Ruckmen scoring low! Perhaps it's not a good idea to outlay 600k+ for Jacobs etc

Started by ScottieD, April 04, 2015, 10:55:58 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Doggoneit

So week 1 the top Ruck score was 100. A total of 8 rucks scored between 90 and 100

so far in week 2 we have 5 rucks who have hit the ton and another 2 in the 90's, while Sauce busts out a big 140 (if Maric didn't spend most of the 2nd qtr off the field he would hit the ton as well)

we have another 4 rucks who scored 90+ last week still to play

I am thinking, the adjustments to the scoring coupled with the fact no ruck had a blinder last week made the ruck scores look worse that what we would have expected.

I was certainly considering ruck changes from last weeks exposed data, but I am now much more comfortable with what we can expect and see no reason to be making changes.

thoughts?

mark44

yeah I ended up not trading as belly was my choice and just couldn't trust him, I still think a great score for a ruckman now is going to be 100ish max

a game like jacobs had will only happen if ruckman get heaps of the pill like jacobs did, 24 possessions, or kick goals , or plenty of tackles to go along with there tap outs

They can no longer rely on just tap outs, see how goldstein goes, got him and need a great score

PICCOLLO

Backed my judgement on rucks underperforming.
Maric out, Jpk in.

Maric score this week was matched by salem. No net loss removing him.
Started JPK instead of Heeney. Gained 60 odd points.

So far, so good.

YoungGun

does anyone know where you can find HTA stats? Goldys DT to SC ratio is terrible

HotTiges


YoungGun


MC

Goldy and jacobs each go 150-odd, compared to berger 26... know who i'd rather!

Ricochet

Lol this thread will go around and around all year

"Midpricers are better"
"No, set and forget are better'
etc
etc

MC


crowls


Torpedo10


HotTiges


hawkers65


Trindacut

Jacobs will come through with the goods for me. Had the lowest score loss average from 2014, and was still the top performer. Should dominate this year.

140 says I'm right.

Jay

Nic Nat and Zac Smith.. Both averaging over 90. For their price, I won't be complaining :)