Round 22 Geelong v Collingwood - Friday 28th August 19:50 - MCG

[Jay]

You beauty! Go Pies! ;D

[TomK]

And there it is! Go you Pies ;D ;D

[Grazz]

Owe you one Pie's.  ;)

[LF]

unscaled

46   Mark Blicavs   117
10   Daniel Menzel   112
4   Andrew Mackie   93
20   Steve Johnson   82
44   Corey Enright   76
8   Jake Kolodjashnij   75
9   James Kelly   70
29   Cameron Guthrie   69
7   Harry Taylor   68
3   Jimmy Bartel   58
13   Tom Lonergan   57
32   Steven Motlop   48
14   Joel Selwood   47
28   Cory Gregson   44
11   Darcy Lang   44
24   Jed Bews   44
5   Nakia Cockatoo   43
30   Nathan Vardy   40
26   Tom Hawkins   33
34   Josh Walker   32
40   Jackson Thurlow   31
21   Jordan Murdoch   25
TOTAL1308

10   Scott Pendlebury   146
22   Steele Sidebottom   139
13   Taylor Adams   128
4   Brodie Grundy   118
25   Jack Crisp   118
8   Tom Langdon   95
19   Levi Greenwood   89
35   Jordan De Goey   85
1   Alex Fasolo   84
5   Jamie Elliott   83
26   Marley Williams   79
18   Travis Varcoe   79
36   Dane Swan   78
20   Ben Reid   76
9   Jesse White   72
11   Jarryd Blair   65
28   Ben Sinclair   64
37   Brayden Maynard   58
30   Darcy Moore   56
12   Matthew Scharenberg   55
16   Nathan J. Brown   41
17   Jonathon Marsh   23
TOTAL1831

[T Dog]

;D

Go Crows.

Pies did it for Dangerfield Grazz   ;D

[Grazz]

;D

Go Crows.

Pies did it for Dangerfield Grazz   ;D

I fart in your general direction Sir.

[TomK]

https://twitter.com/CollingwoodFC/status/637238174696243200

[T Dog]

;D

Go Crows.

Pies did it for Dangerfield Grazz   ;D

I fart in your general direction Sir.

Tis but a scratch

[fanTCfool]

Starting J Kolo next year, got potential - here's hoping he can do what his brother has done this year

[Grazz]

;D

Go Crows.

Pies did it for Dangerfield Grazz   ;D

I fart in your general direction Sir.

Tis but a scratch

Till the sores start to fester.  :P
See how you are in a week. ;D

[Jukes]

So Pendles gets 146 scaled up to 155 for 4/32 contested touches and no clearances? That's complete flowering BULLshower.

Stants does that every week and gets 90 SC to 140 DT with a seagull/astronaut next to his name on FF, while Pendles gets a star?

Direct comparison: Pendles tonight vs Stants round 11 (that round because similar outputs)
21 kicks vs 22
11 handballs vs 9
11 marks vs 11
6 tackles vs 9
4 contested possessions vs 9
0 clearances vs 5
0 clangers vs 1
142 DT vs 153
155 SC vs 141

Champion Data are complete bullshower-artists

[Big Mac]

Just lol

[Grazz]

So Pendles gets 146 scaled up to 155 for 4/32 contested touches and no clearances? That's complete flowering BULLshower.

Stants does that every week and gets 90 SC to 140 DT with a seagull/astronaut next to his name on FF, while Pendles gets a star?

Direct comparison: Pendles tonight vs Stants round 11 (that round because similar outputs)
21 kicks vs 22
11 handballs vs 9
11 marks vs 11
6 tackles vs 9
4 contested possessions vs 9
0 clearances vs 5
0 clangers vs 1
142 DT vs 153
155 SC vs 141

Champion Data are complete bullshower-artists

Need to build a bridge mate, i did 4 years ago life is so much better now. ;)

[RaisyDaisy]

Jukes when are you going to realise that SC is not like crappy DT giving points just for touches?

SC weighs points on impact. Pendles might not have racked up contested possessions but his IMPACT was massive, and despite what anyone thinks SC does weigh scoring towards impact as well as many other things.

People need to stop focussing purely on a players stats. Do that with DT. SC is much more advanced and factors in a lot more than just physical stats

Can't believe this conversation still comes up so regularly. Get the live SC scores in front of you while watching a live match. Do that for shower loads of matches like I have and then you'll get the true feel for how SC points are given, and then finally you'll get it

[Jukes]

No clearances, 4 inside-50s (Crisp had 9), 4 rebound-50s, 2 goal assists (Adams with 3), 4 1%ers = impact? Surely Crisp, Adams, Greenwood, and Grundy had more impact despite far less SC?

There is no way you can say that if Pendlebury was named Joe Smith and put up that performance he'd score the same, let alone close to the same.