Beams

[Marstar]

His influence was already factored in at the end of the 3rd quarter for 86 SC off 72 DT. 

After getting that 1 (and only) possy in the first minute of the 4th quarter his SC was 92. Every few minutes after that his SC score continued to rise one point at a time until it reach 104. 

Brisbane were not winning the quarter. No amount of early influence was carrying his team over into the fourth quarter. 

Normally SC influence continues for a player who set the tone for his team even if he's subbed off or goes off injured ... not when he goes missing for a quarter in a losing team.

[batt]

The game was dead.  He was just getting more of the 3300 pie for his work in the first 3 quarters. 

[GoLions]

His influence was already factored in at the end of the 3rd quarter for 86 SC off 72 DT. 

After getting that 1 (and only) possy in the first minute of the 4th quarter his SC was 92. Every few minutes after that his SC score continued to rise one point at a time until it reach 104. 

Brisbane were not winning the quarter. No amount of early influence was carrying his team over into the fourth quarter. 

Normally SC influence continues for a player who set the tone for his team even if he's subbed off or goes off injured ... not when he goes missing for a quarter in a losing team.

Every minute that the game went on in the last quarter, his work in the first 3 was scaled as even more influential. At the end of the game, his actual 3QT score would've been around mid 90s.
And as I said before, without having seen the last quarter, if Beams got a hard or loose-ball-get and got tackled (without being given HTB), that would get him points in SC as well.