Fasttrack's 2016 Teams + Discussion

[fasttrack13]

I'dgo wines > crouch then mccarthy > wells and howe > lonergan/sheridan/seedsman

Then you're looking a bit safer.

mccarthy won't put anything above 60 on the scoreboard. he started well this weekend then fell off the face of the earth.

wines stays no matter what, he's a lock for me.

Not sure why you'd recommend those 3 defenders they're really in no mans land. Not sure any will be premiums therefore won't make enough cash. Lonergan tagged last year, Sheridan has too much competition for points, Seedsman maybe but still has an undefined role. I

Agree on McCarthy I just couldn't afford Gresham so I need to shed a couple of K from somewhere

[piesfan1989]

Whoever you choose is up to you, but I just think you're far too exposed on your back/fwd line

[fasttrack13]

Whoever you choose is up to you, but I just think you're far too exposed on your back/fwd line

I understand but I'd just like to know a little more on what you mean...
Yeah it's weakish but i think I have:
6 forward near certainties - Bennell, Barlow, Robinson, Kennedy, Menadue and Kerridge
6 Defence near certainties - Shaw, Macmillan, Howe/Aish/Mackenzie, Weitering, Brown, Hartley

As long as you're fielding 25+ players and 22 scorers on field. Plus I see more rookie price players in forward and defence.

[fasttrack13]

Last Team: 1 Decision still to be made!

DEFENCE:
H.Shaw, J.Macmillan, J.Weitering, M.Dea, M.Brown, M.Adams (AMT, Ruggles)

MIDFIELD:
N.Fyfe, P.Dangerfield, S.Pendlebury, M.Priddis or G.Ablett, T.Rockliff, O.Wines, T.Liberatore, C.Mills (C.Mendadue, J.Gresham, R.Davis)

RUCKMAN:
T.Goldstein, S.Martin (S.Grimley)

FORWARDS:
M.Barlow, M.Robinson, D.Wells, C.Ellis, B.Kennedy, S.Kerridge (L.McCarthy, M.McGovern)

[TomK]

Ablett surely and why do you have Ruggles?

[fasttrack13]

Ablett surely and why do you have Ruggles?

Only viable loophole option for the week who actually may play in the latter and no other rookies to fit my structure

He's played 4of the last 26 Goldcoast matches.

[TomK]

Ablett surely and why do you have Ruggles?

Only viable loophole option for the week who actually may play in the latter and no other rookies to fit my structure

He's played 4of the last 26 Goldcoast matches.

Pick your loophole option in R3, not D8. And yeah he may get games, why take that risk? Wouldn't you rather a playing rookie? You're probably too attached to 6 premo mids by now but I'd downgrade one and upgrade Ruggles, would help with cash generation and won't have to rely on so many rookies playing in defence.

[fasttrack13]

Ablett surely and why do you have Ruggles?

Only viable loophole option for the week who actually may play in the latter and no other rookies to fit my structure

He's played 4of the last 26 Goldcoast matches.

Pick your loophole option in R3, not D8. And yeah he may get games, why take that risk? Wouldn't you rather a playing rookie? You're probably too attached to 6 premo mids by now but I'd downgrade one and upgrade Ruggles, would help with cash generation and won't have to rely on so many rookies playing in defence.

So I've gone:

Grimley to A.Smith for loophole
Ruggles to Cowan
Gresham to Dunkley

Meaning I had to go Priddis over ablett