For those who went without Swan...

Started by MC, April 17, 2015, 11:21:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Sabretooth Tigers

 :)

More than prepared to wait 22 weeks to see if I regret not taking him.  But feel good for those that did. Something just set me dead against him, and will follow the hunch.  Cheers to all, even those smiling.      ;)

honza

Hopefully this thread goes the way of the "har-har I have mid priced rucks" thread.

Oh wait I've got Swan.

Play on.

Mark

Im happy picking Bont and the extra $$ got Fyfe over Selwood so I think im winning so far...

But is very early days.

Even if Bont is late out this weekend im still happy  :D

MC

Haha love how this has gone! Such controversy! Swan > Bont so far!

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: MC on April 18, 2015, 10:58:36 AM
Haha love how this has gone! Such controversy! Swan > Bont so far!

Having both is the real win. Comparing the two has no substance. You're comparing a 2nd year player to one of the biggest elite scoring players ever

Grufflez

I talked down Swan but ended up going with him based on his price which fitted my structure, so i am a hypocrite but a happy hypocrite  ;D

Keeper27

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 18, 2015, 12:01:51 PM
Quote from: MC on April 18, 2015, 10:58:36 AM
Haha love how this has gone! Such controversy! Swan > Bont so far!

Having both is the real win. Comparing the two has no substance. You're comparing a 2nd year player to one of the biggest elite scoring players ever

H1bb3i2d

Not happy he scored so well...

Now his typical monster anzac day score wont be a unique VC option  :'(

crowls

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 18, 2015, 12:01:51 PM
Quote from: MC on April 18, 2015, 10:58:36 AM
Haha love how this has gone! Such controversy! Swan > Bont so far!

Having both is the real win. Comparing the two has no substance. You're comparing a 2nd year player to one of the biggest elite scoring players ever
Got both.   :D  dropped martin.   maybe get him during byes,

SydneyRox