Player X v Player Y

[mzunguman]

Wingard (F3) or Parker (M6)

Parker.

Player v player I agree. Parker will score more. And at his price he is a bargain.

However Parker at M6 is strong and only leaves 2 spots for mid pricers or rookies. It also means his forward line is potentially weak from F3-6. I think there are better options for M6-8 who will score well (ie Libba, crouch, mills, Oliver) as opposed to fwd options available.

Thanks Guys, yeah I think I'm leaning towards Wingard otherwise my forward line will be something like Martin, Barlow, Wells, Bennedy, Menadue, Kerridge
Which is probably 1 too many rookies to have on? Unless these guys will keep getting games?

[Blues Blues Blues]

Wingard (F3) or Parker (M6)

Parker.

Player v player I agree. Parker will score more. And at his price he is a bargain.

However Parker at M6 is strong and only leaves 2 spots for mid pricers or rookies. It also means his forward line is potentially weak from F3-6. I think there are better options for M6-8 who will score well (ie Libba, crouch, mills, Oliver) as opposed to fwd options available.

Thanks Guys, yeah I think I'm leaning towards Wingard otherwise my forward line will be something like Martin, Barlow, Wells, Bennedy, Menadue, Kerridge
Which is probably 1 too many rookies to have on? Unless these guys will keep getting games?

Similar to mine, although I have Hall instead of Dusty so technically weaker than yours. Strong R1 for the like of Wells, Bennedy, Kerridge and Menadue, but I'm nervous about relying on them every week. Waiting for them to ripen.

I should say that if Parker scores well again this week I will be looking to find a way to get him in!

[mzunguman]

Wingard (F3) or Parker (M6)

Parker.

Player v player I agree. Parker will score more. And at his price he is a bargain.

However Parker at M6 is strong and only leaves 2 spots for mid pricers or rookies. It also means his forward line is potentially weak from F3-6. I think there are better options for M6-8 who will score well (ie Libba, crouch, mills, Oliver) as opposed to fwd options available.

Thanks Guys, yeah I think I'm leaning towards Wingard otherwise my forward line will be something like Martin, Barlow, Wells, Bennedy, Menadue, Kerridge
Which is probably 1 too many rookies to have on? Unless these guys will keep getting games?

Similar to mine, although I have Hall instead of Dusty so technically weaker than yours. Strong R1 for the like of Wells, Bennedy, Kerridge and Menadue, but I'm nervous about relying on them every week. Waiting for them to ripen.

I should say that if Parker scores well again this week I will be looking to find a way to get him in!

Looking at last year, Wingard and Parker had a similar floor, but Parker obviously had a higher and somewhat more consistent ceiling??
Still tossing up which one!
But I don't think Kerridge, Kennedy and Menadue should have much trouble about JS if they can keep up reasonable form say 70/80ish

[Blues Blues Blues]

Wingard (F3) or Parker (M6)

Parker.

Player v player I agree. Parker will score more. And at his price he is a bargain.

However Parker at M6 is strong and only leaves 2 spots for mid pricers or rookies. It also means his forward line is potentially weak from F3-6. I think there are better options for M6-8 who will score well (ie Libba, crouch, mills, Oliver) as opposed to fwd options available.

Thanks Guys, yeah I think I'm leaning towards Wingard otherwise my forward line will be something like Martin, Barlow, Wells, Bennedy, Menadue, Kerridge
Which is probably 1 too many rookies to have on? Unless these guys will keep getting games?

Similar to mine, although I have Hall instead of Dusty so technically weaker than yours. Strong R1 for the like of Wells, Bennedy, Kerridge and Menadue, but I'm nervous about relying on them every week. Waiting for them to ripen.

I should say that if Parker scores well again this week I will be looking to find a way to get him in!

Looking at last year, Wingard and Parker had a similar floor, but Parker obviously had a higher and somewhat more consistent ceiling??
Still tossing up which one!
But I don't think Kerridge, Kennedy and Menadue should have much trouble about JS if they can keep up reasonable form say 70/80ish

Yeah I'm not worried to much about JS, more so consistent scoring ability

[mzunguman]

Wingard (F3) or Parker (M6)

Parker.

Player v player I agree. Parker will score more. And at his price he is a bargain.

However Parker at M6 is strong and only leaves 2 spots for mid pricers or rookies. It also means his forward line is potentially weak from F3-6. I think there are better options for M6-8 who will score well (ie Libba, crouch, mills, Oliver) as opposed to fwd options available.

Thanks Guys, yeah I think I'm leaning towards Wingard otherwise my forward line will be something like Martin, Barlow, Wells, Bennedy, Menadue, Kerridge
Which is probably 1 too many rookies to have on? Unless these guys will keep getting games?

Similar to mine, although I have Hall instead of Dusty so technically weaker than yours. Strong R1 for the like of Wells, Bennedy, Kerridge and Menadue, but I'm nervous about relying on them every week. Waiting for them to ripen.

I should say that if Parker scores well again this week I will be looking to find a way to get him in!

Looking at last year, Wingard and Parker had a similar floor, but Parker obviously had a higher and somewhat more consistent ceiling??
Still tossing up which one!
But I don't think Kerridge, Kennedy and Menadue should have much trouble about JS if they can keep up reasonable form say 70/80ish

Yeah I'm not worried to much about JS, more so consistent scoring ability

Kerridge looked pretty good, as did Kennedy.... Menadue would be the only one I would have concerns over

[Blues Blues Blues]

Wingard (F3) or Parker (M6)

Parker.

Player v player I agree. Parker will score more. And at his price he is a bargain.

However Parker at M6 is strong and only leaves 2 spots for mid pricers or rookies. It also means his forward line is potentially weak from F3-6. I think there are better options for M6-8 who will score well (ie Libba, crouch, mills, Oliver) as opposed to fwd options available.

Thanks Guys, yeah I think I'm leaning towards Wingard otherwise my forward line will be something like Martin, Barlow, Wells, Bennedy, Menadue, Kerridge
Which is probably 1 too many rookies to have on? Unless these guys will keep getting games?

Similar to mine, although I have Hall instead of Dusty so technically weaker than yours. Strong R1 for the like of Wells, Bennedy, Kerridge and Menadue, but I'm nervous about relying on them every week. Waiting for them to ripen.

I should say that if Parker scores well again this week I will be looking to find a way to get him in!

Looking at last year, Wingard and Parker had a similar floor, but Parker obviously had a higher and somewhat more consistent ceiling??
Still tossing up which one!
But I don't think Kerridge, Kennedy and Menadue should have much trouble about JS if they can keep up reasonable form say 70/80ish

Yeah I'm not worried to much about JS, more so consistent scoring ability

Kerridge looked pretty good, as did Kennedy.... Menadue would be the only one I would have concerns over

Yeah Kerridge looked good but kicking was very poor. Bennedy I didn't see. Menadue scored well but agree I'm mostly concerned about him week in and week out

[Rusty00]

Hall vs Zorko?

[mzunguman]

Hall vs Zorko?

Hall... Should score similar but he is a lot cheaper! Zorko could possibly be playing more up forward this year which could yo-yo his scores

[GoLions]

Hall vs Zorko?

Hall... Should score similar but he is a lot cheaper! Zorko could possibly be playing more up forward this year which could yo-yo his scores

With the interchange cap he'll be spending plenty of time in the midfield. Think Leppa said this as well.

[mzunguman]

Hall vs Zorko?

Hall... Should score similar but he is a lot cheaper! Zorko could possibly be playing more up forward this year which could yo-yo his scores

With the interchange cap he'll be spending plenty of time in the midfield. Think Leppa said this as well.

Well.... I like Zorko more then lol

[Ringo]

Hall vs Zorko?

Hall... Should score similar but he is a lot cheaper! Zorko could possibly be playing more up forward this year which could yo-yo his scores

With the interchange cap he'll be spending plenty of time in the midfield. Think Leppa said this as well.

Well.... I like Zorko more then lol

Leppa has said he anticipates Zorks spending 90% in midfield.

[jfitty]

Hall vs Zorko?

Zorko for mine. He's got the runs on board and should spend plenty of time in the midfield

[gracey89]

Hall vs Zorko?

Zorko for mine. He's got the runs on board and should spend plenty of time in the midfield

+1 for me Jfitty!

[mzunguman]

Smitchell v Priddis

[billnats]

Johannisen v Gray v Priddis.

Johannisen means Papley has to start at F6.
Gray/Priddis means Dea starts at D6.