Player X v Player Y

[The_Captain]

Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?

A can of coke consistently delivers week in week out where we Travis Cloke is too up and down for me.

Yeah, can of coke doesnt get in the way either...

[ben_020285]

Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?

Can of Coke easily but would prefer can of Pepsi Max.

[Grufflez]

Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?

A can of coke consistently delivers week in week out where we Travis Cloke is too up and down for me.

Yeah, can of coke doesnt get in the way either...

The can will probably draw 2 thirsty defenders though, unless Big Trav has a beer in his back pocket i reckon the can has him beat.
Both won't kick goals so that's a non argument.

[The_Captain]

Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?

A can of coke consistently delivers week in week out where we Travis Cloke is too up and down for me.

Yeah, can of coke doesnt get in the way either...

The can will probably draw 2 thirsty defenders though, unless Big Trav has a beer in his back pocket i reckon the can has him beat.
Both won't kick goals so that's a non argument.

Your not wrong. Can plays for the team, as opposed to Trav who is plays for himself!

[Grufflez]

Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?

A can of coke consistently delivers week in week out where we Travis Cloke is too up and down for me.

Yeah, can of coke doesnt get in the way either...

The can will probably draw 2 thirsty defenders though, unless Big Trav has a beer in his back pocket i reckon the can has him beat.
Both won't kick goals so that's a non argument.

with
Your not wrong. Can plays for the team, as opposed to Trav who is plays for himself!

Too childish?  :P

[The_Captain]

Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?

A can of coke consistently delivers week in week out where we Travis Cloke is too up and down for me.

Yeah, can of coke doesnt get in the way either...

The can will probably draw 2 thirsty defenders though, unless Big Trav has a beer in his back pocket i reckon the can has him beat.
Both won't kick goals so that's a non argument.

with
Your not wrong. Can plays for the team, as opposed to Trav who is plays for himself!

Too childish?  :P

ahahha na, spot on!!!

[Football Factory]

Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?

A can of coke consistently delivers week in week out where we Travis Cloke is too up and down for me.

Yeah, can of coke doesnt get in the way either...

The can will probably draw 2 thirsty defenders though, unless Big Trav has a beer in his back pocket i reckon the can has him beat.
Both won't kick goals so that's a non argument.

with
Your not wrong. Can plays for the team, as opposed to Trav who is plays for himself!

Too childish?  :P

lmao

Can of Coke

[Sabretooth Tigers]

Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?

The can of coke works harder and longer and has no trouble going between the big sticks.      ;)

[Peter]

R Gray vs Rockliff?

[Money Shot]

R Gray vs Rockliff?

Rockliff. Cheaper and can score more. I do like Gray but compared the rocky he is a no.

[creeker]

Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?

A massive lol.
I do know that 1 past SC winner is seriously considering starting big Trav.
A gutsy move but sometimes these picks can pay off.
I think the can of coke wins this X v Y.

[ronl]

Leaving Goldie out of the equation for financial reasons,  nominate which of the following ruck combinations appeals most:

1. Mumford/Martin
2. Mumford/Jacobs
3. Mumford/Nicnat
4. Mumford/Luenberger
5. Mumford/anybody else

Three wise men currently hold a discussion on the SUPERCOACH site and unanimously agree that Shane Mumford is, far and away, the ruck-lock of the century for next year, provided of course that he can stay on the ground and not trip over a blade of grass or something.  Their certainty took me a bit by surprise considering that they really didn't offer much of a rationale except that he's a great ruckman and overdue to have an injury-free year, and when he's injury-free he consistently scores really big, all of which is true enough.  Anybody agree with them?

[Gigantor]

To risky in my opinion, if you really want to pick him you would have to have Leuy in the forward line for cover.

[Money Shot]

I really want to lock him in but he is way to injury prone for me. I don't have Leuy at this stage and there fore are not taking the risk.
Nic Nat and Martin for me.

Bartel V Simpson.

[Gigantor]

I really want to lock him in but he is way to injury prone for me. I don't have Leuy at this stage and there fore are not taking the risk.
Nic Nat and Martin for me.

Bartel V Simpson.

Simpson for me, he might average a few points less but I think he will play more games