Rookie discussions and when to cash

[fanTCfool]

Sam Reid is a confirmed starter

[mzunguman]

Sam Reid is a confirmed starter

Whose spot is he taking?!

[fanTCfool]

Sam Reid is a confirmed starter

Whose spot is he taking?!

Could be anyone, not sure, perhaps Patton?

[Judd Magic]

Carlisle out will help Austin.

Lee should have some JS now but he is a spud.

Dunno why people think Lee is a spud.  He's a quality ball user.

Looked like a spud as a forward tho.

[mzunguman]

Sam Reid is a confirmed starter

Whose spot is he taking?!

Could be anyone, not sure, perhaps Patton?

A better option than Phillips from Collingwood?

[Judd Magic]

Sam Reid is a confirmed starter

Whose spot is he taking?!

Could be anyone, not sure, perhaps Patton?

A better option than Phillips from Collingwood?

We will just have to see.

Without seeing them though and just looking at both teams in general I reckon Phillips would have the better JS as GWS have way more depth than Collingwood.

I can see Phillips doing a Josh Smith.

[King_Robbo]

Hopper named on the bench. I think he may get the chop as he's been mainly playing forward. Only 57% tog last week. Warning signs...

[RaisyDaisy]

Hopper named on the bench. I think he may get the chop as he's been mainly playing forward. Only 57% tog last week. Warning signs...

I'd like him to play just to squeeze out another 15k but I'm trading him and Davis to Trengove and Jansen next week regardless

[King_Robbo]

Hopper named on the bench. I think he may get the chop as he's been mainly playing forward. Only 57% tog last week. Warning signs...

I'd like him to play just to squeeze out another 15k but I'm trading him and Davis to Trengove and Jansen next week regardless

Really? I got him for the purpose of good bye coverage. Rd 13 & 14 they play Ess and then Carlton.. I can see GWS winning those games and Hopper being given plenty of mid minutes and maybe sneak out a 100+ score

Kicking myself though, I really wanted to go Blakely that week but I was $3k shy. Ouch

[RaisyDaisy]

Hopper named on the bench. I think he may get the chop as he's been mainly playing forward. Only 57% tog last week. Warning signs...

I'd like him to play just to squeeze out another 15k but I'm trading him and Davis to Trengove and Jansen next week regardless

Really? I got him for the purpose of good bye coverage. Rd 13 & 14 they play Ess and then Carlton.. I can see GWS winning those games and Hopper being given plenty of mid minutes and maybe sneak out a 100+ score

Kicking myself though, I really wanted to go Blakely that week but I was $3k shy. Ouch

Hopper and Jansen share the same bye so it works for me. Besides Hopper's first game he hasn't done anything special, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him get rested or dropped soon too

[King_Robbo]

Hopper named on the bench. I think he may get the chop as he's been mainly playing forward. Only 57% tog last week. Warning signs...

I'd like him to play just to squeeze out another 15k but I'm trading him and Davis to Trengove and Jansen next week regardless

Really? I got him for the purpose of good bye coverage. Rd 13 & 14 they play Ess and then Carlton.. I can see GWS winning those games and Hopper being given plenty of mid minutes and maybe sneak out a 100+ score

Kicking myself though, I really wanted to go Blakely that week but I was $3k shy. Ouch

Hopper and Jansen share the same bye so it works for me. Besides Hopper's first game he hasn't done anything special, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him get rested or dropped soon too

Oh harsh. Since his first game against GC he's played arguably three of the tougher games to score in fantasy this year.. Dogs, Adelaide away and Geelong away. Sydney this week is again a massive test but GWSs run opens up big time before and after their bye round.. If it suits your team structure then fair enough but I'm saying it could come back to bite you in a big fashion..
I'll call it here and now, he could easily go 100 v Ess 80 v Carl - bye - 80 v collingwood 80 v Brisbane which would mean I price rise to around $380k + great bye round scores...

[RaisyDaisy]

Hopper named on the bench. I think he may get the chop as he's been mainly playing forward. Only 57% tog last week. Warning signs...

I'd like him to play just to squeeze out another 15k but I'm trading him and Davis to Trengove and Jansen next week regardless

Really? I got him for the purpose of good bye coverage. Rd 13 & 14 they play Ess and then Carlton.. I can see GWS winning those games and Hopper being given plenty of mid minutes and maybe sneak out a 100+ score

Kicking myself though, I really wanted to go Blakely that week but I was $3k shy. Ouch

Hopper and Jansen share the same bye so it works for me. Besides Hopper's first game he hasn't done anything special, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him get rested or dropped soon too

Oh harsh. Since his first game against GC he's played arguably three of the tougher games to score in fantasy this year.. Dogs, Adelaide away and Geelong away. Sydney this week is again a massive test but GWSs run opens up big time before and after their bye round.. If it suits your team structure then fair enough but I'm saying it could come back to bite you in a big fashion..
I'll call it here and now, he could easily go 100 v Ess 80 v Carl - bye - 80 v collingwood 80 v Brisbane which would mean I price rise to around $380k + great bye round scores...

Yeah you're probably right, but I'm not passing on Jansen so Hopper has to make way

[PICCOLLO]

Hopper named on the bench. I think he may get the chop as he's been mainly playing forward. Only 57% tog last week. Warning signs...

I'd like him to play just to squeeze out another 15k but I'm trading him and Davis to Trengove and Jansen next week regardless

Really? I got him for the purpose of good bye coverage. Rd 13 & 14 they play Ess and then Carlton.. I can see GWS winning those games and Hopper being given plenty of mid minutes and maybe sneak out a 100+ score

Kicking myself though, I really wanted to go Blakely that week but I was $3k shy. Ouch

Hopper and Jansen share the same bye so it works for me. Besides Hopper's first game he hasn't done anything special, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him get rested or dropped soon too

Oh harsh. Since his first game against GC he's played arguably three of the tougher games to score in fantasy this year.. Dogs, Adelaide away and Geelong away. Sydney this week is again a massive test but GWSs run opens up big time before and after their bye round.. If it suits your team structure then fair enough but I'm saying it could come back to bite you in a big fashion..
I'll call it here and now, he could easily go 100 v Ess 80 v Carl - bye - 80 v collingwood 80 v Brisbane which would mean I price rise to around $380k + great bye round scores...

Yeah you're probably right, but I'm not passing on Jansen so Hopper has to make way

Ideally you'd keep Hopper until his bye but when decent rookies present themselves, there's often a sacrifice to make.

[pikla]

Opinions on who is the better downgrade target, Logan Austin or Tom Lee?

[GoLions]

Opinions on who is the better downgrade target, Logan Austin or Tom Lee?

Lee should have decent JS for the next month or so