Goldstein VS Bont

[DoctorRush]

Hey all,

I know I won't be the only one with the "Bartel to Who" situation who has narrowed down the options to the two boys in the poll.

I thought we could all benefit from this poll, not just me  ;)

Cheers

[tor01doc]

Proven premium in a team bound for finals action (well maybe anyway) vs potential breakout in a crap team?

Look at it this way and it's easy.

[Big Mac]

Por que no los dos?

In the case where por que no los dos is not an option, pick Goldy

[SydneyRox]

Proven premium in a team bound for finals action (well maybe anyway) vs potential breakout in a crap team?

Look at it this way and it's easy.

Doc should charge for this advice! Clear and to the point

[Bully]

Proven premium in a team bound for finals action (well maybe anyway) vs potential breakout in a crap team?

Look at it this way and it's easy.

Doc should charge for this advice! Clear and to the point

But only half the story, Bont plus 160k plus negative BE vs Goldy.

[JBs-Hawks]

But North are a crap team too :P

[meow meow]

Yeah because being in a crap team means poor SC scores doesn't it? We're only a crap team when Bont isn't playing. We would have beaten the Hawks if Bont played.

[Sideboob Bob]

But only half the story, Bont plus 160k plus negative BE vs Goldy.

Doesn't change it for me.

Doc should charge for this advice! Clear and to the point

[Sideboob Bob]

Yeah because being in a crap team means poor SC scores doesn't it? We're only a crap team when Bont isn't playing. We would have beaten the Hawks if Bont played.

Being in a crap team means less SC points for the team. Losses = less points

[meow meow]

Yeah because being in a crap team means poor SC scores doesn't it? We're only a crap team when Bont isn't playing. We would have beaten the Hawks if Bont played.

Being in a crap team means less SC points for the team. Losses = less points

Really? Explain how GWS were in the top 8 for average SC points scored per week last year then.

[DoctorRush]

Good discussion people.
Looks like Goldy is the fave at the moment. My gut is saying the Bont won't maintain and won't be a keeper.
Thanks for the assist everyone!

[batt]

The fact that the Bont has 6 votes is a credit to this hype train he's mustered up.  Kudos.  If only someone had checked the track up ahead.

[Holden the ball]

umm ruckman to unreliable go bont

[Holden the ball]

But North are a crap team too :P

+1

[tor01doc]

Yeah because being in a crap team means poor SC scores doesn't it? We're only a crap team when Bont isn't playing. We would have beaten the Hawks if Bont played.

Being in a crap team means less SC points for the team. Losses = less points

Really? Explain how GWS were in the top 8 for average SC points scored per week last year then.

Now now meow meow,

I have just looked at the last 18 games and noticed that in the majority ( like all 18) the number of players scoring 90 or more was greater in the team that won.

Not sure what it means but I would rather a team of players from a winning team than a team of players from a losing team.