Main Menu

Biggs

Started by Raiden, May 25, 2015, 09:31:05 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

H1bb3i2d

Only have 2 guys with the early bye in my midfield so there's definitely room for 1 more! What you lose in $80k in cash you'd think you'd make up for in having nice scoring cover?

Also, what role does he have? Is it still that half-back type position from the off-season?

Capper

Quote from: Big  Mac on May 25, 2015, 03:43:23 PM
Quote from: Capper on May 25, 2015, 01:45:14 PM
I think Macrae comes in for Dale though

Didn't Goodes injure himself?
Yeah he did. Injuries could be the Dogs undoing. Liba, Smith and Goodes gone for the season

Bully

Quote from: Big  Mac on May 25, 2015, 03:43:23 PM
Quote from: Capper on May 25, 2015, 01:45:14 PM
I think Macrae comes in for Dale though

Didn't Goodes injure himself?

I will almost certainly trade him in if he holds his place, Goodes to Biggs plus some spare cash (swinging DMac back).

AaronKirk

Personally I will consider him if he has a big scoring game this week.

I have 8 premo mids so going Cripps to Biggs next week could be an option.

Grufflez

Only consider if if pulls a 110+ out of the bag which would guarantee some decent cash generation in the short term and mean that he had a good game helping short term JS.

200k+ rookies are a waste of cash 9 out of 10 times.

Bully

Quote from: Grufflez on May 26, 2015, 01:21:06 PM
Only consider if if pulls a 110+ out of the bag which would guarantee some decent cash generation in the short term and mean that he had a good game helping short term JS.

200k+ rookies are a waste of cash 9 out of 10 times.

Problem is we are running out of mid rookies, Blakely maybe but JS very poor. Gore maybe but JS doubtful. Neal-Bullen no preseason. Menadue major vest candidate. Jed Anderson in and out like Johnny Holmes.

Biggs looks like a decent option.

sammy123

Quote from: Bully on May 26, 2015, 01:33:26 PM
Quote from: Grufflez on May 26, 2015, 01:21:06 PM
Only consider if if pulls a 110+ out of the bag which would guarantee some decent cash generation in the short term and mean that he had a good game helping short term JS.

200k+ rookies are a waste of cash 9 out of 10 times.

Problem is we are running out of mid rookies, Blakely maybe but JS very poor. Gore maybe but JS doubtful. Neal-Bullen no preseason. Menadue major vest candidate. Jed Anderson in and out like Johnny Holmes.

Biggs looks like a decent option.

Annoying thing is. I thought jed anderson played well against GWS then got dropped. And has been playing well in reserves.

Mustn't be doing enough for clarkson

Bully

Quote from: sammy123 on May 26, 2015, 01:38:47 PM
Quote from: Bully on May 26, 2015, 01:33:26 PM
Quote from: Grufflez on May 26, 2015, 01:21:06 PM
Only consider if if pulls a 110+ out of the bag which would guarantee some decent cash generation in the short term and mean that he had a good game helping short term JS.

200k+ rookies are a waste of cash 9 out of 10 times.

Problem is we are running out of mid rookies, Blakely maybe but JS very poor. Gore maybe but JS doubtful. Neal-Bullen no preseason. Menadue major vest candidate. Jed Anderson in and out like Johnny Holmes.

Biggs looks like a decent option.

Annoying thing is. I thought jed anderson played well against GWS then got dropped. And has been playing well in reserves.

Mustn't be doing enough for clarkson

Problem for Jed is they have many players like him, Hartung probably preferred given he's one of the fittest at the club. Hill & Smith are regulars so no hope there.

H1bb3i2d

Quote from: Grufflez on May 26, 2015, 01:21:06 PM
Only consider if if pulls a 110+ out of the bag which would guarantee some decent cash generation in the short term and mean that he had a good game helping short term JS.

200k+ rookies are a waste of cash 9 out of 10 times.

I wouldn't even care about his cash generation. As long as he allows me to get some downgrade money and plays when I need him to (round 12 and 13!)

Chrispy75

Want him to have modest scores the next two weeks as I will probably downgrade to him after rnd 11 bye (3 games).

Grufflez

Kane Lambert listed as R11 return, will probably need a game or 2 in the seconds first though you would think.

Big Mac

Quote from: Chrispy75 on May 26, 2015, 05:58:07 PM
Want him to have modest scores the next two weeks as I will probably downgrade to him after rnd 11 bye (3 games).

2 modest games in a row and he'd be dropped for sure. Probably dropped after 1

Chrispy75

Quote from: Big  Mac on May 26, 2015, 08:18:20 PM
Quote from: Chrispy75 on May 26, 2015, 05:58:07 PM
Want him to have modest scores the next two weeks as I will probably downgrade to him after rnd 11 bye (3 games).

2 modest games in a row and he'd be dropped for sure. Probably dropped after 1

I'm fine with him averaging 70.  But the fact he is a rnd 11 player makes him an ideal downgrade in rnd 12.  Pity he will have played 3 games at that time, but I would still consider him at 240k.

RaisyDaisy

Cant pick him this week, but if he goes well this week and plays the following week then Miller to Biggs is a chance for me

enzedder

Quote from: Gigantor on May 25, 2015, 10:21:21 AM
Will keep an eye on him, would be a good trade for Cripps/cye that won't ruin my bye structure
Exactly the same for me.