FIGJAM 2016

[quinny88]

Can't remember the last time I saw a team with a rookie at R2!
How much cash does this leave you with? You may need a bit extra for the rookie listed rookies that may not get games round 1

[kilbluff1985]

Can't remember the last time I saw a team with a rookie at R2!
How much cash does this leave you with? You may need a bit extra for the rookie listed rookies that may not get games round 1

literally 1k lol if i need extra would get Malceski or Salem instead of Bob

really it's kind of Tippett at R2 but going with the theory Michael will make more cash and score better then the forward rookies

[Bully]

Can't remember the last time I saw a team with a rookie at R2!
How much cash does this leave you with? You may need a bit extra for the rookie listed rookies that may not get games round 1

literally 1k lol if i need extra would get Malceski or Salem instead of Bob

really it's kind of Tippett at R2 but going with the theory Michael will make more cash and score better then the forward rookies

As a key position player I think he will struggle to match the output of the other rookies. The volatility of having 2 KP players in prime positions is a recipe for disaster, Tippett could score 35 one week and if Grimely has an off day you're Garnier Fructus.

[T Dog]

[quote author=Bully link=topic=105198.msg1720804#msg1720804 date=1456737005

As a key position player I think he will struggle to match the output of the other rookies. The volatility of having 2 KP players in prime positions is a recipe for disaster, Tippett could score 35 one week and if Grimely has an off day you're Garnier Fructus.
[/quote]

You're stylish KB  ;D

[Nige]

I like the bold move of a rookie at R2. Could be genius if you get away with it.

It does allow you to get away with more premos in fwd/def and that's always handy.

If you decide against the rookie ruck starting, who are you looking at to replace him and how would that affect the rest of your team? Would you go lighter up forward or down back?

[kilbluff1985]

I like the bold move of a rookie at R2. Could be genius if you get away with it.

It does allow you to get away with more premos in fwd/def and that's always handy.

If you decide against the rookie ruck starting, who are you looking at to replace him and how would that affect the rest of your team? Would you go lighter up forward or down back?

this is my standard team

[kilbluff1985]

liking this structure no cash left

[kilbluff1985]

current team

[sammy123]

solid can't fault it

[kilbluff1985]

final team besides rookies

[Gandalf123]

this team is sick mate - feel like the back line makes up for the 1 less prem midfielder you're going with compared to everyone else who are rolling with 5 and libba - good shower

[piesfan1989]

Mind if I ask why you selected yeo? He didn't show many positive signs in NAB?

[kilbluff1985]

Mind if I ask why you selected yeo? He didn't show many positive signs in NAB?

NAB is only relevant for rookies

[GoLions]

How much cash left kb? Keays may have to become someone such as Oliver, but looks really good apart from that!

[kilbluff1985]

How much cash left kb? Keays may have to become someone such as Oliver, but looks really good apart from that!

11k

after i have changed it though but i can go Crouch to Oliver and Keays to Parish if i need to