Player X v Player Y

[Money Shot]

Sidebottom vs Sloane  (Already have Rocky, don't want Jelwood)

Sloane for me. He has a lot more upside.

[Money Shot]

Laird V Simpson
Selwood V Sloane
Bennell V Zorko

[ben_020285]

Laird V Simpson
Selwood V Sloane
Bennell V Zorko

Simpson, Sloane, Bennell

[Dons]

Laird V Simpson
Selwood V Sloane
Bennell V Zorko

Laird, sloane, bennell

[MC]

Laird V Simpson
Selwood V Sloane
Bennell V Zorko

Simpson: proven 90+ and Laird might be effected by Jaensch/Smith
Selwood: Solid 115-118 player for years, will bounce back for sure now that he has help.
Zorko: Over Bennell because Bennell has moved team and is an uncertainty.

[Southstorm]

Laird V Simpson
Selwood V Sloane
Bennell V Zorko

Uhh, none of the first two. Sorry  :P Think there's better options than Laird for the money and Simpson will come down a lot in price if his scoring pattern keeps up.

Sloane over Selwood, Joel still isn't 100% fit and also usually has a drop in price.

Bennell has a higher ceiling, Zorko will be more consistent I think.

[crowls]

Laird V Simpson
Selwood V Sloane
Bennell V Zorko

Simpson - more reliable and lots of questions over Adelaides back setup
Sloane has more upside and Selwood a slow starter
Bennell possible to be top fwd for the year and odds on to avg 100+. 

[_wato]

Luke Parker v Dylan Shiel

None of the above

Sidebottom vs Sloane  (Already have Rocky, don't want Jelwood)

Sloane

Laird V Simpson
Selwood V Sloane
Bennell V Zorko

Simpson, Sloane, Bennell

[Sabretooth Tigers]

 :-[

Help please guys, I'm really bad at this.

Shiel  and  Leuenberger   v   Myers  and  Naitanui     Points wise, and financial gain  (just a rough idea)  as well please.   Thanks in advance     ;D :) ;)

[Sabretooth Tigers]

Laird V Simpson
Selwood V Sloane
Bennell V Zorko

Laird, sloane, bennell

All the way this way.    ;)

[crowls]

:-[

Help please guys, I'm really bad at this.

Shiel  and  Leuenberger   v   Myers  and  Naitanui     Points wise, and financial gain  (just a rough idea)  as well please.   Thanks in advance     ;D :) ;)

shiel 100-105 and luey 90+  = 190-195
Myers 80-85 and nicnat 100-110 = 180-195.
more variation in myers and nicnat so would make more sense to go with shiel and leuy.   also the dpp benefit.

[MC]

:-[

Help please guys, I'm really bad at this.

Shiel  and  Leuenberger   v   Myers  and  Naitanui     Points wise, and financial gain  (just a rough idea)  as well please.   Thanks in advance     ;D :) ;)

shiel 100-105 and luey 90+  = 190-195
Myers 80-85 and nicnat 100-110 = 180-195.
more variation in myers and nicnat so would make more sense to go with shiel and leuy.   also the dpp benefit.

If we run with those points for each you'd have to take option 2. At least NN at 105-110 is a keeper in the rucks. 90 is very generous for luey but still not forward keeper level, same goes with 100-105 for Shiel, not good enough for M8.

[Grufflez]

I still can't decide between T.Mitch vs Shiel !

[fanTCfool]

I still can't decide between T.Mitch vs Shiel !

I'd go with T.Mitch, although both can be a little inconsistent

[Money Shot]

Pendles v Sloane/Selwood

Is Pendles worth the extra money if he is going to play more of a forward role this season?