Nathan Krakour

[Judd Magic]

:o and now welcome to my team Krakouer at the expense of Clarke... Easy in the end Lol 8)

Clarke's only out for a week with a negative breakeven of -14.

Back to the drawing board.....

[Slashers]

:o and now welcome to my team Krakouer at the expense of Clarke... Easy in the end Lol 8)

Clarke's only out for a week with a negative breakeven of -14.

Back to the drawing board.....

Agree.
Heeney OUT - Krak IN a better option.

[Judd Magic]

:o and now welcome to my team Krakouer at the expense of Clarke... Easy in the end Lol 8)

Clarke's only out for a week with a negative breakeven of -14.

Back to the drawing board.....

Agree.
Heeney OUT - Krak IN a better option.

Yeah Heeney or Van Berlo. (I have both)

I had Krakeour from day 1 so I've gone Van Berlo > Tarrant via Bonts dpp.  8)

[frenzy]

:o and now welcome to my team Krakouer at the expense of Clarke... Easy in the end Lol 8)

Clarke's only out for a week with a negative breakeven of -14.

Back to the drawing board.....

Haha, suggestions

I think Krak will make more cash in this first week, than Clark has in two rises and now injured. I understand clark will still make money and his negative BE and all, but krak will make more cash faster.

[GCSkiwi]

:o and now welcome to my team Krakouer at the expense of Clarke... Easy in the end Lol 8)

Clarke's only out for a week with a negative breakeven of -14.

Back to the drawing board.....

Haha, suggestions

I think Krak will make more cash in this first week, than Clark has in two rises and now injured. I understand clark will still make money and his negative BE and all, but krak will make more cash faster.

Looking at your team I would almost be tempted to go with Brayshaw more than Clark... still has a low BE (12) but it's not in the negatives, seems to be vest bait and is averaging the same as Clark anyway. Only thing being I reckon Brayshaw will be more consistent than Clark, Clark will have big games and little games, Brayshaw I think will always be ~60. So if Clark comes out and gets 90 in his next game, it might hurt... But then you don't know how long Clark could be out for, tough call.

How many trades have you made so far? Krak is pretty close to a must-have for me, playing really well and Port will find a way to keep him playing if he keeps it up (remembering he's rookie listed still).

[Keeper27]

are you guys worried that he's been named on the extended bench??

[Ricochet]

are you guys worried that he's been named on the extended bench??

A little, but plan will be to trade VB to him I think so can make that call when final teams are out

[GCSkiwi]

When are final teams usually named by? I was going to go Bartel and Lamb to Krak and Taz, Thinking I start with Bartel to Taz given that Geelong play early saturday, then Weagles play sat night so if Krak doesn't make the cut I can bring in Gray instead...

[Ricochet]

When are final teams usually named by? I was going to go Bartel and Lamb to Krak and Taz, Thinking I start with Bartel to Taz given that Geelong play early saturday, then Weagles play sat night so if Krak doesn't make the cut I can bring in Gray instead...

Extended benches are cut this afternoon, final teams and subs are 1.5hrs before the game starts

[tor01doc]

I do like this site.

Most people are helpful.

[GCSkiwi]

I do like this site.

Most people are helpful.

Hear hear. Cheers Rico. Yeah sub vest will always be a risk but at least I'll know if he's in the 22, given how he's been playing he should surely be safe but you never quite know...

[jeesh]

(remembering he's rookie listed still).

So if the plan was to upgrade Krak why wouldn't it of taken place already?

[frenzy]

:o and now welcome to my team Krakouer at the expense of Clarke... Easy in the end Lol 8)

Clarke's only out for a week with a negative breakeven of -14.

Back to the drawing board.....

Haha, suggestions

I think Krak will make more cash in this first week, than Clark has in two rises and now injured. I understand clark will still make money and his negative BE and all, but krak will make more cash faster.

Looking at your team I would almost be tempted to go with Brayshaw more than Clark... still has a low BE (12) but it's not in the negatives, seems to be vest bait and is averaging the same as Clark anyway. Only thing being I reckon Brayshaw will be more consistent than Clark, Clark will have big games and little games, Brayshaw I think will always be ~60. So if Clark comes out and gets 90 in his next game, it might hurt... But then you don't know how long Clark could be out for, tough call.

How many trades have you made so far? Krak is pretty close to a must-have for me, playing really well and Port will find a way to keep him playing if he keeps it up (remembering he's rookie listed still).

Thanks GCSkiwi, something to consider, hope Brayshaw is over getting the green vest and he can start to get some full games

[GCSkiwi]

(remembering he's rookie listed still).

So if the plan was to upgrade Krak why wouldn't it of taken place already?

What do you mean? He's on the rookie list, he's playing because he's been upgraded to senior due to Frampton's injury, so technically when Frampton is recovered Krak goes back to the rookie pile...

"Under AFL rules, the Power is able to promote a rookie to temporarily replace a player on the long term injury list; in this case, Krakouer replaces 18-year-old ruckman Billy Frampton, who is at least four weeks from returning from his shin rehabilitation."

From http://www.portadelaidefc.com.au/news/2015-04-16/kraks-phoenix-rises

I'm quite certain that if he keeps killing it they'll find someone else to put on the LTI list to keep him in, or maybe Frampton will have a really really long recovery. But it's still a small risk they he could get relegated again.

[honza]

^ It's AFL. No team will go the next 4 months without an LTI each.

Pick him. If they want him they'll find a way. Happens too regularly to notice.