Main Menu

Dumont

Started by bwsh, May 31, 2015, 07:48:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: YoungGun on June 02, 2015, 02:42:59 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on June 02, 2015, 02:34:47 PM
All this talk about how good the rd13 bye is

It's brutal for me  :'(

you must be flying in rnd 12 then RD?

Not really man. Still got Fyfe, Pendles, JPK, Goddard and Swan as rd12 prem's, but rd13 is Goldy, NicNat, Gray, Shiel, Jelwood, Shaw, TMac, Lumumba plus rookies too  :-[

Holz

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on June 02, 2015, 04:49:44 PM
Quote from: YoungGun on June 02, 2015, 02:42:59 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on June 02, 2015, 02:34:47 PM
All this talk about how good the rd13 bye is

It's brutal for me  :'(

you must be flying in rnd 12 then RD?

Not really man. Still got Fyfe, Pendles, JPK, Goddard and Swan as rd12 prem's, but rd13 is Goldy, NicNat, Gray, Shiel, Jelwood, Shaw, TMac, Lumumba plus rookies too  :-[

You trade your rookies though to even other rookies or premiums during the byes. Round 13 should be the easiest round by far.

Grufflez

If Swallow comes back in does this affect Dumont? anyone heard/read anything indicating him getting more runs without the sub vest? Coach comments, radio comments from teammates...anything, at 153k he would want to be a bloody good chance to play in the next 3 games minimum for bye cover.

plumdog millionaire

I reckon that they have heaps of players they'd drop before Dumont afer the performance they put up, especially considering Brad Scott's comments after the game

Ricochet

Gibson, Bastinac and Atley should all get dropped before Dumont

Grufflez

Cheers fellas, helps put my mind at ease.

Capper

Quote from: Ricochet on June 04, 2015, 02:53:17 PM
Gibson, Bastinac and Atley should all get dropped before Dumont
they should but will they?? Norf have been saying that they will be dropping players not performing for a while and haven't.

Will the new coach??

bottlemart

Quote from: Ricochet on June 04, 2015, 02:53:17 PM
Gibson, Bastinac and Atley should all get dropped before Dumont
Yep Gibson has been turning the ball over for too long.  After a disgusting 3rd quarter effort, we finally got back in front with 4 goals, only for Gibson to kick the ball blindly out on the full.  With Gibson getting the ball it was only a matter of time before we gave it back to the opposition and lost the game.

Dumont was one of the very few positives for North on Sunday.

Jimmykidd

can see him being sub this week. not good.

Mr.Craig

Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 04, 2015, 07:34:05 PM
can see him being sub this week. not good.

That's what I thought last week.

Jezza249

im stuck unsure which one to grab dumont or boston

Big Mac

Quote from: Jezza249 on June 04, 2015, 07:42:14 PM
im stuck unsure which one to grab dumont or boston

Dumont has a chance at playing in round 12

Boston has none


colmullet

Quote from: Jezza249 on June 04, 2015, 07:42:14 PM
im stuck unsure which one to grab dumont or boston

Dumont on the bubble, Boston not

Jimmykidd

now the question is, who to trade out for him?

was thinking miller originally, but ive got no bench cover in mids now due to teams..

Gigantor

Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 04, 2015, 07:50:56 PM
now the question is, who to trade out for him?

was thinking miller originally, but ive got no bench cover in mids now due to teams..
+1