Wines vs Ward vs Ebert

[steven3]

Hey guys
Need a round 13 mid so choosing out of these 3. Leaning towards wines or ward but am not sure on who as ebert is also an option.
Just a quick vote
Any feedback or other suggestions would be appreciated
Thanks

[Blues Blues Blues]

I voted Ward, but wondering if his 175 is influencing me. He has posted 3 scores in the '80s and a 99 with everything up in the 100s incl 3 above 130.

Wines has 5 of his 6 over 100, incl 3 over 120. His one sub 100 score was 76 when he got injured.

Ebert 3 scores under 100 (incl a 99), with 4 of the 7 100s over 130.

All 3 have low BEs.

This is a very interesting comparison and I've now confused myself.

I was going to grab Ward but now it doesn't seem so clear cut. I still prob have them rated Ward>Wines>Ebert but it's close

[sammy123]

Ward mate

[LordSneeze]

Ward has the history behind him. The others dont.

[HotTiges]

Got Wines last week
and getting rid of Gruff for Ward..feel happy or a change
dont discount Ebert but im just worried about his low cieling

[Grufflez]

I voted Ebert because I DO NOT CONFORM!  ???

[jfitty]

I'll keep a close eye on this one, been choosing between those 3 and Selwood for 2 midfield spots.

Right now it's Ward and Selwood, but it's changed a million times over the last few days.

[Blues Blues Blues]

I'll keep a close eye on this one, been choosing between those 3 and Selwood for 2 midfield spots.

Right now it's Ward and Selwood, but it's changed a million times over the last few days.

I'm grabbing Ward for Vandenberg this week.

Will watch Jelwood, Wines and Ebert closely this week to see who comes in over next few weeks

[Gandalf123]

Get on Ebert, risk vs reward!!

[barlowlove]

I have Ward, but I'd rather have Wines

So Ollie

[steven3]

All three seem good options when i see what you guys have written haha

I know ward has the history but he has looked a bit off this year until his last game of 175 but im wondering if he is getting back to his best form. Could the other gws midfielders be impacting him? To me he has the highest ceiling of the three.

Wines looks to be most consitent with every full game played above 100. Never gets the tag as it always goes to boak and gray but can he keep up 110+. Last year averaged just on 100 as a second year player and is this extra 10 points per game jump just him developing?

Ebert looks like ward having up and down weeks. Has run into hot form the last 3 weeks and like wines never gets tagged. In the past 3 years he has averaged 100, 97 and 94. What has changed this year to allow him to be up at 111? Is it just a result of the last few weeks and he is likely to go back to a 100-105 when his form cools down.

[Ringo]

Ebert is performing like he did last year and unless you had from the start you got burned.  He will through in some low scores which will hurt you.

So toss up between Wines and Ward for me.

[steven3]

Ebert is performing like he did last year and unless you had from the start you got burned.  He will through in some low scores which will hurt you.

So toss up between Wines and Ward for me.

Just looked at ebert's full year last year. Started off the first 13 rounds great but the second half of the year was terrible. Could it happen again this year? Im not willing to take the risk now.
Cheers mate

[TheMoops]

Not sure if this has been mentioned on these forums before, but check GWS's SC finals draw. Smashes the port boys hands down if you're going for league

[HotTiges]

hey lads..

do I look at Shiel as I can then do Clark to Motlop or go Ward and keep Clark and deal with him later??