Americas SC banter/discussion thread

[powersuperkents]

Also, if it helps, Santiago will not be involved in the rookie draft for a 2nd consecutive season - so you need not worry about my picks when publishing the rookie draft order  :)

[T Dog]

Colorado will use:

ND # 3 and #17
RD # 8, #11, #13, #20

[Nige]

I've got 22 and 23 as well as 14 and 40.

Edit: Will be using them plus however many I need to fill my list, I think I need like two extra?

[Football Factory]

Houston will be using

Nat: 9,19,25,35,47

Rook: 9,19?

[kilbluff1985]

Daniel Hannebery
Patrick Dangerfield
Dyson Heppell
Travis Boak
David Swallow
Levi Greenwood
Harley Bennell
Zach Merrett
Toby Greene
Devon Smith
Josh J. Kennedy
Dane Swan
Michael Hurley
Grant Birchall
Michael Hibberd
Brodie Smith
Aaron Vandenberg
Cam Ellis-Yolmen
Tom Bell
Will Langford
Tom Nicholls
Keegan Brooksby
Kayne Turner
Ben Jacobs
Paul Seedsman
Trav Colyer
Jack Hombsch
Sam Butler
Jackson Merrett
Jonathan Freeman
Jesse White
Brandon Jack
Mason Wood
Riley Knight
Billy Stretch
Caleb Daniel
Nathan Drummond
Matthew Goodyear
Liam dawson
Conor McKenna

Jukes can i get my list changed to this just cause it's order the way i like it

and funny we have one of the best lists but also the shortest lol

[powersuperkents]

I've got 22 and 23 as well as 14 and 40.

Edit: Will be using them plus however many I need to fill my list, I think I need like two extra?

Okay now I'm confused

I don't think the picks were updated and some trades may have went unregistered - because looking at the trading list pick 23 was only traded once from FF to Nige, and somehow it was registered under Boston (who have traded it to me)  :-\

Flowering hell, this is the Taylor Adams incident all over again (it was an insignificant trade but getting up the draft order meant a lot to me)

The pick is rightfully Nige's

[powersuperkents]

This is really confusing

I've traced pick 22 down to Quito

But suddenly there was this trade;

"32. Ottawa trade: Tom Lamb and Pick 28
Boston trade: Ben Kennedy and Pick 22"

Yet I cannot find any record of Quito trading pick 22 to Boston and the pick is still registered to Quito (we really need to specific what draft)

Looking at the trade thread, this was RD 22. Meaning that NAT 22 still belongs to Quito

"Ottawa Gives: N28 + Tom Lamb
Boston Gives: Ben Kennedy + R22"

So that clarifies both NAT 22 & 23 (the former is Quito's, the latter is Ottawa's).

Hopefully we can get this all sorted by the 28th, but I would suggest when tracking picks to look at the thread rather than the first page summary so we can distinguish what draft the picks are from

[Jukes]

I'll start my investigation, watch this space

Alright so I think I've fixed things up, it just makes the most recent Wright trade invalid as Boston traded pick 23 which does not belong to them.

I've given pick 34 back to Santiago until they and Boston can fix the trade using eligible picks.

I think I've done it right, at least.

[Nige]

Nah, I definitely wouldn't have made that trade if it wasn't a nat pick.

[powersuperkents]

I'll start my investigation, watch this space

Alright so I think I've fixed things up, it just makes the most recent Wright trade invalid as Boston traded pick 23 which does not belong to them.

I've given pick 34 back to Santiago until they and Boston can fix the trade using eligible picks.

I think I've done it right, at least.

I'm talking to Ele now

The fact you have held back the draft until the 28th was a solid idea - otherwise, this would have been quite a hassle  :)

[Nige]

Do I or do or not have 22 anymore?

There was some investigation and idk if we got a result from that.

The draft thread says Quito have it and now I'm sad because I was looking forward to back to back picks.

[powersuperkents]

Do I or do or not have 22 anymore?

There was some investigation and idk if we got a result from that.

The draft thread says Quito have it and now I'm sad because I was looking forward to back to back picks.

It was Rookie Draft 22 - that is the pick you confirmed acceptance to, look at the submission and confirmation on the trade thread  :-\

There must have been a miscommunication between you and Ele, however Ele could not have possibly given you NAT22 because he never had it

I know it's hard to deal with because you were obviously under the impression that Ele offered NAT#22, but it's always wise to check what was submitted  :-\

You could probably complain if your correspondence with Ele expressly stated "NAT 22" but if the trade is invalidated it would be unjust to KB who Ele on traded NAT 28 to. I guess it's best to live and learn and from check the trade that was submitted before confirming it  :-\ It would also punish KB, when you accepted a legitimate trade (no one else can really receive blame but you, because Ele did post a valid trade and you may have misread it)

Sorry mate, it sucks - trust me, I know. But RD 22 is specifically what was listed on the trade and you did confirm it  :-\ and imagine how ridiculous it would be if we gave you NAT 22 and stripped Memph of his pick for no good reason

[Nige]

So I checked my PMs, it was R22 haha.

Meh, that works too.  :P

[powersuperkents]

So I checked my PMs, it was R22 haha.

Meh, that works too.  :P

Too easy mate  :)

Yeah T. Lamb + N28 for Bennedy + R22 seems even

and Bennedy will be better than any player at NAT #22 imo since his move to the Demons

[kilbluff1985]

so proud of Nige he had a #kbmoment