Trade Talk

Started by Nige, August 01, 2015, 02:01:21 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Pkbaldy

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on September 08, 2015, 06:18:35 PM
defending the Heeney trade a little

i was offering JJK and one of Atley/Seedsman/Hombsch

which is nearly the same value kinda

That you did mate. Was tempting too  :P

powersuperkents

Quote from: Pkbaldy on September 08, 2015, 06:28:54 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on September 08, 2015, 06:18:35 PM
defending the Heeney trade a little

i was offering JJK and one of Atley/Seedsman/Hombsch

which is nearly the same value kinda

That you did mate. Was tempting too  :P
You're comparing JJK to one of best players in the competition (There are 22 players to choose from and they all lineup in the same team every week)

Football Factory

#77
Who's this 1 of the best players in the comp ?

Boak averages 98 seems pretty far off one of the best in the comp.

He's an old looking 27 imo aswell (28 next year)

I don't rate or need Daniher either.

If people have a problem with one of the bottom teams getting some overs for a player that will be an absolute gun in the future then im surprised. If i was trading to the Grizzlies or something i could understand.

If people have a problem with it then i suggest they contact Jukes, just want to know whats going on, really don't care.






Pkbaldy

Quote from: FOOTBALL FACTORY on September 08, 2015, 07:22:57 PM
Who's this 1 of the best players in the comp ?

Boak averages 98 seems pretty far off one of the best in the comp.

He's an old looking 27 imo aswell (28 next year)

I don't rate or need Daniher either.

If people have a problem with one of the bottom teams getting some overs for a player that will be an absolute gun in the future then im surprised. If i was trading to the Grizzlies or something i could understand.

If people have a problem with it then i suggest they contact Jukes, just want to know whats going on, really don't care.

Well to be honest it's a risky trade for us both. Heeney has the potential to be a 100+ in the next 2 years and if he stays as a forward that's even worse for me... Boak will always stay a 95-100 for the next 5 years that he's fantasy relevant. And Daniher can either be one of the better forwards of the comp, or a lump of shower...

powersuperkents

#79
Quote from: FOOTBALL FACTORY on September 08, 2015, 07:22:57 PM
Who's this 1 of the best players in the comp ?

Boak averages 98 seems pretty far off one of the best in the comp.

He's an old looking 27 imo aswell (28 next year)

I don't rate or need Daniher either.

If people have a problem with one of the bottom teams getting some overs for a player that will be an absolute gun in the future then im surprised. If i was trading to the Grizzlies or something i could understand.

If people have a problem with it then i suggest they contact Jukes, just want to know whats going on, really don't care.
I think it was a fair trade. I think you have misinterpreted the context of my post.

I was not referring to fantasy football at all. I was referring to real AFL and making a witty jest about Port Adelaide (the team I support).

I can see the mix up. I literally see no problem with the trade and I didn't think anyone had any objections (honestly one of the more even trades this period).

Again, my comment was merely a joke as a Port supporter embellishing the talents of the players in my team. I usually say "who do you think will win the Brownlow? There are 22 players to choose from..." (again referring to the Port Adelaide lineup) :P

Personally, I don't believe that there should be interventions in regards to trades. I think it undermines the intentions and strategies of coaches, and impugns their competence. 

Jukes has processed the trade mate, so this isn't an issue anyway

Football Factory

Yeah big mix up there  :-[  sorry mate  :)

kilbluff1985

meh this is the best part of trade season #banter

Football Factory

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on September 08, 2015, 09:28:19 PM
meh this is the best part of trade season #banter

Fair bit was generated with this trade  :-X

T Dog

Zorko + Hawkins (or) Petrie avail in a package for 2 youngish starting mids.
Can negotiate sweetener for right players.

Pkbaldy

Chucking Clinton Young + Brayden Maynard + Danyle Pearce in as a package deal for either 1 player, or 1 NAT or RK pick.
Get on it.

Jukes

Looking to package together a few of pick 26, Duffield, Harwood, Howlett, Towers, Simpkin, Matt Shaw, Cordy, Matt Thomas, Monfries, Smedts, Nick Smith, Warnock, Tutt, Ceglar, Jake Kelly, and Zac Williams for a gun that isn't a mid

Pm if interested

Jukes

Quote from: Jukes on September 14, 2015, 09:02:21 PM
Looking to package together a few of Duffield, Harwood, Simpkin, Matt Shaw, Cordy, Matt Thomas, Monfries, Smedts, Nick Smith, Warnock, Tutt, Ceglar, Jake Kelly, and Zac Williams for a gun that isn't a mid

Pm if interested

Updated

T Dog

Looking for a Rd1 RD pick.

Have a fleet of depth players and late draft picks. Take any ones you like.

Jamie Bennell (D); Simon White (D/F); Tom Derickx (R); Nathan VanBerlo (M); Adam Goodes (F); Matthew Wright (M/F);
Brodie Martin.(F/M) ND #43, #46, #49 and RD #32

powersuperkents

Anyone want to take a chance on Mark Jamar?

He might be picked up by another club. Going for next to nothing (basically a 3rd round NAT pick)

kilbluff1985

damn it Z Smith what are you doing to me i like having GC rucks