NFL Fantasy League 2015-16

[Mat0369]

Hey, that's almost as much as I am going to beat you by this week.

[plumdog millionaire]

You really need to work on your trash talk :P

I beat you by 29 points last week.



Better?

Sorry but I don't converse with team's lower than me on the ladder. It doesn't take much to beat a reserves team. :)

I shouldn't be talking to any of you guys then  :))))))))))

[Jay]

You really need to work on your trash talk :P

I beat you by 29 points last week.



Better?

Sorry but I don't converse with team's lower than me on the ladder. It doesn't take much to beat a reserves team. :)

I shouldn't be talking to any of you guys then  :))))))))))

Haha you're allowed to talk trash given your team is stacked. But PBs below-average lineup is getting far too much attention around here. :P

[plumdog millionaire]

You really need to work on your trash talk :P

I beat you by 29 points last week.



Better?

Sorry but I don't converse with team's lower than me on the ladder. It doesn't take much to beat a reserves team. :)

I shouldn't be talking to any of you guys then  :))))))))))

Haha you're allowed to talk trash given your team is stacked. But PBs below-average lineup is getting far too much attention around here. :P

The one that rolled with Mike Vick and Kap for a bunch of weeks?

[Jay]

You really need to work on your trash talk :P

I beat you by 29 points last week.



Better?

Sorry but I don't converse with team's lower than me on the ladder. It doesn't take much to beat a reserves team. :)

I shouldn't be talking to any of you guys then  :))))))))))

Haha you're allowed to talk trash given your team is stacked. But PBs below-average lineup is getting far too much attention around here. :P

The one that rolled with Mike Vick and Kap for a bunch of weeks?

And I still couldn't win  :-[

[Holz]

who was losing in the trade that got vetoed?

i dont know if i should add more or less?

[Mat0369]

It hasn't officially been vetoed yet. Someone flipped their vote from no to yes so it is under the 4 it was earlier which would have seen it vetoed.

[RiOtChEsS]

who was losing in the trade that got vetoed?

i dont know if i should add more or less?

kind of odd u say "well gronk a big no. He is in the top 5 in the comp in value" and this the trade u make ???

[plumdog millionaire]

Are people just going to veto every trade that goes through?

[PowerBug]

You really need to work on your trash talk :P

I beat you by 29 points last week.



Better?

Sorry but I don't converse with team's lower than me on the ladder. It doesn't take much to beat a reserves team. :)

I shouldn't be talking to any of you guys then  :))))))))))

Haha you're allowed to talk trash given your team is stacked. But PBs below-average lineup is getting far too much attention around here. :P

The one that rolled with Mike Vick and Kap for a bunch of weeks?

Yes. Vick twice, Kaep once so far and again this week. I'm 2-1 with those two as QBs, the one i lost was when Seattle got lucky with the ref calling something wrong and then Wilson throwing a bomb straight after. I lost to Holz by 1.4.

So you might say I'm doing better without Roethlisberger.

[Holz]

who was losing in the trade that got vetoed?

i dont know if i should add more or less?

kind of odd u say "well gronk a big no. He is in the top 5 in the comp in value" and this the trade u make ???

he is top 5 in the comp in value, he is actually rated tied first with Bell, Jones and Hopkins


but Gurley is ranked the 6th best RB and Gates is ranked the 4th best TE

Gurley the last two weeks has had 49 carries for 305 yards and 34 points. He has looked real good and there is no reason they shouldnt keep handing him the ball. Dont like to look at projections too much but Yates has him top 5 RB this week and he is projected to go 19.4

Gates is old yes but he has got 13 targets a game in his first two back and Rivers is leading the league in passing attempts and Rivers clearly liking him as an option the downgrade in Gronk to Gates to my team is smaller than the gap in flex and Gurley.
Again dont want to look at projections too much but a solid 13.

[plumdog millionaire]

You really need to work on your trash talk :P

I beat you by 29 points last week.



Better?

Sorry but I don't converse with team's lower than me on the ladder. It doesn't take much to beat a reserves team. :)

I shouldn't be talking to any of you guys then  :))))))))))

Haha you're allowed to talk trash given your team is stacked. But PBs below-average lineup is getting far too much attention around here. :P

The one that rolled with Mike Vick and Kap for a bunch of weeks?

Yes. Vick twice, Kaep once so far and again this week. I'm 2-1 with those two as QBs, the one i lost was when Seattle got lucky with the ref calling something wrong and then Wilson throwing a bomb straight after. I lost to Holz by 1.4.

So you might say I'm doing better without Roethlisberger.

You're 2-1 without him and 1-2 with him so yes you are doing better
Maybe you should trade him :)

[plumdog millionaire]

who was losing in the trade that got vetoed?

i dont know if i should add more or less?

kind of odd u say "well gronk a big no. He is in the top 5 in the comp in value" and this the trade u make ???

he is top 5 in the comp in value, he is actually rated tied first with Bell, Jones and Hopkins


but Gurley is ranked the 6th best RB and Gates is ranked the 4th best TE

Gurley the last two weeks has had 49 carries for 305 yards and 34 points. He has looked real good and there is no reason they shouldnt keep handing him the ball. Dont like to look at projections too much but Yates has him top 5 RB this week and he is projected to go 19.4

Gates is old yes but he has got 13 targets a game in his first two back and Rivers is leading the league in passing attempts and Rivers clearly liking him as an option the downgrade in Gronk to Gates to my team is smaller than the gap in flex and Gurley.
Again dont want to look at projections too much but a solid 13.

Would have been a decent trade if you didn't give up Hillman and got one more solid player back to really help you reload

[Jay]

Imo there should be no veto system, and just let Mat reject the obviously terrible trades. People vote depending on their own situation, which isn't how it's supposed to work.

[RiOtChEsS]

who was losing in the trade that got vetoed?

i dont know if i should add more or less?

kind of odd u say "well gronk a big no. He is in the top 5 in the comp in value" and this the trade u make ???

he is top 5 in the comp in value, he is actually rated tied first with Bell, Jones and Hopkins


but Gurley is ranked the 6th best RB and Gates is ranked the 4th best TE

Gurley the last two weeks has had 49 carries for 305 yards and 34 points. He has looked real good and there is no reason they shouldnt keep handing him the ball. Dont like to look at projections too much but Yates has him top 5 RB this week and he is projected to go 19.4

Gates is old yes but he has got 13 targets a game in his first two back and Rivers is leading the league in passing attempts and Rivers clearly liking him as an option the downgrade in Gronk to Gates to my team is smaller than the gap in flex and Gurley.
Again dont want to look at projections too much but a solid 13.

in a 6 week sample size ;D