ROUND 8 TRADES

Started by Asparagus, May 17, 2015, 11:02:17 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Big Mac

Looking at Vanders + Lonie to Buddy + Glenn

Have to get rid of those two I think - They would have massive BE's

H1bb3i2d

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on May 17, 2015, 10:55:16 PM
Quote from: H1bb3i2d on May 17, 2015, 10:50:43 PM
Have a good look at Anderson, I'm starting to think I might take him over Lever and just leave McIntosh at D7

He isn't even getting a game now, so why would be a good option?

Right now they're rotating guys like Anderson and Hartung through that 21st/22nd spot to make sure they keep that taste of AFL footy fresh in their mouth in case they're called upon. I'd say as soon as an injury or 2 bob up he's next in line for a decent gig. Realistically all I would want from him is to play rounds 12 and 13, and if I were to choose someone like Lever or Stretch, what are the odds they get dropped between now and then? Probably quite high.

Big Mac

Quote from: H1bb3i2d on May 17, 2015, 11:01:14 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on May 17, 2015, 10:55:16 PM
Quote from: H1bb3i2d on May 17, 2015, 10:50:43 PM
Have a good look at Anderson, I'm starting to think I might take him over Lever and just leave McIntosh at D7

He isn't even getting a game now, so why would be a good option?

Right now they're rotating guys like Anderson and Hartung through that 21st/22nd spot to make sure they keep that taste of AFL footy fresh in their mouth in case they're called upon. I'd say as soon as an injury or 2 bob up he's next in line for a decent gig. Realistically all I would want from him is to play rounds 12 and 13, and if I were to choose someone like Lever or Stretch, what are the odds they get dropped between now and then? Probably quite high.

Stretch will be dropped this week

Gigantor

Quote from: Big  Mac on May 17, 2015, 11:03:28 PM
Stretch will be dropped this week

I hope so, it will make my trading decisions easier :)

Colty

Cripps to Rocky and NIC NAT TO JACOBS! Get out of my side, the new rules have crucified him. I'm confident trading him to Jacobs won't bite me in the bot bot. Thoughts?

LordSneeze

Quote from: Colty on May 17, 2015, 11:10:25 PM
Cripps to Rocky and NIC NAT TO JACOBS! Get out of my side, the new rules have crucified him. I'm confident trading him to Jacobs won't bite me in the bot bot. Thoughts?
I don't think Nic Nat to Jacobs is worth it at the moment. Surely you have other issues and players that need trading before upgrading mid pricers.

Colty

True but I just don't see Jacobs  being at that price again, so cheap. I can change mid price players to fallen players any time.  Nic Nat just turning out 70s each week is a killer.

frenzy

already done em Lol, Lonie and Brayshaw goneski Rocky and Steele for a floating donut in

kilbluff1985

Quote from: frenzy on May 18, 2015, 12:15:28 AM
already done em Lol, Lonie and Brayshaw goneski Rocky and Steele for a floating donut in

Freo and Saints have most Sunday games in 2nd half of the year would choose a player from them as a floating donut

Bully

Quote from: kilbluff1985 on May 18, 2015, 12:25:55 AM
Quote from: frenzy on May 18, 2015, 12:15:28 AM
already done em Lol, Lonie and Brayshaw goneski Rocky and Steele for a floating donut in

Freo and Saints have most Sunday games in 2nd half of the year would choose a player from them as a floating donut

Floating donuts prior to the byes isn't the smartest move.

Sabretooth Tigers

 ::)

Providing one of Griffin or Bennell come up this week, will trade out  R Hendersen and Cripps for T McDonald and Rockliff     :-\

ryanbob0357

Need to bring in a ruckmen, pushing TBC to fwd bench. Looking to bring in one of Jacobs, Mumford, Maric or Blitz. Thinking blitz for a pod, plus leaves me with 90k for mabe Miller to Rocky next week. But will most likely go Mumford since I will have a backup in TBC incase mumford is rested.

Holden the ball

oxley have to go with a BE of 95?

i was thinking vanders to rocky
with a mcintosh downgrade

Asparagus

Quote from: Holden the ball on May 18, 2015, 07:49:12 AM
oxley have to go with a BE of 95?

i was thinking vanders to rocky
with a mcintosh downgrade
And Lumumba BE of 101.

What to do?!?!
Lumumba for mine.

Big Mac

Quote from: Asparagus on May 18, 2015, 07:52:25 AM
Quote from: Holden the ball on May 18, 2015, 07:49:12 AM
oxley have to go with a BE of 95?

i was thinking vanders to rocky
with a mcintosh downgrade
And Lumumba BE of 101.

What to do?!?!
Lumumba for mine.

Hold him against the dogs I reckon