DT Who to Field

[Ricochet]

Cripps vs Miller?

Cripps

Belly vs Kraks?

[Mat0369]

Bellcho. There is a chance Krak is the sub, not so much with Bellcho.

[Rusty00]

Bellcho. There is a chance Krak is the sub, not so much with Bellcho.

yep, Bellcho for me as well

[Ricochet]

Bellcho. There is a chance Krak is the sub, not so much with Bellcho.

yep, Bellcho for me as well

Yeh leaning that way also, cheers boys

[Rusty00]

Clark or Krak?

[Mat0369]

I think I would go with Clark for similar reasoning. He should also pick up a few touches in the ruck and might snag a couple playing on Schofield or Hurn

[Ringo]

Little different Cripps or CEY and Clark or Tarrant. Leaning towards Cripps and Clark.

[Chelskiman]

Clarke or Bellchambers or Tarrant?

CEY or Miller?

[Mat0369]

Little different Cripps or CEY and Clark or Tarrant. Leaning towards Cripps and Clark.

I am expecting Cripps to get a bit of the pill so Cripps for the first

I am looking at dumping Taz for cash this week but I think he will score decently against the Pies. I expect North to win so I think they will be able to maintain possession while I expect the Cats to lose so Clark might see less of the ball. I don't mind Clark for SC this week because I think his SC score will be higher then his DT.

So simply put, Cripps and Taz

Clarke or Bellchambers or Tarrant?

CEY or Miller?

I would probably go CEY but it is tough to split the first group. Maybe 70 odd for both Taz and Bellcho so I am leaning towards Bellcho if he has a similar game to last week

[Grazz]

Need two of Cripps Vandenberg and CEY, which two do you think ?

Edit- Thinking Van and Cripps

[Mat0369]

Cripps and CEY. Rookies generally struggle to back up huge scores the following week. Plus CEY's floor is higher then Vanders

[Chelskiman]

I would probably go CEY but it is tough to split the first group. Maybe 70 odd for both Taz and Bellcho so I am leaning towards Bellcho if he has a similar game to last week

Yeah, I've been playing Bellchambers as a back up ruckman lately because of poor scores but I can sing him back into the forward line.  He had a good game last week but is usually poor against Richmond.  He did have a 92 on us in 2012 but other than that he's never scoredover 70 for us.

[Grazz]

Cripps and CEY. Rookies generally struggle to back up huge scores the following week. Plus CEY's floor is higher then Vanders

Yeh fair point you make. He has put out an 87 against Freo after a 106 against Rich but that's a one of sample size so not much to go on.

[ADEZ]

Thoughts on McKenzie vs. Kelly?

Worried about Kelly against Freo

[Vindicate]

Thoughts on McKenzie vs. Kelly?

Worried about Kelly against Freo

I am personally choosing to field Kelly over Mckenzie. He is named on the ground and McKenzie has the potential to be the sub. Also, at worst I think Kelly should be safe for around the 50 mark and if he scores well previous games have shown that he can score around the ton. McKenzie has shown that he has ability to pull out a score of 30 whilst only posting one score above 55.