last trade buddy to ryder

[whynot102]

With Steele out need to trade Buddy or field Dale only have $20k left thinking Ryder for ruck cover or go Ziebell

[nas]

Well if you have nic nat being a late out, Ryder seems the way to go.

[enzedder]

Well if you have nic nat being a late out, Ryder seems the way to go.

Probably going to be a popular move for those not wanting to drop 100+ pts courtesy of a Nic Nat doughnut.
Buddy has lost a lot of coin and without cash in the bank Ryder with the DPP ruck rookie option looks sound.

[Dons]

Well if you have nic nat being a late out, Ryder seems the way to go.

Probably going to be a popular move for those not wanting to drop 100+ pts courtesy of a Nic Nat doughnut.
Buddy has lost a lot of coin and without cash in the bank Ryder with the DPP ruck rookie option looks sound.

Or Sinclair. If Nic Nat misses more than 1, he certainly won't be dropped, and is in better form than Ryder IMO. With out goals Ryder had struggled this year, like Port.
These are my options too, although trading Buckley out and swinging McGovern back to achieve it.
Other option is trade Nic Nat to Martin. Decisions...

[PICCOLLO]

Well if you have nic nat being a late out, Ryder seems the way to go.

Probably going to be a popular move for those not wanting to drop 100+ pts courtesy of a Nic Nat doughnut.
Buddy has lost a lot of coin and without cash in the bank Ryder with the DPP ruck rookie option looks sound.

Or Sinclair. If Nic Nat misses more than 1, he certainly won't be dropped, and is in better form than Ryder IMO. With out goals Ryder had struggled this year, like Port.
These are my options too, although trading Buckley out and swinging McGovern back to achieve it.
Other option is trade Nic Nat to Martin. Decisions...

Disagree on Sinclair.  Not sure on your logic about him retaining his position. (its not ideal ruck cover when your cover will only play if one particular ruck is out) Ryder is a better option. Yes, Ryder/Port's form hasn't been great but you can't say that Ryder has been crap but got a few goals.  The reality is he plays fwd and kicks a few goals. That's where he gets points. Ryder will average around 80 for the rest of the year IMO.  That's good cover.

[Dons]

Well if you have nic nat being a late out, Ryder seems the way to go.

Probably going to be a popular move for those not wanting to drop 100+ pts courtesy of a Nic Nat doughnut.
Buddy has lost a lot of coin and without cash in the bank Ryder with the DPP ruck rookie option looks sound.

Or Sinclair. If Nic Nat misses more than 1, he certainly won't be dropped, and is in better form than Ryder IMO. With out goals Ryder had struggled this year, like Port.
These are my options too, although trading Buckley out and swinging McGovern back to achieve it.
Other option is trade Nic Nat to Martin. Decisions...

Disagree on Sinclair.  Not sure on your logic about him retaining his position. (its not ideal ruck cover when your cover will only play if one particular ruck is out) Ryder is a better option. Yes, Ryder/Port's form hasn't been great but you can't say that Ryder has been crap but got a few goals.  The reality is he plays fwd and kicks a few goals. That's where he gets points. Ryder will average around 80 for the rest of the year IMO.  That's good cover.

Sinclair has been the number 2 ruck the last few months, Lycett will go out before him. Sinclair has outscored Nic Nat the past 2 weeks and is playing really well (not just scoring well in SC). With this option you are guaranteed one of Nic Nat or Sinclair will play. That's my logic, not saying it's perfect but I think it's pretty sound. Sinclair also had a BE of 5 or something like that.

[PICCOLLO]

Well if you have nic nat being a late out, Ryder seems the way to go.

Probably going to be a popular move for those not wanting to drop 100+ pts courtesy of a Nic Nat doughnut.
Buddy has lost a lot of coin and without cash in the bank Ryder with the DPP ruck rookie option looks sound.

Or Sinclair. If Nic Nat misses more than 1, he certainly won't be dropped, and is in better form than Ryder IMO. With out goals Ryder had struggled this year, like Port.
These are my options too, although trading Buckley out and swinging McGovern back to achieve it.
Other option is trade Nic Nat to Martin. Decisions...

Disagree on Sinclair.  Not sure on your logic about him retaining his position. (its not ideal ruck cover when your cover will only play if one particular ruck is out) Ryder is a better option. Yes, Ryder/Port's form hasn't been great but you can't say that Ryder has been crap but got a few goals.  The reality is he plays fwd and kicks a few goals. That's where he gets points. Ryder will average around 80 for the rest of the year IMO.  That's good cover.

Sinclair has been the number 2 ruck the last few months, Lycett will go out before him. Sinclair has outscored Nic Nat the past 2 weeks and is playing really well (not just scoring well in SC). With this option you are guaranteed one of Nic Nat or Sinclair will play. That's my logic, not saying it's perfect but I think it's pretty sound. Sinclair also had a BE of 5 or something like that.

Ah sorry, my bad. Was thinking Lycett.  Yeah, you're right, he's pretty solid and certainly has been doing well of late.  He's not a R/F though, is he?  I think the fact you can swing Ryder fwd if needed gives him a bit more edge

[Dons]

Well if you have nic nat being a late out, Ryder seems the way to go.

Probably going to be a popular move for those not wanting to drop 100+ pts courtesy of a Nic Nat doughnut.
Buddy has lost a lot of coin and without cash in the bank Ryder with the DPP ruck rookie option looks sound.

Or Sinclair. If Nic Nat misses more than 1, he certainly won't be dropped, and is in better form than Ryder IMO. With out goals Ryder had struggled this year, like Port.
These are my options too, although trading Buckley out and swinging McGovern back to achieve it.
Other option is trade Nic Nat to Martin. Decisions...

Disagree on Sinclair.  Not sure on your logic about him retaining his position. (its not ideal ruck cover when your cover will only play if one particular ruck is out) Ryder is a better option. Yes, Ryder/Port's form hasn't been great but you can't say that Ryder has been crap but got a few goals.  The reality is he plays fwd and kicks a few goals. That's where he gets points. Ryder will average around 80 for the rest of the year IMO.  That's good cover.

Sinclair has been the number 2 ruck the last few months, Lycett will go out before him. Sinclair has outscored Nic Nat the past 2 weeks and is playing really well (not just scoring well in SC). With this option you are guaranteed one of Nic Nat or Sinclair will play. That's my logic, not saying it's perfect but I think it's pretty sound. Sinclair also had a BE of 5 or something like that.

Ah sorry, my bad. Was thinking Lycett.  Yeah, you're right, he's pretty solid and certainly has been doing well of late.  He's not a R/F though, is he?  I think the fact you can swing Ryder fwd if needed gives him a bit more edge

All good.

Yep, he sure is. And about $50k cheaper with more Sunday games coming up later in the year.

[PICCOLLO]

Well if you have nic nat being a late out, Ryder seems the way to go.

Probably going to be a popular move for those not wanting to drop 100+ pts courtesy of a Nic Nat doughnut.
Buddy has lost a lot of coin and without cash in the bank Ryder with the DPP ruck rookie option looks sound.

Or Sinclair. If Nic Nat misses more than 1, he certainly won't be dropped, and is in better form than Ryder IMO. With out goals Ryder had struggled this year, like Port.
These are my options too, although trading Buckley out and swinging McGovern back to achieve it.
Other option is trade Nic Nat to Martin. Decisions...

Disagree on Sinclair.  Not sure on your logic about him retaining his position. (its not ideal ruck cover when your cover will only play if one particular ruck is out) Ryder is a better option. Yes, Ryder/Port's form hasn't been great but you can't say that Ryder has been crap but got a few goals.  The reality is he plays fwd and kicks a few goals. That's where he gets points. Ryder will average around 80 for the rest of the year IMO.  That's good cover.

Sinclair has been the number 2 ruck the last few months, Lycett will go out before him. Sinclair has outscored Nic Nat the past 2 weeks and is playing really well (not just scoring well in SC). With this option you are guaranteed one of Nic Nat or Sinclair will play. That's my logic, not saying it's perfect but I think it's pretty sound. Sinclair also had a BE of 5 or something like that.

Ah sorry, my bad. Was thinking Lycett.  Yeah, you're right, he's pretty solid and certainly has been doing well of late.  He's not a R/F though, is he?  I think the fact you can swing Ryder fwd if needed gives him a bit more edge

All good.

Yep, he sure is. And about $50k cheaper with more Sunday games coming up later in the year.

looks pretty good on paper. great POD too. You've done your research ;)

[Dons]

Well if you have nic nat being a late out, Ryder seems the way to go.

Probably going to be a popular move for those not wanting to drop 100+ pts courtesy of a Nic Nat doughnut.
Buddy has lost a lot of coin and without cash in the bank Ryder with the DPP ruck rookie option looks sound.

Or Sinclair. If Nic Nat misses more than 1, he certainly won't be dropped, and is in better form than Ryder IMO. With out goals Ryder had struggled this year, like Port.
These are my options too, although trading Buckley out and swinging McGovern back to achieve it.
Other option is trade Nic Nat to Martin. Decisions...

Disagree on Sinclair.  Not sure on your logic about him retaining his position. (its not ideal ruck cover when your cover will only play if one particular ruck is out) Ryder is a better option. Yes, Ryder/Port's form hasn't been great but you can't say that Ryder has been crap but got a few goals.  The reality is he plays fwd and kicks a few goals. That's where he gets points. Ryder will average around 80 for the rest of the year IMO.  That's good cover.

Sinclair has been the number 2 ruck the last few months, Lycett will go out before him. Sinclair has outscored Nic Nat the past 2 weeks and is playing really well (not just scoring well in SC). With this option you are guaranteed one of Nic Nat or Sinclair will play. That's my logic, not saying it's perfect but I think it's pretty sound. Sinclair also had a BE of 5 or something like that.

Ah sorry, my bad. Was thinking Lycett.  Yeah, you're right, he's pretty solid and certainly has been doing well of late.  He's not a R/F though, is he?  I think the fact you can swing Ryder fwd if needed gives him a bit more edge

All good.

Yep, he sure is. And about $50k cheaper with more Sunday games coming up later in the year.

looks pretty good on paper. great POD too. You've done your research ;)

Oh no...

[Grazz]

Well if you have nic nat being a late out, Ryder seems the way to go.

Probably going to be a popular move for those not wanting to drop 100+ pts courtesy of a Nic Nat doughnut.
Buddy has lost a lot of coin and without cash in the bank Ryder with the DPP ruck rookie option looks sound.

Or Sinclair. If Nic Nat misses more than 1, he certainly won't be dropped, and is in better form than Ryder IMO. With out goals Ryder had struggled this year, like Port.
These are my options too, although trading Buckley out and swinging McGovern back to achieve it.
Other option is trade Nic Nat to Martin. Decisions...

Disagree on Sinclair.  Not sure on your logic about him retaining his position. (its not ideal ruck cover when your cover will only play if one particular ruck is out) Ryder is a better option. Yes, Ryder/Port's form hasn't been great but you can't say that Ryder has been crap but got a few goals.  The reality is he plays fwd and kicks a few goals. That's where he gets points. Ryder will average around 80 for the rest of the year IMO.  That's good cover.

Sinclair has been the number 2 ruck the last few months, Lycett will go out before him. Sinclair has outscored Nic Nat the past 2 weeks and is playing really well (not just scoring well in SC). With this option you are guaranteed one of Nic Nat or Sinclair will play. That's my logic, not saying it's perfect but I think it's pretty sound. Sinclair also had a BE of 5 or something like that.

Ah sorry, my bad. Was thinking Lycett.  Yeah, you're right, he's pretty solid and certainly has been doing well of late.  He's not a R/F though, is he?  I think the fact you can swing Ryder fwd if needed gives him a bit more edge

All good.

Yep, he sure is. And about $50k cheaper with more Sunday games coming up later in the year.

looks pretty good on paper. great POD too. You've done your research ;)

Oh no...

Unlucky mate.  :(

[Dons]

Well if you have nic nat being a late out, Ryder seems the way to go.

Probably going to be a popular move for those not wanting to drop 100+ pts courtesy of a Nic Nat doughnut.
Buddy has lost a lot of coin and without cash in the bank Ryder with the DPP ruck rookie option looks sound.

Or Sinclair. If Nic Nat misses more than 1, he certainly won't be dropped, and is in better form than Ryder IMO. With out goals Ryder had struggled this year, like Port.
These are my options too, although trading Buckley out and swinging McGovern back to achieve it.
Other option is trade Nic Nat to Martin. Decisions...

Disagree on Sinclair.  Not sure on your logic about him retaining his position. (its not ideal ruck cover when your cover will only play if one particular ruck is out) Ryder is a better option. Yes, Ryder/Port's form hasn't been great but you can't say that Ryder has been crap but got a few goals.  The reality is he plays fwd and kicks a few goals. That's where he gets points. Ryder will average around 80 for the rest of the year IMO.  That's good cover.

Sinclair has been the number 2 ruck the last few months, Lycett will go out before him. Sinclair has outscored Nic Nat the past 2 weeks and is playing really well (not just scoring well in SC). With this option you are guaranteed one of Nic Nat or Sinclair will play. That's my logic, not saying it's perfect but I think it's pretty sound. Sinclair also had a BE of 5 or something like that.

Ah sorry, my bad. Was thinking Lycett.  Yeah, you're right, he's pretty solid and certainly has been doing well of late.  He's not a R/F though, is he?  I think the fact you can swing Ryder fwd if needed gives him a bit more edge

All good.

Yep, he sure is. And about $50k cheaper with more Sunday games coming up later in the year.

looks pretty good on paper. great POD too. You've done your research ;)

Oh no...

Unlucky mate.  :(

It was either laugh or throw my phone from the stands onto the gabba at 3/4 time... Decided I wanted to keep my phone. But I guess that's why u save trades for finals when playing for league victory, regardless of the carnage throughout the year. Made a kick to kick decision to trade him back out for griffin. At least that made me some money and hopefully will see me get over the line and into the prelim, effectively saving me needing to trade next week. McGovern injury better just be cramp, but I think that's wishful thinking...

[PICCOLLO]

Rough mate.  First time I've heard of someone trading in someone and trading them out in the same week.  All you can do is laugh.