

Ablett, Rockliff, ____, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham

Watson? Really? No justification would get me even considering him again. Well and truly past it.

Gray seems the safest pick out of the four you mentioned.


Grufflez

Quote from: Ringo on January 08, 2016, 02:21:16 PM
Sam Kerridge v Jarryd Lyons.

Tossing up whether to take both. 
Lyons was Crows main vest candidate last year(9/13 played) but unsubbed averaged 78 (which includes a 46),  Will he be the one to step up with Danger leaving?
Kerridge is some $100k cheaper but will he get opportunities with all the Blues ins.
Lyons I think has the greater upside for cash generation which is what we are seeking early. Priced at a 45 average to start.

Lyons is a proven ball winner at SANFL level and kicks goals, none of that has transitioned over to AFL yet because he hasn't been given the chance (always sub) it could go either way, the sub rule being abolished could help him or see him on the fringe, i lean towards he will get a chance.
He has recruited a sports scientist to work closely with mainly on his running efficiency & endurance.

Grufflez

Quote from: _wato on January 09, 2016, 12:48:36 AM
Which player at M3?

Gray $596k
Sloane $563k
Jelwood $566k
Parker $538k

Ablett, Rockliff, ____, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham

Gray.

Sabretooth Tigers

Quote from: _wato on January 09, 2016, 12:48:36 AM
Which player at M3?

Gray $596k
Sloane $563k
Jelwood $566k
Parker $538k

Ablett, Rockliff, ____, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham

Gray, but I have both he and Parker ATM.

tbagrocks

Quote from: ben_020285 on January 09, 2016, 01:43:53 AM
Quote from: _wato on January 09, 2016, 12:48:36 AM
Which player at M3?

Gray $596k
Sloane $563k
Jelwood $566k
Parker $538k

Ablett, Rockliff, ____, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham
It's a crazy M3 imo not to have others but, Sloane of them. Selwood maybe but he's a caution, but he's the best option. Sloane set to have his best year given age and the inbred Dangerless
Watson? Really? No justification would get me even considering him again. Well and truly past it.

Gray seems the safest pick out of the four you mentioned.