Patty Cripps

[FactHunt]

he will be in there for sure now

just remember judd wont play every week if he pumps out and 80-100 in the next2 weeks he will be 450k with his 3 week average being like 120!!!!!!!!!!!

Will be looking to move him on in 3 weeks when the 170 is still in their

170 + 80 + 80 = 110 average

But what happens when he goes 170 next week ;) :P

[Gigantor]

Wonder what his BE will be next week

-100?

Not quite but I'm guessing -85 ish

Should be -119

Would have been 4 if he scored 49. Scored 123 more than predicted, hence the BE should be 123 less

I don't think its that simple, its based on price and a rolling 3 round average

[js19]

Wonder what his BE will be next week

-100?

Not quite but I'm guessing -85 ish

Should be -119

Would have been 4 if he scored 49. Scored 123 more than predicted, hence the BE should be 123 less

I don't think its that simple, its based on price and a rolling 3 round average

Happy to be proven wrong, but this basic calculation has been very reliable so far. Could be slight deviation due to changes in the magic number, but usually not too far off

[reenergised]

Awesome score - on my bench..... :o

+1
Loopholed Vandenberg, stuck with CEY and NVB on field, it's a lot to leave on the bench :(

Played - NVB CEY Heeney
Benched - Vandenburg Cripps Miller

Tell me I am not the only one.

+1, me too :(

+1  ::)

[johnoP]

Awesome score - on my bench..... :o

+1
Loopholed Vandenberg, stuck with CEY and NVB on field, it's a lot to leave on the bench :(

Played - NVB CEY Heeney
Benched - Vandenburg Cripps Miller

Tell me I am not the only one.

+1, me too :(

+1  ::)

+1 easy way to drop a few hundred points eh?

[H1bb3i2d]

Wonder what his BE will be next week

-100?

Not quite but I'm guessing -85 ish

Should be -119

Would have been 4 if he scored 49. Scored 123 more than predicted, hence the BE should be 123 less

I don't think its that simple, its based on price and a rolling 3 round average

Happy to be proven wrong, but this basic calculation has been very reliable so far. Could be slight deviation due to changes in the magic number, but usually not too far off

However, scoring higher than expected, he'll be more expensive than expected, and therefore would have a higher relative breakeven. But it'll be pretty high nonetheless!

[js19]

Wonder what his BE will be next week

-100?

Not quite but I'm guessing -85 ish

Should be -119

Would have been 4 if he scored 49. Scored 123 more than predicted, hence the BE should be 123 less

I don't think its that simple, its based on price and a rolling 3 round average

Happy to be proven wrong, but this basic calculation has been very reliable so far. Could be slight deviation due to changes in the magic number, but usually not too far off

However, scoring higher than expected, he'll be more expensive than expected, and therefore would have a higher relative breakeven. But it'll be pretty high nonetheless!

Yes I stand corrected. -86 is the number

[ando_10]

still LOLing at people who traded him.

[dmac07]

still LOLing at people who traded him.

to nvb who has averaged 55 since they got him in 2 weeks ago thats a 150 point loss in 2 weeks

[justaverage]

still LOLing at people who traded him.

to nvb who has averaged 55 since they got him in 2 weeks ago thats a 150 point loss in 2 weeks

Yep

[quinny88]

still LOLing at people who traded him.

Me  :-[

[Jroo]

Lol I was gonna trade him to Lambert in Rd 2 because I needed cash. Luckily I kept him haha

[crowls]

Awesome score - on my bench..... :o

+1
Loopholed Vandenberg, stuck with CEY and NVB on field, it's a lot to leave on the bench :(

Played - NVB CEY Heeney
Benched - Vandenburg Cripps Miller

Tell me I am not the only one.

Man that hurt.
CEY Heeney, VDB on field,    Loopholed Gray for Cripps score,   Miller and NVB on bench