Main Menu

The Brownlow

Started by Torpedo10, September 28, 2015, 08:47:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jvalles69

My totals:

Geelong/Richmond/Pies $3.20 (90 + 51 + 62 = 203)
Dogs/Carlton/Hawks $2.40 (72 + 47 + 76 = 195)
North/Saints/Dees $2.65 (67 + 67 + 71 = 205)

Interesting!

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: jvalles69 on September 23, 2016, 12:30:54 AM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on September 23, 2016, 12:02:39 AM
Not sure on Pendles actually, so I'll give that group and all the other groups a miss because they're all tight, but I think Ward in Group E is the one to go with.

Polling history would say Ward, depends if umps notice Zerrett too.  If they do, it'll be tight I think, but yeah Ward at $1.95 is great value.  Can you multi the groups together?

Zerrett and possibly Hunter are the threats I reckon, but Wards history is very good and $1.95 does seem to be good value

Ward in this group, and Conigs for most GWS votes at $2.20 both have me very tempted. They're the only 2 bets I'm considering on top of the 3 I've already done

madskill55

Been a bit quiet lately lads...been destroying the TAB in brownlow bets.

FYI you can multi groups together as I did it last week.
I smashed Ward who opened at $2.75 in that group.
Also in the last group I have smashed Wells. He started at $5, into $4.25 but had a saver on steele who opened at $3.6 and now is into $2.9.

Bont has been smashed in Group A in te last 48 hours. Pass on Group A
Group B - Priddis started at $2.75 and has come into $2.1
Group C - Gawn is the market mover moving from 3.75-2.5

Personally ward in Group E is my big bet. Think he will poll around 15-18 votes and that should see him win, zerrett will be the only challenger but with ess winning few games it would be hard for Zach to do well with limited winning games and polling history...

P.S- Fwiw i think coniglio will just pip warddespitewards polling history.

elephants

Lads that have their own counts, would you be so kind as to hit me with the Freo team totals? Obviously Neale will piss it home, but the battle for second is pretty intriguing!

The_Captain

Quote from: elephants on September 23, 2016, 11:03:51 AM
Lads that have their own counts, would you be so kind as to hit me with the Freo team totals? Obviously Neale will piss it home, but the battle for second is pretty intriguing!

Steer clear of that market i have

15 neale
4 walters, fyfe, hill
3, barlow, mundy, ballantyne

elephants

Quote from: The_Captain on September 23, 2016, 01:32:01 PM
Quote from: elephants on September 23, 2016, 11:03:51 AM
Lads that have their own counts, would you be so kind as to hit me with the Freo team totals? Obviously Neale will piss it home, but the battle for second is pretty intriguing!

Steer clear of that market i have

15 neale
4 walters, fyfe, hill
3, barlow, mundy, ballantyne

fark interesting

kilbluff1985

Danger/Parker quinella @4.50 is the value i like not confident about Dusty since Richmond didn't win many games

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on September 23, 2016, 01:42:19 PM
Danger/Parker quinella @4.50 is the value i like not confident about Dusty since Richmond didn't win many games

Dusty should still go very close

Priddis won the Brownlow when we didn't make the 8

jvalles69

Just looking at those groups and damn there is some good value.

Group A - Parker @ $3.50 over Bont, Sloane, Mitchell, Selwood, Steven
Group B - Gray @ $3.75 over Priddis, Coniglio, Kennedy, Treloar, Gibbs
Group C - Betts is epic value @ $11 over Gawn, Franklin, Kennedy, Riewoldt, Goldy
Group D - Avoid at all costs Pendles, Lewis, Neale, Gaff, Shiel, Viney
Group E - Ward @ $1.95 over Zerrett, Titchell, Hunter, Tyson, Wines
Group F - Wells @ $4.25 over Sidey, Ross, Crouch, Enright, Johanisson

I might be dropping so more coin on these.

Money Shot

Do we all reckon that

Danger
Parker
Martin

Is a pretty safe top 3? Without Sloane?

jvalles69

Quote from: Money Shot on September 23, 2016, 07:16:37 PM
Do we all reckon that

Danger
Parker
Martin

Is a pretty safe top 3? Without Sloane?

Not me, I've got Jelwood ahead of Martin.

Money Shot

Quote from: jvalles69 on September 23, 2016, 07:43:13 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on September 23, 2016, 07:16:37 PM
Do we all reckon that

Danger
Parker
Martin

Is a pretty safe top 3? Without Sloane?

Not me, I've got Jelwood ahead of Martin.

yeah that could be fair enough! Danger and Selwood steal so many points off each other hahahaha

kilbluff1985

u know what i find really strange

there are so many bets in BYO Brownlow request a bet the top 7 in any order so many that don't have Jelwood what are they thinking

jvalles69

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on September 24, 2016, 01:49:42 PM
u know what i find really strange

there are so many bets in BYO Brownlow request a bet the top 7 in any order so many that don't have Jelwood what are they thinking

This is what I saw too thats why I requested one.

PowerBug

Quote from: Gigantor on September 28, 2015, 11:49:04 PM
First year of betting for me....fail

Lesson learnt, don't touch ruckmen  :-[

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on June 06, 2016, 06:54:26 PM
Hunter wont score as well as most think based on breakout players in the past

A couple of points from earlier in this thread worth reminding people of :) I'm trying to work out which way to lean for my tips for the night but Jack Steven is an interesting one. Saints did win 12 games this year and I think his good games are all 3 vote games!
Leader of the King Karl Amon fan club
Coach of WXV side Rio De Janeiro Jaguars
2023 SC: Rank 126