VC Loophole Score

Chelskiman · June 26, 2015, 12:13:43 PM

I put the VC on Swan who ended up with 110. I was going to put it on Fyfe, who also got 110 anyway. 110 is a decent score for a captain, but it's at that awkward place where you just know someone else is going to beat it. So should I keep Swan's 110 or chase a bigger score?

My other captain options are T. Mitchell, Parker, Hodge or Martin.

timmyparso · June 26, 2015, 12:48:29 PM

Take swans score

I too have Swan as vc but also have Jack Steven and I'm a greedy barbie so I'm passing on Swan hoping for bigger score

Rusty00 · June 26, 2015, 12:55:44 PM

I've got the same decision. It's really in that awkward range where you'd be annoyed if you didn't take it and your Captain had a stinker but also be annoyed if you took the 110 but then your options came out and smashed a 130+.

I'm probably the same as timmy, I'm greedy for a bigger score ;)

Chelskiman · June 26, 2015, 01:35:59 PM

Yeah, it's tough, but I think I'll take Swan's score. I'm just scared someone like Parker will pump out another 160 or something insane like that.

colmullet · June 26, 2015, 05:14:12 PM

I'm taking Swans score in AF....but had the VC on Pendles in RDT and im still considering taking 101 lol

Mat0369 · June 26, 2015, 05:20:15 PM

I had Pendles. I going with one of Steven or Armo.

I would bank the 110 in your case though

henry · June 26, 2015, 05:57:42 PM

Quote from: Rusty00 on June 26, 2015, 12:55:44 PM
I've got the same decision. It's really in that awkward range where you'd be annoyed if you didn't take it and your Captain had a stinker but also be annoyed if you took the 110 but then your options came out and smashed a 130+.

I'm probably the same as timmy, I'm greedy for a bigger score ;)

I'd be more annoyed with the captain having a stinker than getting 140 and not choosing him. I'm certainly taking Swan's 110.

Chelskiman · June 26, 2015, 11:07:47 PM

No damage done really. I would have put the C on Parker had I not taken Swan's VC, and he ended up on 112, so I missed out on 4 points.

timmyparso · June 27, 2015, 08:23:21 AM

Quote from: Chelskiman on June 26, 2015, 11:07:47 PM
No damage done really. I would have put the C on Parker had I not taken Swan's VC, and he ended up on 112, so I missed out on 4 points.

2 points

swan (c) + parker = 110Ã—2 + 112 = 332

Parker (c) + swan = 112Ã—2 + 110 = 334

Chelskiman · June 27, 2015, 01:06:45 PM

Quote from: timmyparso on June 27, 2015, 08:23:21 AM
Quote from: Chelskiman on June 26, 2015, 11:07:47 PM
No damage done really. I would have put the C on Parker had I not taken Swan's VC, and he ended up on 112, so I missed out on 4 points.

2 points

swan (c) + parker = 110Ã—2 + 112 = 332

Parker (c) + swan = 112Ã—2 + 110 = 334

True, I just meat straight up captain scores though. 220 for Swan and 224 for Parker. Either way, I didn't miss out on much.