Player X v Player Y

Started by ben_020285, December 22, 2015, 02:28:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

mark44

Quote from: Samm79 on April 15, 2016, 12:26:53 PM
Quote from: tor01doc on April 15, 2016, 11:56:06 AM
Good morning gentlemen and GoLions,

I am reaching out to those of you with a low opinion of your SC knowledge.

If you decide to post a query that you expect to be answered immediately below a query that someone expects to be answered, why not take the effort to share your opinion before derailing the thread?

We value your opinion and you.  :-*

second this ^

Fair enough

GoLions

Quote from: tor01doc on April 15, 2016, 11:56:06 AM
Good morning gentlemen and GoLions,

I am reaching out to those of you with a low opinion of your SC knowledge.

If you decide to post a query that you expect to be answered immediately below a query that someone expects to be answered, why not take the effort to share your opinion before derailing the thread?

We value your opinion and you.  :-*
OI :P

Ringo

This is a good point - if you can avoid posting your X v Y till after the previous one has had at least one reply it would be appreciated.

Scrolling through the thread as i can I have found some 4 requests still not answered due to another being requested and then getting lost.

Do not want to go down the path of deleting requests but if you can not observe the simple courtesy of waiting for at least one reply on the previous I may take that action.  There is also no reason why you can not comment and then post your own.

As mods we are also merging some new topics into this thread so hence the need for courtesy/

Samsturmfels

Im trading out Crouch

Parish v Wright v keep Crouch (field papley)

Ringo

 The three of these players are all predicted to peak at around the $400k mark.  So looking at the three
Parish has $140K to make based on maintaining and average of 83.
Wright is predicted to only make $49k  based on previous averages against teams
Crouch is only predicted to rise $76k based on previous averages against teams.

A couple of notes to consider Both Wright and Crouch obviously are improving on last year so these averages may improve resulting in higher cash gains and will Parish maintain an 83 average.

So my choice would be to stay with Crouch as he has the runs on the board.  Maybe with this break he can come back and average 102 as he did last year when he came back.

Samsturmfels

Quote from: Ringo on April 15, 2016, 02:54:45 PM
The three of these players are all predicted to peak at around the $400k mark.  So looking at the three
Parish has $140K to make based on maintaining and average of 83.
Wright is predicted to only make $49k  based on previous averages against teams
Crouch is only predicted to rise $76k based on previous averages against teams.

A couple of notes to consider Both Wright and Crouch obviously are improving on last year so these averages may improve resulting in higher cash gains and will Parish maintain an 83 average.

So my choice would be to stay with Crouch as he has the runs on the board.  Maybe with this break he can come back and average 102 as he did last year when he came back.

thanks mate, Im just not sure about having 4 players not making any money at this time of year (Hewett, Crouch, Grimley and Petrecca)

Ringo

Quote from: Samsturmfels on April 15, 2016, 02:58:52 PM
Quote from: Ringo on April 15, 2016, 02:54:45 PM
The three of these players are all predicted to peak at around the $400k mark.  So looking at the three
Parish has $140K to make based on maintaining and average of 83.
Wright is predicted to only make $49k  based on previous averages against teams
Crouch is only predicted to rise $76k based on previous averages against teams.

A couple of notes to consider Both Wright and Crouch obviously are improving on last year so these averages may improve resulting in higher cash gains and will Parish maintain an 83 average.

So my choice would be to stay with Crouch as he has the runs on the board.  Maybe with this break he can come back and average 102 as he did last year when he came back.

thanks mate, Im just not sure about having 4 players not making any money at this time of year (Hewett, Crouch, Grimley and Petrecca)
In that case go with gut as to what is best for your team - Yep 4 non earning may be a bit much at this time.  You do not have the option of trading hewett via DPP do you?

MC

Hey guys,

If you were to try to fix one of the following problems, which would you prioritise and why?

1. Greene
2. Barlow
3. Yeo
4. Lonergan
5. JPK/Pendles (minor in comparison, still annoying)

Lonergan as the bloke with the least runs on the board is what i'm leaning towards, unsure whether to pull the trigger this week or to wait though...
What do you reckon?

Bully

Quote from: MC on April 15, 2016, 03:03:18 PM
Hey guys,

If you were to try to fix one of the following problems, which would you prioritise and why?

1. Greene
2. Barlow
3. Yeo
4. Lonergan
5. JPK/Pendles (minor in comparison, still annoying)

Lonergan as the bloke with the least runs on the board is what i'm leaning towards, unsure whether to pull the trigger this week or to wait though...
What do you reckon?

Greene is a nightmare this year, I would be trading him for sure.

Ringo

In this order
Greene
Barlow
Lonergan
Yeo
JPK/Pendles

Greene is having a shocking year and doubt if he can it around Hope I am wrong though.

MontyJnr

Quote from: MC on April 15, 2016, 03:03:18 PM
Hey guys,

If you were to try to fix one of the following problems, which would you prioritise and why?

1. Greene
2. Barlow
3. Yeo
4. Lonergan
5. JPK/Pendles (minor in comparison, still annoying)

Lonergan as the bloke with the least runs on the board is what i'm leaning towards, unsure whether to pull the trigger this week or to wait though...
What do you reckon?

1. Greene
2. Lonergan
3. Yeo
4. Barlow
5. JPK
6. Pendles

Jay

Quote from: MC on April 15, 2016, 03:03:18 PM
Hey guys,

If you were to try to fix one of the following problems, which would you prioritise and why?

1. Greene
2. Barlow
3. Yeo
4. Lonergan
5. JPK/Pendles (minor in comparison, still annoying)

Lonergan as the bloke with the least runs on the board is what i'm leaning towards, unsure whether to pull the trigger this week or to wait though...
What do you reckon?
In this order of what I'd fix first:

1. Greene
2. Lonergan
3. Barlow
4. Yeo

JPK/Pendles isn't a problem at all mate. Hold them the whole year, they'll come good - proven guns.

Jay

JPK vs Sidebottom vs Sloane vs Treloar

Money Shot

Quote from: Jay on April 15, 2016, 05:36:31 PM
JPK vs Sidebottom vs Sloane vs Treloar
I personally like Treloar out of those options but I don't think you can go wrong with any really.

R.Gray v Smitchell
and
Kennedy v Oliver v Parish

thanks guys.


Asparagus

Quote from: Money Shot on April 15, 2016, 05:57:27 PM
Quote from: Jay on April 15, 2016, 05:36:31 PM
JPK vs Sidebottom vs Sloane vs Treloar
I personally like Treloar out of those options but I don't think you can go wrong with any really.

R.Gray v Smitchell (snitch may get a rest)
and
Kennedy (senior body+player who won't get tired at seasons end v Oliver v Parish

thanks guys.

My 2 cents MS