ROUND 2 TEAM ANNOUNCEMENTS: Bartel Out,Cripps Out

[_wato]

Uhhhhhhh well, I hope everyone burns these so called 'corrective' trades

I can see loads of people down to 26 trades by the end of next week hahaha

[Bully]

Deep breathes Bully

Deep breathes ;)

With Bartel out I just don't feel confident in relying on Cocky, Miller & Heeney.

Mummy to Blicavs
Cripps to judd/Steven ... Thoughts ?

I don't mind it, I personally don't see the point in holding onto 600k ruckman, I would pick Steven over Judd.

Uhhhhhhh well, I hope everyone burns these so called 'corrective' trades

I can see loads of people down to 26 trades by the end of next week hahaha

And I can see many losing value by hanging onto Cripps, most will trade him anyway. The theory that you'll be a trade up is flawed.

[Jimmykidd]

ill trade him next week if hes not named. heeney on the ground for now

[_wato]

Heeney on field, no problem Bully?

Cripps to Anderson next week if he plays well, pocket $70k in the process

[Mat0369]

ill trade him next week if hes not named. heeney and Vanders on the ground for now

[Gigantor]

This just in

Round 3 teams:
In - Cripps
Out - whoever you traded Cripps out for.

I love seeing these fantasy gimps wreck their teams.

Don't forget
In - Lids and Bartel
Out - Whoever you traded them for

[eaglesman]

Deep breathes Bully

Deep breathes ;)

With Bartel out I just don't feel confident in relying on Cocky, Miller & Heeney.

Mummy to Blicavs
Cripps to judd/Steven ... Thoughts ?

I don't mind it, I personally don't see the point in holding onto 600k ruckman, I would pick Steven over Judd.

Uhhhhhhh well, I hope everyone burns these so called 'corrective' trades

I can see loads of people down to 26 trades by the end of next week hahaha

And I can see many losing value by hanging onto Cripps, most will trade him anyway. The theory that you'll be a trade up is flawed.

Swan?

[Bully]

Deep breathes Bully

Deep breathes ;)

With Bartel out I just don't feel confident in relying on Cocky, Miller & Heeney.

Mummy to Blicavs
Cripps to judd/Steven ... Thoughts ?

I don't mind it, I personally don't see the point in holding onto 600k ruckman, I would pick Steven over Judd.

Uhhhhhhh well, I hope everyone burns these so called 'corrective' trades

I can see loads of people down to 26 trades by the end of next week hahaha

And I can see many losing value by hanging onto Cripps, most will trade him anyway. The theory that you'll be a trade up is flawed.

Swan?

Absoluetly 100% get Swan.

[eaglesman]

Deep breathes Bully

Deep breathes ;)

With Bartel out I just don't feel confident in relying on Cocky, Miller & Heeney.

Mummy to Blicavs
Cripps to judd/Steven ... Thoughts ?

I don't mind it, I personally don't see the point in holding onto 600k ruckman, I would pick Steven over Judd.

Uhhhhhhh well, I hope everyone burns these so called 'corrective' trades

I can see loads of people down to 26 trades by the end of next week hahaha

And I can see many losing value by hanging onto Cripps, most will trade him anyway. The theory that you'll be a trade up is flawed.

Swan?

Absoluetly 100% get Swan.

Done it

[RaisyDaisy]

Uhhhhhhh well, I hope everyone burns these so called 'corrective' trades

I can see loads of people down to 26 trades by the end of next week hahaha

And I can see many losing value by hanging onto Cripps, most will trade him anyway. The theory that you'll be a trade up is flawed.

So an hour ago you were fielding Cripps, but now Heeney's score isn't good enough and it's worth burning a trade?

[Goosey]

I still haven't decided on what to do with Rocky, if I flick Cripps tonight I could grab Rich and Dangerfield.

[Trindacut]

And I can see many losing value by hanging onto Cripps, most will trade him anyway. The theory that you'll be a trade up is flawed.

Are you a full blown tard?

If he isn't playing he isn't losing value. If you don't trade you will be a trade up.

Opportunity cost mate, the others are gaining value. It's pretty simple maths.

-No one- is gaining value this week.

It's a pretty simple rule.

Been around for years.

[Bully]

Uhhhhhhh well, I hope everyone burns these so called 'corrective' trades

I can see loads of people down to 26 trades by the end of next week hahaha

And I can see many losing value by hanging onto Cripps, most will trade him anyway. The theory that you'll be a trade up is flawed.

So an hour ago you were fielding Cripps, but now Heeney's score isn't good enough and it's worth burning a trade?

It's not blowing a trade, you will also be trading Cripps next week, unless of course you want see if he can better his 50 in round 4.

And I can see many losing value by hanging onto Cripps, most will trade him anyway. The theory that you'll be a trade up is flawed.

Are you a full blown tard?

If he isn't playing he isn't losing value. If you don't trade you will be a trade up.

Opportunity cost mate, the others are gaining value. It's pretty simple maths.

-No one- is gaining value this week.

It's a pretty simple rule.

Been around for years.

He has a 50 in his rolling average and he's now a week behind the others, not to mention we don't know when he'll be back. Horses for courses, I'm moving a week earlier than most, you can hang onto Cripps if you like, not my concern.

[eaglesman]

Uhhhhhhh well, I hope everyone burns these so called 'corrective' trades

I can see loads of people down to 26 trades by the end of next week hahaha

And I can see many losing value by hanging onto Cripps, most will trade him anyway. The theory that you'll be a trade up is flawed.

So an hour ago you were fielding Cripps, but now Heeney's score isn't good enough and it's worth burning a trade?

It's not blowing a trade, you will also be trading Cripps next week, unless of course you want see if he can better his 50 in round 4.

And I can see many losing value by hanging onto Cripps, most will trade him anyway. The theory that you'll be a trade up is flawed.

Are you a full blown tard?

If he isn't playing he isn't losing value. If you don't trade you will be a trade up.

Opportunity cost mate, the others are gaining value. It's pretty simple maths.

-No one- is gaining value this week.

It's a pretty simple rule.

Been around for years.

He has a 50 in his rolling average and he's now a week behind the others, not to mention we don't know when he'll be back. Horses for courses, I'm moving a week earlier than most, you can hang onto Cripps if you like, not my concern.

I agree entirely with your opinion on this ... People will be crying if he pumps out a 50 next week or doesn't get named ... He looked average in the match with a full blues midfield

[YoungGun]

Strongly agree with Bully, you are going to do it next week anyway and this way you still allow 2 trades for next week to make sure you are 100% happy with how your team sits before everything really kicks off. Added bonus for me is trading allows me to use a loophole through the midfield rookies.

Just because someone makes a trade round 1 doesn't mean their a ''gimp who is ruining their team''