SuperCoach Finals

Started by fanTCfool, August 24, 2015, 10:48:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Grazz

Quote from: Dudge on September 17, 2015, 11:34:21 PM
:)
Quote from: Grazz on September 17, 2015, 10:39:39 PM
Quote from: Dudge on September 17, 2015, 10:20:22 PM
Quote from: Grazz on September 17, 2015, 09:39:30 PM
Quote from: Dudge on September 15, 2015, 06:56:57 PM
Quote from: nostradamus on September 14, 2015, 10:29:40 PM
Quote from: Dudge on September 14, 2015, 09:50:21 PM
:)
Quote from: fanTCfool on September 14, 2015, 09:41:17 PM
Does anyone here the owner of or know the owner of 'Shearers' coached by Neil?

Yeah that's nas, great 8-ball player :)

Should organise some games down at The Empire when I'm visiting Adelaide sometime ......... and a couple of drinks too of course  8)

Long as you partner Grazz ;D

Pfffft me partner let me down.  :P
9 games over the pub the other night, undefeated owned the table. They were all cracking the showers in the end.

What do you expect in the crèche room

6 of them were from the Playfords 8ball team, not much of a team. ;)

EDIT: Check your bloody phone by the way.  :-\

ok calm down



GCSkiwi

Quote from: LordSneeze on September 17, 2015, 12:25:50 PM
Yeah Macmillian is a risk at his price when Hansen could go 100+, but it is very possible he goes 40 and Macmillian goes 100. as im a few hundred behind the leaders i need to take a risk with some selections. Part of the reason im also likely to go Henderson. Smith hasn't trained at all this week.

Was originally going to go sloane, but expected Mitchell to be more damaging and less chance of spudding.
Crouch was the sub in the match against the Hawks and came on when the game was over. Still maanged to get 13 touches in only 20% game time.
Yeah i ignored Garner because of the sub risk.

Good info on Smith, Ta for that - I've barely looked at how people have been tracking this week. And good point on Crouch, might be worth giving him another run... Part of me really wants to pick Lewis as I think he'll be relatively unique and must be due a decent game, but then another part of me says that the reason he'll be unique is because he's been decidedly average most of the year!

fanTCfool

Who will North tag tomorrow?
Jacobs especially, surely JPK will be looked at, but can he be stopped?

fanTCfool

Here's a new theory to consider when thinking about player value for the finals.
Derived from a post from LordSneeze a few weeks back.

if Player Score x 4 > Player Price (000's) = Win
if Player Score x 4 < Player Price (000's) = Loss

Examples from Week One:
Biggs: Score = 84 x 4 = 336, Price = 295.8 ($295,800) WIN
Hutchings: Score = 110 x 4 = 440, Price = 262.8 ($262,800) Big WIN
I. Smith: Score = 73 x 4 = 292, Price = 386.3 ($386,300) LOSS
Ibbotson: Score = 70 x 4 = 280, Price = 363.0 ($363,000) LOSS

Sound Reasonable?

Big Mac

Quote from: fanTCfool on September 18, 2015, 08:03:44 PM
Who will North tag tomorrow?
Jacobs especially, surely JPK will be looked at, but can he be stopped?

He will go to Hanners I think

You kind of lost me with the 'theory' :P what's the point of it?

GCSkiwi

Well, fair to say I've butchered this round (even if it is only QT)

My team:

Hendo, Smith, MacMillan
Danger, Titch, Crouch, Heeney
McEvoy
Boomer, Knight, Turner

I had all of Lewis, Goodes, Schoey, Hansen, and Burgoyne in there at one stage... What a difference that could have been. Disaster.

fanTCfool

Quote from: Big  Mac on September 18, 2015, 11:38:55 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on September 18, 2015, 08:03:44 PM
Who will North tag tomorrow?
Jacobs especially, surely JPK will be looked at, but can he be stopped?

He will go to Hanners I think

You kind of lost me with the 'theory' :P what's the point of it?

The higher the positive gap between Score and Price, the better value a player is.

fanTCfool

Made a late change:

FROM: Tippett, Towers
TO: Boomer, Rose

Oops  :'(

Gigantor

1201 this week

JPK C  8)

Tippet and S.Mitchell (VC) :)

Rose, B.Smith and Shaw  :-[

Big Mac

1203

B Smith, Turner and McEvoy the main potatos

T Dog


kilbluff1985

i didn't even do finals in any comp this year was so over it

Big Mac

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on September 20, 2015, 05:17:08 PM
i didn't even do finals in any comp this year was so over it

Just weaning myself off it kb

I can't stop cold turkey like you :P

GCSkiwi

Ahhhh it was ugly. 1083 in the end...

GCSkiwi

Batter up, round 3:

Lake, Hurn, Hansen
Hodge, Neale, Barlow, Hutchings
McEvoy
Schoey, Breust, Balla.