Tom Mitchell

Started by Thewizz71, May 02, 2015, 05:03:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Carn


jeesh

#181
Quote from: Carn on June 27, 2015, 04:38:35 AM
Quote from: vmac66 on June 27, 2015, 04:21:19 AM
Subbed . .

Should we be worried?

Yeah I reckon there could be reason for some slight concern. The fact they lost Longmire might look to make some changes with Heeney and McGlynn waiting in the wings. Although with Buddy and Tippett both likely to get suspended some fill in forwards will be priority one

sammy123

Quote from: Carn on June 27, 2015, 04:38:35 AM
Quote from: vmac66 on June 27, 2015, 04:21:19 AM
Subbed . .

Should we be worried?

Yep seeing As Sydney were in front by 5 goals and then lost. Longmire will have a few names on the chopping block. Heeney,mcglynn,towers,robinson,bird all in line for selection

PICCOLLO

I deliberately held off getting him for this reason.  Longmire doesn't like him so he's basically playing for his life week in, week out.  Having said that, I finally brought him in this week, thinking that BS was finally over.  Lets see if he stays in for next week.  You'd think he gets one more go at it.  Heeney still not back to reserves yet so perhaps he has time.

MontyJnr

Rhyce Shaw should be the first one to be dropped. Playing seriously average.

sammy123

SO many players should be cut.  Mitchell will be up there though.

honza

Quote from: Carn on June 27, 2015, 03:41:28 AM
Did he get dragged today? Or was it an injury?

Dragged.

No worries. Bont is $415k now.

IntegralX

 Longmire gets an F for his coaching performance last night. That loss is on him more than anyone else.

That being said, if I'm Tom Mitchell and I get dropped for the first bad game I play this season, I'm demanding a trade.

Grazz

Mitchell did a great job on Martin last night. Martin had 40 DT points when Titch was subbed and put on almost 30 after the sub was made i the 4th qtr. Horse flowered up it's more on him than the players.

Mat0369

Quote from: Grazz on June 27, 2015, 01:32:42 PM
Mitchell did a great job on Martin last night. Martin had 40 DT points when Titch was subbed and put on almost 30 after the sub was made i the 4th qtr. Horse flowered up it's more on him than the players.

I missed the game but this statement makes me sad since I had both in DT

Grazz

Quote from: Mat0369 on June 27, 2015, 01:59:41 PM
Quote from: Grazz on June 27, 2015, 01:32:42 PM
Mitchell did a great job on Martin last night. Martin had 40 DT points when Titch was subbed and put on almost 30 after the sub was made i the 4th qtr. Horse flowered up it's more on him than the players.

I missed the game but this statement makes me sad since I had both in DT

Same mate, why a coach would use a ball magnet like Titch for a job like that is beyond me to be honest. Poor coaching simple.

GoLions

Quote from: Grazz on June 27, 2015, 02:03:20 PM
Quote from: Mat0369 on June 27, 2015, 01:59:41 PM
Quote from: Grazz on June 27, 2015, 01:32:42 PM
Mitchell did a great job on Martin last night. Martin had 40 DT points when Titch was subbed and put on almost 30 after the sub was made i the 4th qtr. Horse flowered up it's more on him than the players.

I missed the game but this statement makes me sad since I had both in DT

Same mate, why a coach would use a ball magnet like Titch for a job like that is beyond me to be honest. Poor coaching simple.
I agree, but probably for a different reason (in regards to poor coaching). If Mitchell was doing such a good job, then it was stupid to sub him. Dusty got involved a lot more late in the game. IMO it was good coaching by having Titch tag Dusty to begin with, as Dusty is wayyyyyy more damaging than Titch.

Grazz

Quote from: GoLions on June 27, 2015, 02:54:04 PM
Quote from: Grazz on June 27, 2015, 02:03:20 PM
Quote from: Mat0369 on June 27, 2015, 01:59:41 PM
Quote from: Grazz on June 27, 2015, 01:32:42 PM
Mitchell did a great job on Martin last night. Martin had 40 DT points when Titch was subbed and put on almost 30 after the sub was made i the 4th qtr. Horse flowered up it's more on him than the players.

I missed the game but this statement makes me sad since I had both in DT

Same mate, why a coach would use a ball magnet like Titch for a job like that is beyond me to be honest. Poor coaching simple.
I agree, but probably for a different reason (in regards to poor coaching). If Mitchell was doing such a good job, then it was stupid to sub him. Dusty got involved a lot more late in the game. IMO it was good coaching by having Titch tag Dusty to begin with, as Dusty is wayyyyyy more damaging than Titch.

Thats is true mate but surely you have someone else do that job.

Mat0369

Quote from: GoLions on June 27, 2015, 02:54:04 PM
I agree, but probably for a different reason (in regards to poor coaching). If Mitchell was doing such a good job, then it was stupid to sub him. Dusty got involved a lot more late in the game. IMO it was good coaching by having Titch tag Dusty to begin with, as Dusty is wayyyyyy more damaging than Titch.

You would think it's so they could get more run on but considering Mitchell is suited to the wet it makes me question why you would pick him. You probably would have dragged Derickx unless Mitchell was injured.

HotTiges

Yesh that was Mitchells prob before..no good defensively..cunninggam or mcglynn normal taggers . Cunningham shut houli out of course