NFL Fantasy League 2015-16

[Jay]

Got Kaepernick. Pretty happy there :)

Sarcasm?

Nup, experts say he's one to field this week :o

So I will trust experts on this one. ;)

Dropping Mike Vick and getting worse is tough to do, but kudos for pulling it off :P

[Mat0369]

I was looking at Snead and knew I wouldn't get him with my position. He and West were both out of my range but I don't really trust that backfield situation now with West, Davis and Thomas all getting touches. It will be a true RBBC.

PB while the Ravens secondary sucks, Krapernick sucks more.

[PowerBug]

Got Kaepernick. Pretty happy there :)

Sarcasm?

Nup, experts say he's one to field this week :o

So I will trust experts on this one. ;)

Dropping Mike Vick and getting worse is tough to do, but kudos for pulling it off :P

We'll see if you say that again on Monday :)

[Jay]

Got Kaepernick. Pretty happy there :)

Sarcasm?

Nup, experts say he's one to field this week :o

So I will trust experts on this one. ;)

Dropping Mike Vick and getting worse is tough to do, but kudos for pulling it off :P

We'll see if you say that again on Monday :)

One game won't change my mind. The dude is cooked, looks like a completely different player than the one who went to the SB.

[plumdog millionaire]

Kap looked like his old self in the second half of that Giants game, that's not enough to come to a conclusion about him but I wouldn't completely write him off yet.

[Holz]

got two planned big trades to have a new look squad.

no real flex anymore so working the wire pretty hard.

surely one of West Hillman Hankerson Matthew can come good.

[plumdog millionaire]

From my knowledge there will be a few big trades this week, could really make or break a team's season

[Holz]

thought this might be interesting.

you can find the values of each player as of today. Will start going through a few lineups. Note this is just current best lineup

Matt Barkley Express 132
Jay Top/ Holz Bot 112
Riotchess 121
DCG 162 - this team is insane

[Mat0369]

Trades will only be pushed through if they involve Thursday games. Sunday games will go through the normal veto process guys.

[plumdog millionaire]

Smart. No dramas

[PowerBug]

Trade clearly is not even ;)

[Mat0369]

Smart. No dramas

The reason for this is because by the times rosters open and a trade can be brokered it is usually a Thursday, sometimes you make these trades with the intentions of having a Thursday player on your roster to fill a need (Charles out for the season, trade for Ingram for example). There is still a veto period with these in the thread, so if there are enough objections I will block it otherwise it will pass.

In regards to trades involving Sunday players, there is no reason for them to get pushed through early when they are made on a Thursday. The guys will be on your roster by Sunday so you can still set rosters. This allows it to go through the normal veto process and protocols. Due to the time difference, if a trade is brokered and agreed upon by a Saturday, I will open up vetos in the thread and push it through by Sunday evening. I don't want to run the risk that trades go through while the majority of us are asleep leaving blank roster spots on the field.

So here is the clear explanation for anyone that asks in the future.

[Mat0369]

And I notice we have a trade, go and vote on it guys. I probably wouldn't have made the trade but I don't think it is that flat out awful that I would veto it.

[plumdog millionaire]

I think the reason me along with a couple of others wanted to push trades early was because they are imbalanced trades (2 for 1, 3 for 2) etc. and don't want to wait until Sunday to fill up the roster spot and risk losing guys on the ww just because a trade won't go through until Sunday even though no one else has a problem with it.

[Mat0369]

If you're making 2 for 1 offers that's the risk you have to take.