Player X v Player Y

[Gigantor]

Shaw + Lids + Def Rookie

Vs

Bartel + Buddy + Malceski

[fanTCfool]

Shaw + Lids + Def Rookie

Vs

Bartel + Buddy + Malceski

Slightly prefer Option A

[fanTCfool]

J.Polec vs D.Thomas vs J.O'Meara

Definitely JOM if fit for Round One, maybe take a punt on Daisy if not.

[MC]

Shaw + Lids + Def Rookie

Vs

Bartel + Buddy + Malceski

If you subbed Bartel for someone else i'd prefer B.

[_wato]

Shaw + Lids + Def Rookie

Vs

Bartel + Buddy + Malceski

105 + 105 + 60 + 2 keepers + cash injection

Vs

90 + 105 + 80 + 2 keepers + top 30 defender

Option A for me

[_wato]

Mcveigh, Swallow, Hopper v Jobe, Birchall, Rookie + $40k v Parker, Birchall, Rookie

Hard to make a call considering rookies are just a guess to anyone at this stage but we all know Hopper will play and the $123k rookies are always a little bit worse in terms of JS and scoring.. So really your input gives me security financially, in case the extra money spent on Hopper is better spent.

[fanTCfool]

Wellingham vs Hibberd

[GraysFan]

Wellingham vs Hibberd

Hibberd

[Peter]

Hibberd by a mile

[LordSneeze]

Mcveigh, Swallow, Hopper v Jobe, Birchall, Rookie + $40k v Parker, Birchall, Rookie

Hard to make a call considering rookies are just a guess to anyone at this stage but we all know Hopper will play and the $123k rookies are always a little bit worse in terms of JS and scoring.. So really your input gives me security financially, in case the extra money spent on Hopper is better spent.

TBH I don't like any of the options.
Option 1 - McVeigh is solid if he is fit, Swallow is underpriced, but I cannot see him being a Mid Keeper and is too pricy to start if he isn't going to be a keeper. Hopper I need to see more of in preseason.
Option 2 - Jobe is underpriced, Birchall is consistent but I would prefer others at his price, the rookie will depend on if one is available.
Option 3 - Parker again is underpriced, No need to say again for birchall, Rookie depends on position

I do find 3 player options hard to pick as you cannot see the structure of teams, i find it better to see the full team and make notes on it that way for anything over 2 player comparisons.

[_wato]

1. Mcveigh, Bartel, Smith, Hibberd, Mackenzie, Brown (Bonner, Brown)
Ablett, Rockliff, Sloane, Swallow, Liberatore, Crouch, Mills, Hopper (Freeman, Mathieson, Petracca)
Goldstein, Naitanui (King)
Martin, Barlow, Franklin, Leuenberger, Wells, Kennedy (Kerridge, Kommer)

2. Birchall, Bartel, Smith, Hibberd, Mackenzie, Brown (Bonner, Brown)
Ablett, Rockliff, Sloane, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham (Freeman, Mathieson, Petracca)
Goldstein, Naitanui (King)
Martin, Barlow, Franklin, Leuenberger, Wells, Kennedy (Kerridge, Kommer)

3. Birchall, Bartel, Smith, Hibberd, Mackenzie, Brown (Bonner, Brown)
Ablett, Rockliff, Sloane, Parker, Liberatore, Crouch, Mills, Cuningham (Freeman, Mathieson, Petracca)
Goldstein, Naitanui (King)
Martin, Barlow, Franklin, Leuenberger, Wells, Kennedy (Kerridge, Kommer)

[LordSneeze]

1. Mcveigh, Bartel, Smith, Hibberd, Mackenzie, Brown (Bonner, Brown)
Ablett, Rockliff, Sloane, Swallow, Liberatore, Crouch, Mills, Hopper (Freeman, Mathieson, Petracca)
Goldstein, Naitanui (King)
Martin, Barlow, Franklin, Leuenberger, Wells, Kennedy (Kerridge, Kommer)

2. Birchall, Bartel, Smith, Hibberd, Mackenzie, Brown (Bonner, Brown)
Ablett, Rockliff, Sloane, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham (Freeman, Mathieson, Petracca)
Goldstein, Naitanui (King)
Martin, Barlow, Franklin, Leuenberger, Wells, Kennedy (Kerridge, Kommer)

3. Birchall, Bartel, Smith, Hibberd, Mackenzie, Brown (Bonner, Brown)
Ablett, Rockliff, Sloane, Parker, Liberatore, Crouch, Mills, Cuningham (Freeman, Mathieson, Petracca)
Goldstein, Naitanui (King)
Martin, Barlow, Franklin, Leuenberger, Wells, Kennedy (Kerridge, Kommer)

Option 2 for me, I much prefer the look of that midfiled.
Not sure of Birchall as D1 though.

[Money Shot]

McVeigh, Parker and someone like Trengrove would be more preference ...

[_wato]

Sloane v Gray v Parker + $60k

[Money Shot]

Sloane v Gray v Parker + $60k

I see Gray having the highest avg with an easy draw which should make it some what easier although I don't look into them that much.
Sloane could avg 100-130 so its how much of a risk you are willing to take on that one.
Parker I think is probably a bit off Gray but he wouldn't be a bad pick either.

Gray
Sloane
Parker

for me.